Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Benediktsson, D.: Problems of subject access to Icelandic collections throughout OPACs (1990) 0.01

0.0074320463 = product of:
  0.044592276 = sum of:
    0.044592276 = product of:
      0.08918455 = sum of:
        0.08918455 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08918455 = score(doc=5546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 5546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract: Suggest reasons why there is no operational OPAC station yet in Iceland. Obstacles include the lack of compatability among computer systems adopted by the major libraries, the differing classification schemes used by them and the lack of a controlled indexing vocabulary or thesaurus for subject analysis in the Icelandic language. The Rejkjavik Municipal Library and the National Hospital Library, both users of the DOBIS/LIBIS system, will be the first users of a potential network of OPACs.

Czermak, J.-M.: Fachinformationspolitik : Deutschland (1995) 0.01

0.006838567 = product of:
  0.0410314 = sum of:
    0.0410314 = weight(_text_:und in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0410314 = score(doc=2327,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract: 10 Jahre cogito bedeuten auch 10 Jahre Fachinformationspolitik, die ich in einigen Abschnitten in cogito bereits früher dargestellt habe. Zum Jubiläum möchte ich ihre wesentlichen Grundzüge aus meiner Sicht skizzieren und Rückblick und Ausblick diesmal an der Marktentwicklung, der Produktion, dem Angebot und der Nutzung darstellen, wie es sich in einer Zeitschrift für den Informationsmarkt und einer sich entwickelnden Informationsgesellschaft anbietet

Burkhardt, F.W.: Quo vadis, Informationsgesellschaft? (1995) 0.01

0.006044496 = product of:
  0.036266975 = sum of:
    0.036266975 = weight(_text_:und in 2325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036266975 = score(doc=2325,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 2325, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2325)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract: Kaum jemand wird uns widersprechen, wenn wir sagen: Wir sind auf dem Weg zur Informationsgesellschaft. Vor zehn Jahren, als cogito gegründet wurde, war das schon genau so. Und wird es in weiteren 10 Jahren auch noch so sein? Wahrscheinlich! Wann wird sie endlich da sein, die Informationsgesellschaft? Wie sieht sie aus? Und was kommt danach? Wenn ich das wüßte!

Weckend, E.: Anwenders Ideal : Forderungen der entstehenden Information Community (1995) 0.00

0.0042741043 = product of:
  0.025644625 = sum of:
    0.025644625 = weight(_text_:und in 2326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025644625 = score(doc=2326,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 2326, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2326)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract: Die Nutzung von Online-Datenbanken war bis vor kurzem einem relativ kleinen Kreis von Spezialisten überlassen. Online ist heute jedoch für viele bereits zum Schlagwort einer neuen Kompetenz geworden, die die Bedeutung der elektronischen Informationsgewinnung als selbstverständliche Grundlage einer zeitgemäßen Entscheidungsfindung erkenntn und nutzt

Baguhn, J.: Volltextretrieval : stürmische Entwicklungen (1995) 0.00
```
0.0034192835 = product of:
  0.0205157 = sum of:
    0.0205157 = weight(_text_:und in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0205157 = score(doc=2329,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

10 Jahre cogito lassen auch uns auf diesen in der Branche langen Zeitraum zurückblicken. Der Informationsmarkt 1985 war noch gut überschaubar und von der PSI noch gar nicht als attraktiv erkannt. Doch schon zu diesem Zeitpunkt machten wir uns Gedanken über die Verarbeitung von unstrukturierten Informationen, da mehrere Nachrichtenverteilsysteme für größere Behörden relalisiert wurden. Die Wünsche der Benutzer waren mit herkömmlichen Datenbanken nur schwer zu realisieren oder die Zugriffszeiten zu lang
Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00
```
0.0016004534 = product of:
  0.00960272 = sum of:
    0.00960272 = product of:
      0.01920544 = sum of:
        0.01920544 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01920544 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Content

As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.

Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes