Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Auszeichnungssprachen"
  1. Patrick, D.A.: XML in der Praxis : Unternehmensübergreifende Vorteile durch Enterprise Content Management (1999) 0.04
    0.04048209 = product of:
      0.060723133 = sum of:
        0.044593092 = weight(_text_:im in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044593092 = score(doc=1461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.30917975 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
        0.01613004 = product of:
          0.048390117 = sum of:
            0.048390117 = weight(_text_:22 in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048390117 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In dem Maße, in dem Unternehmen ihren Erfolg in einem zunehmend von Konkurrenz geprägten Weltmarkt suchen, ist ds Content Management als Informationslösung interessant geworden. Content Management-Systeme können dabei helfen, die enormen betrieblichen Investitionen in die Information zu verringern. Wie bei jeder neuartigen Technologie bestehen auch hier noch keine klaren Vorstellungen darüber, was ContentnManagement eigentlich ausmacht. In diesem Beitrag werden die Probleme und Technologien im Zusammenhang mit dem Content Management untersucht und der aktuelle Stand in Sachen Content Management beschrieben. Content Management ist mehr als nur eine neue Technologie. Im Kern erlaubt Content Management Unternehmen, Informationen zum aufbau intensiverer Beziehungen entlang der Wertschöpfungskette aufzubauen, wobei Kunden, Vertriebspartner, Zulieferer und Hersteller verbunden werden
    Date
    30. 3.2003 10:50:22
  2. Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004) 0.02
    0.024651002 = product of:
      0.073953 = sum of:
        0.073953 = product of:
          0.110929504 = sum of:
            0.062539384 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062539384 = score(doc=2538,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
            0.048390117 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048390117 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Structured document interchange formats such as XML and SGML are ubiquitous, however, information retrieval systems supporting structured searching are not. Structured searching can result in increased precision. A search for the author "Smith" in an unstructured corpus of documents specializing in iron-working could have a lower precision than a structured search for "Smith as author" in the same corpus. Analysis of XML retrieval languages identifies additional functionality that must be supported including searching at, and broken across multiple nodes in the document tree. A data structure is developed to support structured document searching. Application of this structure to information retrieval is then demonstrated. Document ranking is examined and adapted specifically for structured searching.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 10:39:22
  3. as: XML: Extensible Markup Language : I: Was ist XML? (2001) 0.01
    0.007680971 = product of:
      0.023042914 = sum of:
        0.023042914 = product of:
          0.06912874 = sum of:
            0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912874 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2003 11:06:22
  4. Schröder, A.: Web der Zukunft : RDF - Der erste Schritt zum semantischen Web 0.01
    0.006144777 = product of:
      0.01843433 = sum of:
        0.01843433 = product of:
          0.055302992 = sum of:
            0.055302992 = weight(_text_:22 in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055302992 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Seit dem 22. Februar 1999 ist das Resource Description Framework (RDF) als W3C-Empfehlung verfügbar. Doch was steckt hinter diesem Standard, der das Zeitalter des Semantischen Webs einläuten soll? Was RDF bedeutet, wozu man es einsetzt, welche Vorteile es gegenüber XML hat und wie man RDF anwendet, soll in diesem Artikel erläutert werden.
  5. Geeb, F.: Lexikographische Informationsstrukturierung mit XML (2003) 0.00
    0.004615356 = product of:
      0.013846068 = sum of:
        0.013846068 = product of:
          0.0415382 = sum of:
            0.0415382 = weight(_text_:online in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0415382 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Metalexikographie erarbeitet Theorien und Modelle für die Strukturierung lexikographischer Informationen in der Form von Nachschlagewerken (gedruckt oder online). Mit dem Aufkommen von XML steht ein weiteres, besonders wirkungsvolles Werkzeug für die Darstellung dieser Strukturen zur Verfügung. Die lexikographische Auszeichnungssprache leXeML ist ein Versuch, die lexikographische Theoriebildung in ein konkretes und anwendbares Werkzeug zur Informationsstrukturierung umzusetzen.
  6. Ioannides, D.: XML schema languages : beyond DTD (2000) 0.00
    0.0046085827 = product of:
      0.013825747 = sum of:
        0.013825747 = product of:
          0.04147724 = sum of:
            0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04147724 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:01:22
  7. Pharo, N.: ¬The effect of granularity and order in XML element retrieval (2008) 0.00
    0.004585033 = product of:
      0.013755098 = sum of:
        0.013755098 = product of:
          0.041265294 = sum of:
            0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041265294 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Chang, M.: ¬An electronic finding aid using extensible markup language (XML) and encoded archival description (EAD) (2000) 0.00
    0.004011904 = product of:
      0.012035711 = sum of:
        0.012035711 = product of:
          0.03610713 = sum of:
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=4886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4886)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Increasingly, XML applications are appearing on the World Wide Web, from e-commerce to information management. In the case of libraries and archives, XML enables more flexible information management and retrieval than using MARC or a relational database management system. Describes a project to explore the use of XML and the EAD, and the development of a prototype electronic finding aid. It focuses on the technical aspects, and reviews the options available and the choices made. This is done within the setting of a small- to medium-sized archive with minimal tools and resources.

Languages