-
Stock, W.G.: Semantische Vagheiten im Lichte der dreiwertigen Logik, der Superbewertung und der unscharfen Logik (1988)
0.02
0.021021385 = product of:
0.06306415 = sum of:
0.06306415 = weight(_text_:im in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06306415 = score(doc=2730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.4372462 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980)
0.01
0.012289554 = product of:
0.03686866 = sum of:
0.03686866 = product of:
0.110605985 = sum of:
0.110605985 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110605985 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
-
Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Wichtigkeit wissenschaftlicher Dokumente relativ zu gegebenen Thematiken (1981)
0.00
0.004011904 = product of:
0.012035711 = sum of:
0.012035711 = product of:
0.03610713 = sum of:
0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03610713 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Scientific documents are more or less important in relation to give subjects and this importance can be measured. An empirical investigation into philosophical information was carried out using a weighting algorithm developed by N. Henrichs which results in a distribution by weighting of documents on an average philosophical subject. With the aid of statistical methods a threshold value can be obtained that separates the important and unimportant documents on a subject. The knowledge of theis threshold value is important for various practical and theoretic questions: providing new possibilities for research strategy in information retrieval; evaluation of the 'titleworthiness' of subjects by comparison of document titles and themes for which the document at hand is important; and making available data on thematic trends for scientific results