Search (1515 results, page 1 of 76)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.11
    0.11077856 = product of:
      0.16616784 = sum of:
        0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027027493 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.13914035 = sum of:
          0.04405792 = weight(_text_:online in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04405792 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051022716 = queryNorm
              0.284522 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.05360519 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05360519 = score(doc=3697,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051022716 = queryNorm
              0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04147724 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051022716 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.10
    0.09567442 = product of:
      0.14351162 = sum of:
        0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027027493 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
        0.11648413 = sum of:
          0.04405792 = weight(_text_:online in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04405792 = score(doc=4144,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051022716 = queryNorm
              0.284522 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03094897 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051022716 = queryNorm
              0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04147724 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051022716 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Exploring collections by their subject matter is an important functionality for library users. We developed an online tool called SciGator in order to allow users to browse the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) classes used in different libraries at the University of Pavia and to perform different types of search in the OPAC. Besides navigation of DDC hierarchies, SciGator suggests "see-also" relationships with related classes and maps equivalent classes in local shelving schemes, thus allowing the expansion of search queries to include subjects contiguous to the initial one. We are developing new features, including the possibility to expand searches even more to national and international catalogues.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Fujita, M.; Lopes, L.; Moreira, W.; Piovezan dos Santos, L.B.; Andrade e Cruz, M.C.; Rodrigues de Barros Ribas, R.: Construction and evaluation of hierarchical structures of indexing languages for online catalogs of libraries : an experience of the São Paulo State University (UNESP) (2018) 0.07
    0.06570852 = product of:
      0.09856277 = sum of:
        0.031852208 = weight(_text_:im in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031852208 = score(doc=4307,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.22084267 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
        0.06671056 = product of:
          0.10006584 = sum of:
            0.06359213 = weight(_text_:online in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06359213 = score(doc=4307,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.41067213 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
            0.03647371 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03647371 = score(doc=4307,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The construction and updating of indexing languages depend on the organization of their hierarchical structures in order to determine the classification of related terms and, above all, to allow a constant updating of vocabulary, a condition for knowledge evolution. The elaboration of an indexing language for online catalogs of libraries' networks is important considering the diversity and specificity of knowledge areas. From this perspective, the present paper reports on the work of a team of catalogers and researchers engaged in the construction of a hierarchical structure of an indexing language for an online catalog of a university library's network. The work on hierarchical structures began by defining the categories and subcategories that form the indexing language macrostructure by using the parameters of the Library of Congress Subject Headings , the National Library Terminology and the Vocabulary of the University of São Paulo Library's system. Throughout the stages of the elaboration process of the macrostructure, difficulties and improvements were observed and discussed. The results enabled the assessment of the hierarchical structures of the languages used in the organization of the superordinate and subordinate terms, which has contributed to the systematization of operational procedures contained in an indexing language manual for online catalogs of libraries.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  4. Oh, K.E.; Joo, S.; Jeong, E.-J.: Online consumer health information organization : users' perspectives on faceted navigation (2015) 0.06
    0.06386131 = product of:
      0.095791966 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 2197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=2197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 2197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2197)
        0.073269054 = product of:
          0.109903574 = sum of:
            0.07342987 = weight(_text_:online in 2197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07342987 = score(doc=2197,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.47420335 = fieldWeight in 2197, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2197)
            0.03647371 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03647371 = score(doc=2197,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 2197, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2197)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We investigate facets of online health information that are preferred, easy-to-use and useful in accessing online consumer health information from a user's perspective. In this study, the existing classification structure of 20 top ranked consumer health information websites in South Korea were analyzed, and nine facets that are used in organizing health information in those websites were identified. Based on the identified facets, an online survey, which asked participants' preferences for as well as perceived ease-of-use and usefulness of each facet in accessing online health information, was conducted. The analysis of the survey results showed that among the nine facets, the "diseases & conditions" and "body part" facets were most preferred, and perceived as easy-to-use and useful in accessing online health information. In contrast, "age," "gender," and "alternative medicine" facets were perceived as relatively less preferred, easy-to-use and useful. This research study has direct implications for organization and design of health information websites in that it suggests facets to include and avoid in organizing and providing access points to online health information.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  5. Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.06
