Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tudhope, D."
  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.45
    0.445449 = product of:
      0.5345388 = sum of:
        0.025644625 = weight(_text_:und in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025644625 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.12236831 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12236831 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5349128 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.040036436 = weight(_text_:des in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040036436 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.17099062 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17099062 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.6323167 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.17549883 = sum of:
          0.11148069 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11148069 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04725067 = queryNorm
              0.5105618 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.06401814 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06401814 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04725067 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Faceted thesauri (2008) 0.28
    0.2765202 = product of:
      0.33182424 = sum of:
        0.0205157 = weight(_text_:und in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0205157 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
        0.097894646 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097894646 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
        0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03202915 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
        0.1367925 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1367925 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.50585335 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
        0.044592276 = product of:
          0.08918455 = sum of:
            0.08918455 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08918455 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Still quite popular after all those years : the continued relevance of the information retrieval thesaurus (2016) 0.25
    0.2477877 = product of:
      0.29734525 = sum of:
        0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015386774 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
        0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07342099 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
        0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02402186 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
        0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10259437 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37939 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
        0.08192125 = product of:
          0.1638425 = sum of:
            0.1638425 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1638425 = score(doc=2908,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.7503696 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    The recent ISKO-UK conference considered the question of whether the traditional thesaurus has any place in modern information retrieval. This note is intended to continue in the spirit of that good-natured debate, arguing that there is indeed a role today and highlighting some recent work showing the continued relevance of the thesaurus, particularly in the linked data area. Key functionality that a thesaurus makes possible is discussed. A brief outline is provided of prominent work hat employs thesauri in three key areas of infrastructure underpinning advanced retrieval functionality today: metadata enrichment,vocabulary mapping and web services.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001) 0.22
    0.21529064 = product of:
      0.25834876 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
        0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061184157 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
        0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020018218 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
        0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08549531 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
        0.07882876 = product of:
          0.15765752 = sum of:
            0.15765752 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15765752 = score(doc=1520,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.7220435 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses issues concerning the augmentation of thesaurus relationships, in light of new application possibilities for retrieval. We first discuss a case study that explored the retrieval potential of an augmented set of thesaurus relationships by specialising standard relationships into richer subtypes, in particular hierarchical geographical containment and the associative relationship. We then locate this work in a broader context by reviewing various attempts to build taxonomies of thesaurus relationships, and conclude by discussing the feasibility of hierarchically augmenting the core set of thesaurus relationships, particularly the associative relationship. We discuss the possibility of enriching the specification and semantics of Related Term (RT relationships), while maintaining compatibility with traditional thesauri via a limited hierarchical extension of the associative (and hierarchical) relationships. This would be facilitated by distinguishing the type of term from the (sub)type of relationship and explicitly specifying semantic categories for terms following a faceted approach. We first illustrate how hierarchical spatial relationships can be used to provide more flexible retrieval for queries incorporating place names in applications employing online gazetteers and geographical thesauri. We then employ a set of experimental scenarios to investigate key issues affecting use of the associative (RT) thesaurus relationships in semantic distance measures. Previous work has noted the potential of RTs in thesaurus search aids but also the problem of uncontrolled expansion of query term sets. Results presented in this paper suggest the potential for taking account of the hierarchical context of an RT link and specialisations of the RT relationship
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus