Lindenthal, J.; Scheven, J.E.: ISO 25964 - Standard der Information und Dokumentation (2013)
0.24
0.24314687 = product of:
0.29177624 = sum of:
0.04070958 = weight(_text_:und in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04070958 = score(doc=916,freq=14.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07342099 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.04160709 = weight(_text_:des in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04160709 = score(doc=916,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.31797147 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259437 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.37939 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.03344421 = product of:
0.06688842 = sum of:
0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06688842 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Ein neuer internationaler Standard der Information und Dokumentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (ISO 25964) ist in Vorbereitung. Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval wurde Mitte August als DIS 25964-1 im ISO Central Secretariat eingereicht. Die Motivation zur Entwicklung eines neuen Vokabularstandards sowie die wesentlichen Änderungen und Erweiterungen gegenüber ISO 2788/ISO 5964 werden vorgestellt. Anhand des Datenmodells zu Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval werden die grundlegenden Elemente, Attribute und Relationen kurz erläutert. Mit der Arbeit an Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies wurde Ende Juni 2009 begonnen. Es sollen Richtlinien erarbeitet werden, um Interoperabilität zwischen Thesauri und anderen Vokabularien wie Normdateien für Namen, Schlagwortlisten, Ontologien, Klassifikationen und dgl. zu gewähren. Der erste Commitee Draft (CD 25964-2) ist für Juni 2010 geplant. Über den Stand der Entwicklung des 2. Teiles wird kurz referiert.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Kless, D.; Milton, S.; Kazmierczak, E.; Lindenthal, J.: Thesaurus and ontology structure : formal and pragmatic differences and similarities (2015)
0.21
0.20648976 = product of:
0.24778771 = sum of:
0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012822312 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061184157 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020018218 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08549531 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.06826771 = product of:
0.13653542 = sum of:
0.13653542 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13653542 = score(doc=2036,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.62530804 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Thesauri and other types of controlled vocabularies are increasingly re-engineered into ontologies described using the Web Ontology Language (OWL), particularly in the life sciences. This has led to the perception by some that thesauri are ontologies once they are described by using the syntax of OWL while others have emphasized the need to re-engineer a vocabulary to use it as ontology. This confusion is rooted in different perceptions of what ontologies are and how they differ from other types of vocabularies. In this article, we rigorously examine the structural differences and similarities between thesauri and meaning-defining ontologies described in OWL. Specifically, we conduct (a) a conceptual comparison of thesauri and ontologies, and (b) a comparison of a specific thesaurus and a specific ontology in the same subject field. Our results show that thesauri and ontologies need to be treated as 2 orthogonal kinds of models with superficially similar structures. An ontology is not a good thesaurus, nor is a thesaurus a good ontology. A thesaurus requires significant structural and other content changes to become an ontology, and vice versa.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