    0.059913844 = product of:
      0.089870766 = sum of:
        0.031532075 = weight(_text_:im in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031532075 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
        0.058338694 = product of:
          0.08750804 = sum of:
            0.051400907 = weight(_text_:online in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051400907 = score(doc=2007,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In their 2005 study, Gross and Taylor found that more than a third of records retrieved by keyword searches would be lost without subject headings. A review of the literature since then shows that numerous studies, in various disciplines, have found that a quarter to a third of records returned in a keyword search would be lost without controlled vocabulary. Other writers, though, have continued to suggest that controlled vocabulary be discontinued. Addressing criticisms of the Gross/Taylor study, this study replicates the search process in the same online catalog, but after the addition of automated enriched metadata such as tables of contents and summaries. The proportion of results that would be lost remains high.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.06
    0.05568893 = product of:
      0.08353339 = sum of:
        0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027027493 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
        0.0565059 = product of:
          0.08475885 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
            0.05360519 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05360519 = score(doc=310,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  7. Julien, C.-A.; Guastavino, C.; Bouthillier, F.: Capitalizing on information organization and information visualization for a new-generation catalogue (2012) 0.05
    0.054302596 = product of:
      0.08145389 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=5567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
        0.058930974 = product of:
          0.08839646 = sum of:
            0.051922753 = weight(_text_:online in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051922753 = score(doc=5567,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
            0.03647371 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03647371 = score(doc=5567,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Subject searching is difficult with traditional text-based online public access library catalogues (OPACs), and the next-generation discovery layers are keyword searching and result filtering tools that offer little support for subject browsing. Next-generation OPACs ignore the rich network of relations offered by controlled subject vocabulary, which can facilitate subject browsing. A new generation of OPACs could leverage existing information-organization investments and offer online searchers a novel browsing and searching environment. This is a case study of the design and development of a virtual reality subject browsing and information retrieval tool. The functional prototype shows that the Library of Congress subject headings (LCSH) can be shaped into a useful and usable tree structure serving as a visual metaphor that contains a real world collection from the domain of science and engineering. Formative tests show that users can effectively browse the LCSH tree and carve it up based on their keyword search queries. This study uses a complex information-organization structure as a defining characteristic of an OPAC that goes beyond the standard keyword search model, toward the cutting edge of online search tools.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  8. Losee, R.M.: Improving collection browsing : small world networking and Gray code ordering (2017) 0.05
    0.05376309 = product of:
      0.08064464 = sum of:
        0.031852208 = weight(_text_:im in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031852208 = score(doc=5148,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.22084267 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
        0.048792433 = product of:
          0.07318865 = sum of:
            0.036714934 = weight(_text_:online in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036714934 = score(doc=5148,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
            0.03647371 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03647371 = score(doc=5148,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  9. Fagan, J.C.: Usability studies of faceted browsing : a literature review (2010) 0.05
    0.053222746 = product of:
      0.07983412 = sum of:
        0.031532075 = weight(_text_:im in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031532075 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
        0.04830204 = product of:
          0.07245306 = sum of:
            0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03634593 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  10. Ashton, J.; Kent, C.: New approaches to subject indexing at the British Library (2017) 0.05
    0.053222746 = product of:
      0.07983412 = sum of:
        0.031532075 = weight(_text_:im in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031532075 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
        0.04830204 = product of:
          0.07245306 = sum of:
            0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03634593 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  11. Walsh, J.: ¬The use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in digital collections (2011) 0.05
    0.052576613 = product of:
      0.07886492 = sum of:
        0.01801833 = weight(_text_:im in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01801833 = score(doc=4549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.12492748 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
        0.06084659 = product of:
          0.09126988 = sum of:
            0.029371947 = weight(_text_:online in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029371947 = score(doc=4549,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.18968134 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
