-
Takeda, N.: Problems in hierarchical structures in thesauri : their influences on the results of information retrieval (1994)
0.09
0.0877666 = product of:
0.1316499 = sum of:
0.03603666 = weight(_text_:im in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03603666 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
0.09561324 = product of:
0.14341986 = sum of:
0.071946286 = weight(_text_:online in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071946286 = score(doc=2642,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.4646225 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
0.07147358 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07147358 = score(doc=2642,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In online retrieval search results do not always match the intent in spite of using correct keywords (descriptors). One of the causes of this problem is found in the hierarchical structures of the thesaurus, which often contains relations between broader and narrower concepts, the opposite of which is not necessarily true. Some examples are described from 2 thesauri, MeSH and JICST. In these cases searchers need to make an effort to increase precision
- Source
- Online Kensaku. 15(1994) no.4, S.183-186
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Zoeken met woorden : hergebruik van onderwerpsontsluiting (1998)
0.08
0.0760325 = product of:
0.11404874 = sum of:
0.045045823 = weight(_text_:im in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045045823 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.06900292 = product of:
0.103504375 = sum of:
0.051922753 = weight(_text_:online in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051922753 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.051581617 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051581617 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Lopes, M.I.: Principles underlying subject heading languages : an international approach (1996)
0.06
0.06497042 = product of:
0.09745562 = sum of:
0.031532075 = weight(_text_:im in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031532075 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
0.06592354 = product of:
0.09888531 = sum of:
0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03634593 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
0.062539384 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062539384 = score(doc=5608,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the problems in establishing commonly accepted principles for subject retrieval between different bibliographic systems. The Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages was established to devise general principles for any subject retrieval system and to review existing real systems in the light of such principles and compare them in order to evaluate the extent of their coverage and their application in current practices. Provides a background and history of the Working Group. Discusses the principles underlying subject headings and their purposes and the state of the work and major findings
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999)
0.05
0.0456195 = product of:
0.06842925 = sum of:
0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027027493 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.04140175 = product of:
0.062102623 = sum of:
0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031153653 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03094897 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Sechser, O.: Beziehungen im Sprachsystem und in Texten (1992)
0.02
0.01801833 = product of:
0.054054987 = sum of:
0.054054987 = weight(_text_:im in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054054987 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.37478244 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997)
0.02
0.016094714 = product of:
0.048284143 = sum of:
0.048284143 = product of:
0.072426215 = sum of:
0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03094897 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04147724 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.01
0.01075336 = product of:
0.03226008 = sum of:
0.03226008 = product of:
0.09678023 = sum of:
0.09678023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09678023 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
-
ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997)
0.01
0.009712125 = product of:
0.029136375 = sum of:
0.029136375 = product of:
0.043704562 = sum of:
0.018172964 = weight(_text_:online in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018172964 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.11735933 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.025531596 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025531596 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
- Content
- Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996)
0.01
0.0086900275 = product of:
0.02607008 = sum of:
0.02607008 = product of:
0.07821024 = sum of:
0.07821024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07821024 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.2006 14:22:21
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.01
0.007680971 = product of:
0.023042914 = sum of:
0.023042914 = product of:
0.06912874 = sum of:
0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06912874 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.11-22
-
Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997)
0.01
0.005731291 = product of:
0.017193872 = sum of:
0.017193872 = product of:
0.051581617 = sum of:
0.051581617 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051581617 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Green, R.: Syntagmatic relationships in index languages : a reassessment (1995)
0.01
0.005673688 = product of:
0.017021064 = sum of:
0.017021064 = product of:
0.05106319 = sum of:
0.05106319 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05106319 = score(doc=3144,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Effective use of syntagmatic relationships in index languages has suffered from inaccurate or incomplete characterization in both linguistics and information science. A number of 'myths' about syntagmatic relationships are debunked: the exclusivity of paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships, linearity as a defining characteristic of syntagmatic relationships, the restriction of syntagmatic relationships to surface linguistic units, the limitation of syntagmatic relationship benefits in document retrieval to precision, and the general irrelevance of syntagmatic relationships for document retrieval. None of the mechanisms currently used with index languages is powerful enough to achieve the levels of precision and recall that the expression of conceptual syntagmatic relationships is in theory capable of. New designs for expressing these relationships in index languages will need to take into account such characteristics as their semantic nature, systematicity, generalizability and constituent nature
-
Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998)
0.01
0.00537668 = product of:
0.01613004 = sum of:
0.01613004 = product of:
0.048390117 = sum of:
0.048390117 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048390117 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Fugmann, R.: Unusual possibilities in indexing and classification (1990)
0.00
0.004585033 = product of:
0.013755098 = sum of:
0.013755098 = product of:
0.041265294 = sum of:
0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041265294 = score(doc=4781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Contemporary research in information science has concentrated on the development of methods for the algorithmic processing of natural language texts. Often, the equivalence of this approach to the intellectual technique of content analysis and indexing is claimed. It is, however, disregarded that contemporary intellectual techniques are far from exploiting their full capabilities. This is largely due to the omission of vocabulary categorisation. It is demonstrated how categorisation can drastically improve the quality of indexing and classification, and, hence, of retrieval
-
Vickery, B.C.: Structure and function in retrieval languages (1997)
0.00
0.004585033 = product of:
0.013755098 = sum of:
0.013755098 = product of:
0.041265294 = sum of:
0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041265294 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Green, R.: ¬The expression of conceptual syntagmatic relationships : a comparative survey (1995)
0.00
0.004011904 = product of:
0.012035711 = sum of:
0.012035711 = product of:
0.03610713 = sum of:
0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03610713 = score(doc=4475,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4475, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4475)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The expression of conceptual syntagmatic relationships in document retrieval systems holds out hope for both increased discrimination generally and increased recall in certain contexts. Such relationships require both a structured inventory of relationships. Examines the means of expressing these. The expression of conceptual syntagmatic relationships must comply with criteria of systematicity, complexity, efficiency and naturalness. Unfortunately, the complex interaction of natural language expression based on lexicalization, word order, function words, and morphosyntactic cases causes failure regarding systematicity. Most methods of expressing conceptual syntagmatic relationships, e.g. term co occurrence techniques, links and role indicators, fail to comply with this and other of the criteria. Only gestalt structures simultaneously representing relationships, participants and roles conform fully to the critical checklist
-
Bean, C.: ¬The semantics of hierarchy : explicit parent-child relationships in MeSH tree structures (1998)
0.00
0.004011904 = product of:
0.012035711 = sum of:
0.012035711 = product of:
0.03610713 = sum of:
0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03610713 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1997)
0.00
0.0034387745 = product of:
0.0103163235 = sum of:
0.0103163235 = product of:
0.03094897 = sum of:
0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03094897 = score(doc=583,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The issue of free-text versus controlled vocabulary is examined in this article. The history of the issue, which is seen as beginning with the debate over title term indexing in the last century, is reviewed and the attention is turned to questions which have not been satisfactorily addressed by previous research. The point is made that these questions need to be answered if we are to design retrieval tools, such as thesauri, upon a national basis
