Search (150 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Hypertext"
  1. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A concept-map thesaurus as a knowledge-based hypertext interface to a bibliographic database (1990) 0.05
    0.047543567 = product of:
      0.07131535 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 2481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=2481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 2481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2481)
        0.048792433 = product of:
          0.07318865 = sum of:
            0.036714934 = weight(_text_:online in 2481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036714934 = score(doc=2481,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 2481, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2481)
            0.03647371 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03647371 = score(doc=2481,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 2481, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2481)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
    Source
    Informatics 10: Prospects for intelligent retrieval. Ed.: Kevin P. Jones
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Tergan, S.-O.: Zum Aufbau von Wissensstrukturen mit Texten und Hypertexten (1993) 0.05
    0.045392495 = product of:
      0.06808874 = sum of:
        0.045045823 = weight(_text_:im in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045045823 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
        0.023042914 = product of:
          0.06912874 = sum of:
            0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912874 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag geht zunächst auf traditionelle lineare texte und deren Funktion im Lehr-Lern-Kontext ein. Anschließend werden Befunde der Textforschung dargestellt. Implikationen der Befunde für das Lernen mit Hypertexten werden erörtert sowie Perspektiven einer kreativen Nutzung von Hypertext zur Förderung kognitiver Lernprozesse aufgezeigt
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 44(1993) H.1, S.15-22
  3. Duncan, E.B.: Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials (1989) 0.04
    0.04279561 = product of:
      0.06419341 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
        0.041670498 = product of:
          0.062505744 = sum of:
            0.036714934 = weight(_text_:online in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036714934 = score(doc=2478,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
            0.025790809 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025790809 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A faceted approach to hypertext (1989) 0.04
    0.04279561 = product of:
      0.06419341 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
        0.041670498 = product of:
          0.062505744 = sum of:
            0.036714934 = weight(_text_:online in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036714934 = score(doc=2480,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
            0.025790809 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025790809 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Hammwöhner, R.: Komplexe Hypertextmodelle im World Wide Web durch dynamische Dokumente (1997) 0.03
    0.033194505 = product of:
      0.049791757 = sum of:
        0.03603666 = weight(_text_:im in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03603666 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
        0.013755098 = product of:
          0.041265294 = sum of:
            0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041265294 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Hypertext - Information Retrieval - Multimedia '97: Theorien, Modelle und Implementierungen integrierter elektronischer Informationssysteme. Proceedings HIM '97. Hrsg.: N. Fuhr u.a
  6. Rittberger, M.: Online-Retrieval und Hypertext : auf dem Weg zu verknüpften Datenbanken und offenen Hypertextsystemen (1994) 0.03
    0.03220136 = product of:
      0.09660408 = sum of:
        0.09660408 = product of:
          0.14490612 = sum of:
            0.07269186 = weight(_text_:online in 7604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07269186 = score(doc=7604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 7604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7604)
            0.07221426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07221426 = score(doc=7604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7604)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Dimitroff, A.; Wolfram, D.: Searcher response in a hypertext-based bibliographic information retrieval system (1995) 0.03
    0.028172573 = product of:
      0.08451772 = sum of:
        0.08451772 = product of:
          0.12677658 = sum of:
            0.07147358 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07147358 = score(doc=187,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