            0.061897933 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061897933 = score(doc=4549,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.40105084 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper attempts to explain the wide dissemination of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) within digital libraries and presents some of the advantages and disadvantages of using this controlled vocabulary in digital collections. The paper also presents other classifications used in digital collections for subject access and explores ways of improving search functionality in digital collections that employ LCSH. Design/methodology/approach - Unlike traditional libraries that use Library of Congress Classification for organization and retrieval, digital libraries use metadata forms for organization and retrieval. The collections exist in cyberspace of the internet which is known for containing the universe of knowledge. The use of LCSH for information retrieval has been widely criticized for its difficulty of use and its information retrieval effectiveness in online environments. The Library of Congress (LOC) has claimed the headings were not based on comprehensive principles nor ever intended to cover the universe of knowledge. Despite these claims and criticisms, LCSH is the most popular choice for subject access in digital libraries. Findings - The number of digital collections increases every year and LCSH is still the most popular choice of controlled vocabulary for subject access. Of the numerous criticisms, difficulties of use and user unfamiliarity are the greatest disadvantages of using LCSH for subject access. Average users only have a vague notion of what they are looking for when initializing a search. More work is required in automated generation of subject headings and increased usage of LCSH in faceted search retrieval systems. This will provide users with better access to the LCSH used in the back end of information retrieval. Originality/value - The Greek researchers who developed the Dissertation DSPace system believe this type of module will eventually replace the traditional keyword-based indexing back ends employed by many information retrieval modules within current digital library systems. The system offers the type of access and interactivity that will acquaint users with how LCSH looks and is used. Faceted search and automated pattern matching using an ontology based on LCSH have the best promise of overcoming the disadvantages that have always plagued the LOC-controlled vocabulary. These retrieval techniques give LCSH an opportunity to finally achieve the optimal precision and recall it has so far failed to deliver.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  12. Mu, X.; Lu, K.; Ryu, H.: Explicitly integrating MeSH thesaurus help into health information retrieval systems : an empirical user study (2014) 0.05
    0.052184783 = product of:
      0.07827717 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
        0.055754256 = product of:
          0.08363138 = sum of:
            0.025961377 = weight(_text_:online in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025961377 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
            0.05767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05767 = score(doc=2703,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    When consumers search for health information, a major obstacle is their unfamiliarity with the medical terminology. Even though medical thesauri such as the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and related tools (e.g., the MeSH Browser) were created to help consumers find medical term definitions, the lack of direct and explicit integration of these help tools into a health retrieval system prevented them from effectively achieving their objectives. To explore this issue, we conducted an empirical study with two systems: One is a simple interface system supporting query-based searching; the other is an augmented system with two new components supporting MeSH term searching and MeSH tree browsing. A total of 45 subjects were recruited to participate in the study. The results indicated that the augmented system is more effective than the simple system in terms of improving user-perceived topic familiarity and question-answer performance, even though we did not find users spend more time on the augmented system. The two new MeSH help components played a critical role in participants' health information retrieval and were found to allow them to develop new search strategies. The findings of the study enhanced our understanding of consumers' search behaviors and shed light on the design of future health information retrieval systems.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  13. Yi, K.; Chan, L.M.: Revisiting the syntactical and structural analysis of Library of Congress Subject Headings for the digital environment (2010) 0.05
    0.051317047 = product of:
      0.07697557 = sum of:
        0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027027493 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
        0.049948074 = product of:
          0.07492211 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
            0.043768454 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043768454 = score(doc=3431,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    With the current information environment characterized by the proliferation of digital resources, including collaboratively created and shared resources, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is facing the challenges of effective and efficient subject-based organization and retrieval of digital resources. To explore the feasibility of utilizing LCSH in a digital environment, we might need to revisit its basic characteristics. The objectives of our study were to analyze LCSH in both syntactic and relational structures, to discover the structural characteristics of LCSH, and to identify problems and issues for the feasibility of LCSH as an effective subject access tool. This study reports and discusses issues raised by the syntactic and hierarchical structures of LCSH that present challenges to its use in a networked environment. Given the results of this study, we recommend a number of provisional future directions for the development of LCSH towards further becoming a viable system for digital and networked resources.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  14. Wang, Z.; Khoo, C.S.G.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Evaluation of the navigation effectiveness of an organizational taxonomy built on a general classification scheme and domain thesauri (2014) 0.05
    0.051317047 = product of:
      0.07697557 = sum of:
        0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027027493 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
        0.049948074 = product of:
          0.07492211 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
            0.043768454 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043768454 = score(doc=1251,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  15. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.05
    0.051317047 = product of:
      0.07697557 = sum of:
        0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027027493 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
