Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.025481766 = product of:
  0.0764453 = sum of:
    0.0764453 = weight(_text_:im in 5822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0764453 = score(doc=5822,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.53002244 = fieldWeight in 5822, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5822)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.021234807 = product of:
  0.063704416 = sum of:
    0.063704416 = weight(_text_:im in 2394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063704416 = score(doc=2394,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.44168535 = fieldWeight in 2394, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2394)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Inhalt: Normdateien in Theorie und Praxis - Übersicht: Normdateien in Deutschland - Exkurs: Normdateien im Ausland - Normdateien im Bibliotheksverbund Niedersachsen / Sachsen-Anhalt / Thüringen - Zusammenfassung und Ausblick. Hausarbeit zur Prüfung für den höheren Bibliotheksdienst

0.01075336 = product of:
  0.03226008 = sum of:
    0.03226008 = product of:
      0.09678023 = sum of:
        0.09678023 = weight(_text_:22 in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09678023 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

24. 5.2001 19:22:37

0.008076874 = product of:
  0.02423062 = sum of:
    0.02423062 = product of:
      0.07269186 = sum of:
        0.07269186 = weight(_text_:online in 5353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07269186 = score(doc=5353,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 5353, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5353)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Argues that the efforts to achieve authority control in online catalogues are both misguided and counterproductive. Contrasts the characteristics of manual and online catalogues, demonstrating that although authority control may be beneficial in a traditional, manually produced catalogue, it is of little or no value in the online environment. Suggests that in future authority control may be dispensed with, thus releasing professional library staff from routine cataloguing tasks and leading to a greater integration of library services

0.007994032 = product of:
  0.023982096 = sum of:
    0.023982096 = product of:
      0.071946286 = sum of:
        0.071946286 = weight(_text_:online in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071946286 = score(doc=2915,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.4646225 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Analyzes user requests resulting in zero hits for author searches in online catalogs. Discusses the need for bibliographic records relating to a name to brought together under one form of the name and the need for cross references from variant forms of the name. Presents data which prove that linked bibliographic/authority files and the availability of see references online in the OPAC reduce the number of times that author searches produce zero hits

0.0069230343 = product of:
  0.020769102 = sum of:
    0.020769102 = product of:
      0.062307306 = sum of:
        0.062307306 = weight(_text_:online in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062307306 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.0069230343 = product of:
  0.020769102 = sum of:
    0.020769102 = product of:
      0.062307306 = sum of:
        0.062307306 = weight(_text_:online in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062307306 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.005769195 = product of:
  0.017307585 = sum of:
    0.017307585 = product of:
      0.051922753 = sum of:
        0.051922753 = weight(_text_:online in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051922753 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Multi-sprachige, multi-charakter Fragestellungen für die Online-Umgebung: Vorträge, von einer Arbeitsgruppe von der IFLA Sektion für Katalogisierung finanziert, Istanbul, Türkei, 24.8.1999. Ed.: J.D. Byrum u. O. Madison

0.002307678 = product of:
  0.006923034 = sum of:
    0.006923034 = product of:
      0.0207691 = sum of:
        0.0207691 = weight(_text_:online in 1240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0207691 = score(doc=1240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 1240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1240)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Project has developed a content standard for gazetteer objects and a hierarchical type scheme for geographic features. Both of these developments are based on ADL experience with an earlier gazetteer component for the Library, based on two gazetteers maintained by the U.S. federal government. We define the minimum components of a gazetteer entry as (1) a geographic name, (2) a geographic location represented by coordinates, and (3) a type designation. With these attributes, a gazetteer can function as a tool for indirect spatial location identification through names and types. The ADL Gazetteer Content Standard supports contribution and sharing of gazetteer entries with rich descriptions beyond the minimum requirements. This paper describes the content standard, the feature type thesaurus, and the implementation and research issues. A gazetteer is list of geographic names, together with their geographic locations and other descriptive information. A geographic name is a proper name for a geographic place and feature, such as Santa Barbara County, Mount Washington, St. Francis Hospital, and Southern California. There are many types of printed gazetteers. For example, the New York Times Atlas has a gazetteer section that can be used to look up a geographic name and find the page(s) and grid reference(s) where the corresponding feature is shown. Some gazetteers provide information about places and features; for example, a history of the locale, population data, physical data such as elevation, or the pronunciation of the name. Some lists of geographic names are available as hierarchical term sets (thesauri) designed for information retreival; these are used to describe bibliographic or museum materials. Examples include the authority files of the U.S. Library of Congress and the GeoRef Thesaurus produced by the American Geological Institute. The Getty Museum has recently made their Thesaurus of Geographic Names available online. This is a major project to develop a controlled vocabulary of current and historical names to describe (i.e., catalog) art and architecture literature. U.S. federal government mapping agencies maintain gazetteers containing the official names of places and/or the names that appear on map series. Examples include the U.S. Geological Survey's Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency's Geographic Names Processing System (GNPS). Both of these are maintained in cooperation with the U.S. Board of Geographic Names (BGN). Many other examples could be cited -- for local areas, for other countries, and for special purposes. There is remarkable diversity in approaches to the description of geographic places and no standardization beyond authoritative sources for the geographic names themselves.