            0.055302992 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055302992 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines searcher behavior and affective response to a hypertext-based bibliographic information retrieval system called HyperLynx for searchers with different search skills and backgrounds. Search times and number of nodes visited were recorded for five specified search queries, and views of the system were recorded for each searcher. No significant differences were found in search times or user satisfaction with the system, indicating that a hypertext-based approach to bibliographic retrieval could be appropriate for a variety of searcher experience levels
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S.22-29
  8. Just, M.: Hypertext und Hypermedia (1993) 0.02
    0.02402444 = product of:
      0.07207332 = sum of:
        0.07207332 = weight(_text_:im in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07207332 = score(doc=5018,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.49970993 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag versucht, die denkbaren Anwendungen des Hypertext- und Hypermedia-Konzepts im Bibliotheksbereich aufzuzeigen und zu bewerten. Im ersten Teil wird nach einem kurzen historischen Abriß der beiden Begriffe Hypertext und Hypermedia, ihrer Definition und Beschreibung, auf die sich hinter ihnen verbergende neue Art der Datenorganisation und die sich daraus ergebenden Möglichkeiten und Probleme eingegangen. Im zweiten Teil werden dann die bibliotheksspezifischen Einsatzmöglichkeiten des Hypertext- und Hypermedia-Konzepts erörtert und einige bereits realisierte Anwendungen im Bibliotheksbereich vorgestellt
  9. Sarre, F.; Güntzer, U.; Myka, A.; Jüttner, G.: Maschinelles Lernen von Relationen für Thesauri und Hypertext (1992) 0.02
    0.020746566 = product of:
      0.031119848 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 1368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=1368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 1368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1368)
        0.008596936 = product of:
          0.025790809 = sum of:
            0.025790809 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025790809 = score(doc=1368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1368)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Fortschrittliche Informationssysteme stellen ihren Benutzern 2 wichtige Suchmethoden zur Verfügung: die gezielte (Volltext-) Suche und das Navigieren im Objektbestand mit Hilfe von Hypertext-Links. Der Grund, warum diese beiden Konzepte aber auf breiter Basis noch nicht in jedem Informationssystem Anwendung gefunden haben, ist darin zu sehen, daß der manuelle Aufbau von umfassenden Hypertext-Strukturen auf der einen Seite und von großen Thesauri, die den Erfolg von Volltextsuchen wesentlich steigern, auf der anderen Seite bislang enormen Aufwand und damit hohe Kosten verursachte. Langfristig werden Informationssysteme aber nur dann große Akzeptanz bei der Benutzerschaft erzielen, wenn sie ihre Benutzer mit diesen beiden Techniken unterstützen und wenn sie dynamisch neuen Informationsbedürfnissen anpassen können, also lernfähig sind. Für den einzelnen Benutzer ergibt sich daraus der wesentliche Vorteil, daß er von den Recherche-Erfahrungen anderer Benutzer profitieren kann. In diesem Papier stellen wir eine Lernkomponente vor, die für das Hypertextsystem 'HyperMan' an der TU München entwickelt und implementiert wurde. Wir zeigen beispielhaft, wie Volltext-Suchanfragen der HyperMan-Benutzer von der Lernkomponente untersucht werden, um Thesauruseinträge zu gewinnen. Bei der Entwicklung dieser Lerntechniken zum (automatischen) Thesaurusaufbau konnte auf Erfahrungen mit dem lernfähigen Information Retrieval System 'Tegen' zurückgegriffen werden. In dem HyperMan System werden aber nicht nur Beziehungen (Relationen) zwischen Begriffen erlernt, sondern auch zwischen Textstücken. Wir gehen daher auch darauf ein, wie aufgrund einer Analyse des Benutzerverhaltens sowohl neue Hypertext-Links erlernt als auch vorhandene Links, die zuvor von HyperMans Generierungskomponente automatisch erzeugt wurden, modifiziert werden
  10. Kim, S.H.; Eastman, C.M.: ¬An experiment on node size in a hypermedia system (1999) 0.02
    0.018777166 = product of:
      0.056331497 = sum of:
        0.056331497 = product of:
          0.08449724 = sum of:
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=3673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
            0.048390117 = weight(_text_:22 in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048390117 = score(doc=3673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The node size that should be used in a hypermedia system is an important design issue. 3 interpretations of node size are identified: storage (physical size), window size (presentation size), and length (logical size). an experiment in which presentation size and text length are varied in a HyperCard application is described. The experiment involves student subjects performing a fact retrieval task from a reference handbook. No interaction is found between these 2 independent variables. Performance is significantly better for the longer texts, but no significant difference is found for the 2 different window sizes
    Date
    22. 5.1999 9:35:20
  11. Pollard, R.: Hypertext presentation of thesauri used in on-line searching (1990) 0.02
    0.018400777 = product of:
      0.05520233 = sum of:
        0.05520233 = product of:
          0.082803495 = sum of:
            0.0415382 = weight(_text_:online in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0415382 = score(doc=4892,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