        0.049948074 = product of:
          0.07492211 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
            0.043768454 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043768454 = score(doc=3102,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  16. Julien, C.-A.; Tirilly, P.; Leide, J.E.; Guastavino, C.: Using the LCSH hierarchy to browse a collection (2012) 0.05
    0.04947883 = product of:
      0.07421824 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
        0.05169533 = product of:
          0.07754299 = sum of:
            0.025961377 = weight(_text_:online in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025961377 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
            0.051581617 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051581617 = score(doc=834,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is a subject structure used to index large collections throughout the world. Browsing a collection through LCSH is difficult using current on-line tools in part because they are inadequately integrated with information collections. Users of these LCSH browsing tools are expected to find a promising LCSH string before using it to search for the information itself; many users do not have the patience for such a two-step process. This article proposes a method to fully integrate a specific collection in its subset of the LCSH hierarchy in order to facilitate LCSH browsing as well as information retrieval. Techniques are described to match LCSH strings assigned to the collection with an established string from the authority records, and build their specific LCSH hierarchy. The resulting subset of LCSH structure is described in terms of its size and broader/narrower term statistics, and implications for browsing and information retrieval are discussed. The results of this research have implications for institutions wishing to further capitalize on existing LCSH organization investments for the purpose of subject browsing and information retrieval.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  17. Ahn, J.-w.; Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive visualization for exploratory information retrieval (2013) 0.05
    0.04947883 = product of:
      0.07421824 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
        0.05169533 = product of:
          0.07754299 = sum of:
            0.025961377 = weight(_text_:online in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025961377 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
            0.051581617 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051581617 = score(doc=2717,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As the volume and breadth of online information is rapidly increasing, ad hoc search systems become less and less efficient to answer information needs of modern users. To support the growing complexity of search tasks, researchers in the field of information developed and explored a range of approaches that extend the traditional ad hoc retrieval paradigm. Among these approaches, personalized search systems and exploratory search systems attracted many followers. Personalized search explored the power of artificial intelligence techniques to provide tailored search results according to different user interests, contexts, and tasks. In contrast, exploratory search capitalized on the power of human intelligence by providing users with more powerful interfaces to support the search process. As these approaches are not contradictory, we believe that they can re-enforce each other. We argue that the effectiveness of personalized search systems may be increased by allowing users to interact with the system and learn/investigate the problem in order to reach the final goal. We also suggest that an interactive visualization approach could offer a good ground to combine the strong sides of personalized and exploratory search approaches. This paper proposes a specific way to integrate interactive visualization and personalized search and introduces an adaptive visualization based search system Adaptive VIBE that implements it. We tested the effectiveness of Adaptive VIBE and investigated its strengths and weaknesses by conducting a full-scale user study. The results show that Adaptive VIBE can improve the precision and the productivity of the personalized search system while helping users to discover more diverse sets of information.
    Footnote
    Beitrag im Rahmen einer Special section on Human-computer Information Retrieval.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  18. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2014) 0.05
    0.046407443 = product of:
      0.06961116 = sum of:
        0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022522911 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
        0.047088247 = product of:
          0.07063237 = sum of:
            0.025961377 = weight(_text_:online in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025961377 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
            0.04467099 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04467099 = score(doc=1970,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve searching by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users' searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST prototype complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  19. Schmolz, H.: Anaphora resolution and text retrieval : a lnguistic analysis of hypertexts (2013) 0.05
    0.046241086 = product of:
      0.06936163 = sum of:
        0.045045823 = weight(_text_:im in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045045823 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
        0.024315808 = product of:
          0.07294742 = sum of:
            0.07294742 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07294742 = score(doc=1810,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Trägerin des VFI-Dissertationspreises 2014: "Überzeugende gründliche linguistische und quantitative Analyse eines im Information Retrieval bisher wenig beachteten Textelementes anhand eines eigens erstellten grossen Hypertextkorpus, einschliesslich der Evaluation selbsterstellter Auflösungsregeln für die Nutzung in künftigen IR-Systemen.".
  20. Tirilly, P.; Julien, C.-A.: Random walks for subject hierarchy simplification (2012) 0.05
    0.0456195 = product of:
      0.06842925 = sum of:
        0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027027493 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
        0.04140175 = product of:
          0.062102623 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
            0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03094897 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval

Types

  • a 1344
  • m 114
  • el 94
  • s 42
  • x 16
  • n 7
  • b 5
  • i 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications