-
Binder, W.: Quo vadis Online-Katalog? : Resümees und Zukunftsperspektiven (1989)
0.08
0.08429195 = product of:
0.12643792 = sum of:
0.050963532 = weight(_text_:im in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050963532 = score(doc=366,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.35334828 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.07547439 = product of:
0.11321158 = sum of:
0.071946286 = weight(_text_:online in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071946286 = score(doc=366,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.4646225 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041265294 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Auf dem Hintergrund der aktuellen OPAC-Entwicklung in Deutschland werden im ersten Teil einzelne Aspekte des OPAC-Designs kommentiert. Es wird u.a. auch auf Möglichkeiten einer Standardisierung der Schnittstelle Retrieval-Software / Benutzeroberfläche eingegangen. Die derzeit dominierenden Online-Kataloge sind für eine Massenbenutzung nur bedingt geeignet, da sie in hohem Maße fehlerintolerant sind, eine Analyse nach Suchfeldern verlangen und mit grundsätzlichen Mängeln der Boole'schen Suchlogik behaftet sind. Im zweiten Teil werden werden Alternativen diskutiert, zum einen in Form eines alphabetisch sortierten Online-Katalogs, zum anderen in Form intelligenter bibliographischer Auskunftssysteme, die Ähnlichkeitssuchen bzw. sog. 'Closest-Match-Suchen' gestatten. Hierzu werden verschiedene Konzepte und Vorschläge vorgestellt
-
Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986)
0.01
0.009217165 = product of:
0.027651494 = sum of:
0.027651494 = product of:
0.08295448 = sum of:
0.08295448 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08295448 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:22:27
-
Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982)
0.01
0.009217165 = product of:
0.027651494 = sum of:
0.027651494 = product of:
0.08295448 = sum of:
0.08295448 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08295448 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 14:49:22
-
Hoffman, H.H.; Magner, J.L.: Future outlook : better retrieval through analytic catalogs (1985)
0.01
0.009170066 = product of:
0.027510196 = sum of:
0.027510196 = product of:
0.08253059 = sum of:
0.08253059 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08253059 = score(doc=6365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 6365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6365)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Broadbent, E.: ¬The online catalog : dictionary, classified, or both? (1989)
0.01
0.0069230343 = product of:
0.020769102 = sum of:
0.020769102 = product of:
0.062307306 = sum of:
0.062307306 = weight(_text_:online in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062307306 = score(doc=457,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The main purpose of the study was to determine if the online catalog can function both as a dictionary and classified catalog without requiring additional time or intellectual effort on the part of the cataloger. A total of 1842 MARC bibliographic records listed in the 370-379 classified section of American Book Publishing Record were studied. These records displayed 2735 subject headings. Of these, 1491 (55%) had a Library of Congress classification number linked to them. An alphabetical and classified index was created using primary subjects and their related classification numbers. While such an index could be a useful browsing device if integrated into an online catalog, creating a bona fide classified catalog would require assigning classification numbers to the secondary subject headings.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
-
Fuller, E.E.: Variation in personal names in works represented in the catalog (1989)
0.01
0.0057112123 = product of:
0.017133636 = sum of:
0.017133636 = product of:
0.051400907 = sum of:
0.051400907 = weight(_text_:online in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051400907 = score(doc=439,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Recent research suggests that many authority records might be unnecessary in online systems with sophisticated programming. One problem in determining which names can be used without full authority records and the references they provide is that there has been little study of the names themselves, and patterns of variation are unknown. In a random sample of persons with entries in the University of Chicago library general catalog, more than 80% had names appearing in only one form in all works. The study also catagorizes the differences among the forms of those names that do appear in more than one way.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