            0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041265294 = score(doc=4892,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the strengths and limitations of hypertext for the online presentation of thesauri used in information retrieval. Examines the ability of hypertext to support each of 3 common types of thesaurus display: graphic, alphabetical, and hierarchical. Presents a design for a hypertext-based hierarchical display that addresses many inadequacies of printed hierarchical displays. Ullustrates how the design might be implemented using a commercially available hypertext system. Considers issues related to the implementation and evaluation of hypertext-based thesauri
  12. Carlson, P.A.: ¬The rhetoric of hypertext (1990) 0.02
    0.018400777 = product of:
      0.05520233 = sum of:
        0.05520233 = product of:
          0.082803495 = sum of:
            0.0415382 = weight(_text_:online in 4914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0415382 = score(doc=4914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 4914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4914)
            0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041265294 = score(doc=4914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4914)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project which modelled the human reading of a printed maintenance manual and designed and implemented a hypertext version of the document using Apple Computer's HyperCard. Since few fully specified hypertext systems have been deployed, the research was undertaken to build a platform on which notions about the efficacy of nonlinear text processing for a specific application could be tried out. Describes a stackware version of a portion of an aircraft maintenance manual and considers issues of data storage models, user interface, and information retrieval methods for online text. These elements - among others - are the essence of the new rhetoric for non-sequential text
  13. Milne, R.J.: Hypertext and its implications for library services. (1994) 0.02
    0.018400777 = product of:
      0.05520233 = sum of:
        0.05520233 = product of:
          0.082803495 = sum of:
            0.0415382 = weight(_text_:online in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0415382 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
            0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041265294 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Offers an introduction to hypertext for librarians. Defines hypertext. Discusses the advantages of hypertext according to the creation and tracing of references; flexibility of nodes and links; cognition augmentation and collaborative work. Examines hypertext disadvantages and problems by considering its static nature; conceptual fragmentation; disorientation; cognitive overhead; presentation rhetoric; cost and intellectual security. Discusses library applications of hypertext covering information retrieval; online databases; citation indexing; OPACs and electronic books. Considers expert systems with hypertext features and hypertext with artificial intelligence
  14. Addison, E.R.; Nelson, P.E.: Intelligent hypertext (1992) 0.02
    0.018400777 = product of:
      0.05520233 = sum of:
        0.05520233 = product of:
          0.082803495 = sum of:
            0.0415382 = weight(_text_:online in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0415382 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
            0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041265294 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional hypertext adds structure to electronic documents by linking related concepts. This hypertext is normally produced by the author that specialises in the production of electronic documents. Describes a system, ConQuest, that eliminates the need for hypertext produced by authors. ConQuest is a natural language, concept based text search, retrieval and browsing engine that automatically finds related concepts in a document using linguistic processing and a built in lexical knowledge base. Because of its high accuracy, ConQuest can link document concepts dynamically, acting as a form of intelligent hypertext
    Source
    13th National Online Meeting. Ed.: M.E. Williams
  15. Wätjen, H.-J.: Hypertextbasierte OPACs im World-wide Web (1996) 0.02
    0.01801833 = product of:
      0.054054987 = sum of:
        0.054054987 = weight(_text_:im in 5456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054054987 = score(doc=5456,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.37478244 = fieldWeight in 5456, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5456)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Hammwöhner, R.: Kognitive Plausibilität : vom Netz im (Hyper-) Text zum Netz im Kopf (1993) 0.02
    0.016987845 = product of:
      0.050963532 = sum of:
        0.050963532 = weight(_text_:im in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050963532 = score(doc=2936,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.35334828 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Markscheffel, B.: ¬Eine Entwurfsmethodik für Hypermedia-Systeme auf Basis des Spatial-Satellite-Modells S**2M (1993) 0.02
    0.016987845 = product of:
      0.050963532 = sum of:
