Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lupovici, C."
  • × language_ss:"f"
  1. Lupovici, C.: ¬Le digital object identifier : le système du DOI (1998) 0.02
    0.023773804 = product of:
      0.07132141 = sum of:
        0.03963405 = weight(_text_:des in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03963405 = score(doc=2747,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.302893 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
        0.03168736 = product of:
          0.06337472 = sum of:
            0.06337472 = weight(_text_:22 in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06337472 = score(doc=2747,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.1999 19:29:22
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The digital Object Identifier: the DOI system
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 43(1998) no.3, S.49-54
  2. Lupovici, C.: ¬La conversion rétrospective des catalogues (1991) 0.01
    0.009436679 = product of:
      0.056620073 = sum of:
        0.056620073 = weight(_text_:des in 6580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056620073 = score(doc=6580,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.43270433 = fieldWeight in 6580, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6580)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 36(1991) no.1, S.25-31
  3. Lupovici, C.: ¬L' information bibliographique des documents electroniques (1998) 0.01
    0.008090267 = product of:
      0.0485416 = sum of:
        0.0485416 = weight(_text_:des in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0485416 = score(doc=3200,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3709667 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Bibliographic information on electronic documents
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 43(1998) no.4, S.42-47
  4. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.01
    0.006605675 = product of:
      0.03963405 = sum of:
        0.03963405 = weight(_text_:des in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03963405 = score(doc=892,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.302893 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Secondary information on primary documents: MARC or SGML format?
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.68-72