        0.050963532 = weight(_text_:im in 2244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050963532 = score(doc=2244,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.35334828 = fieldWeight in 2244, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2244)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Komplexität des Entwurfs von Hypermedia-Systemen ist vergleichbar mit der Komplexität des Entwurfs von Expertensystemen, verlangt also nach einer methodischen Unterstützung im Entwurfsprozeß. Von dieser Motivation ausgehend, wird im vorliegenden Beitrag zunächst eine Analyse bestehender Dokumentenmodellierungsansätze durchgeführt, dann ein Ansatz zur formalen Beschreibung von Hypertext-Strukturen vorgestellt und schließlich mit dem Spatial-Satellite-Modell ein Beschreibungsansatz für Hypermedia-Strukturen präsentiert. Ausgehend von diesem Modell wird eine Entwurfsmethodik für Hypermedia-Systeme entwickelt, die als Ausgangspunkt für die Entwicklung eines Verständnisses für die Notwendigkeit eines 'Hypermedia-Engineering' bilden
  18. Kuhlen, R.; Bekavac, B.; Griesbaum, J.; Schütz, T.; Semar, W.: ENFORUM, ein Instrument des Wissensmanagements in Forschung und Ausbildung im Informationswesen (2002) 0.01
    0.014864365 = product of:
      0.044593092 = sum of:
        0.044593092 = weight(_text_:im in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044593092 = score(doc=928,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.30917975 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Konzeption von ENFORUM beruht auf einer verteilten Organisation der informationswissenschaftlichen Kompetenzzentren im deutschsprachigen Bereich und der kooperativen Erarbeitung von ENFORUM-Einträgen über elektronische Kommunikationsforen. ENFORUM wird zum einen in den wissenschaftlichen Kontext elektronischer Wörterbücher und Enzyklopädien eingeordnet, zum anderen werden Vor- und Nachteile asynchroner elektronischer Kommunikation diskutiert, mit dem Ergebnis, dass die Kompensationsleistung von Moderatoren in Kommunikationsforen für den Erfolg der Diskurse unabdingbar ist. Der aktuelle Stand von ENFORUM (März 2002) wird vorgestellt. ENFORUM ist ein voll operatives System mit adaptiver Benutzerverwaltung, flexiblen Such- und Navigationsformen und ersten Funktionen in Richtung Wissensplattform. Überlegungen zur funktionalen Weiterentwicklung von ENFORUM und zum Einsatz in der Ausbildung schließen den Artikel ab.
  19. Baião Salgado Silva, G.; Lima, G.Â. Borém de Oliveira: Using topic maps in establishing compatibility of semantically structured hypertext contents (2012) 0.01
    0.013412262 = product of:
      0.040236786 = sum of:
        0.040236786 = product of:
          0.06035518 = sum of:
            0.025790809 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025790809 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
            0.03456437 = weight(_text_:22 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456437 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considering the characteristics of hypertext systems and problems such as cognitive overload and the disorientation of users, this project studies subject hypertext documents that have undergone conceptual structuring using facets for content representation and improvement of information retrieval during navigation. The main objective was to assess the possibility of the application of topic map technology for automating the compatibilization process of these structures. For this purpose, two dissertations from the UFMG Information Science Post-Graduation Program were adopted as samples. Both dissertations had been duly analyzed and structured on the MHTX (Hypertextual Map) prototype database. The faceted structures of both dissertations, which had been represented in conceptual maps, were then converted into topic maps. It was then possible to use the merge property of the topic maps to promote the semantic interrelationship between the maps and, consequently, between the hypertextual information resources proper. The merge results were then analyzed in the light of theories dealing with the compatibilization of languages developed within the realm of information technology and librarianship from the 1960s on. The main goals accomplished were: (a) the detailed conceptualization of the merge process of the topic maps, considering the possible compatibilization levels and the applicability of this technology in the integration of faceted structures; and (b) the production of a detailed sequence of steps that may be used in the implementation of topic maps based on faceted structures.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:39:23
  20. Beling, J.: Hypertext: eine Anwendung (1990) 0.01
    0.0130541995 = product of:
      0.0391626 = sum of:
        0.0391626 = product of:
          0.11748779 = sum of:
            0.11748779 = weight(_text_:online in 275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11748779 = score(doc=275,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.75872535 = fieldWeight in 275, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=275)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    11. Online-Frühjahrstagung der Online-Benutzergruppe der DGD: Proceedings

Years

Languages

  • e 119
  • d 28
  • f 1
  • pl 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…