Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015) 0.17
    0.17282514 = product of:
      0.20739017 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
        0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061184157 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
        0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020018218 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
        0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08549531 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
        0.027870173 = product of:
          0.055740345 = sum of:
            0.055740345 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055740345 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.2552809 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Hudon, M.: Preparing terminological definitions for indexing and retrieval thesauri : a model (1996) 0.01
    0.012872683 = product of:
      0.07723609 = sum of:
        0.07723609 = product of:
          0.15447219 = sum of:
            0.15447219 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15447219 = score(doc=5193,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.7074553 = fieldWeight in 5193, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A model for standardizing existing definitions and/or writing new definitions for thesaurus descriptors has been developed, within the framework of a research project concerned with the usefulness of terminological definitions for indexers working with a thesaurus. The proposed model is an expansion of a model presented by Sager and L'Homme in 1994. Examples of its application in a thesaurus describing the field of Adult literacy programming and training are introduced
  3. Kolmayer, E.; Lavandier, J.; Roger, D.: Conceptual maps : users navigation through paradigmatic and syntagmatic links (1998) 0.01
    0.009196689 = product of:
      0.055180132 = sum of:
        0.055180132 = product of:
          0.110360265 = sum of:
            0.110360265 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110360265 = score(doc=58,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.50543046 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This experiment, focused on the users behaviour, aims to study the search topic representation they build and to highlight the role of a graphical thesaurus on their mental models and searching behaviour. The users expertise in the field is considered. The results show how difficult it is to structure a field; they also point out how much a graphical thesaurus could contribute to such a task, but also its restricted role in the query task. They urge us to think over which shape is proper to the conceptual interface and the variety of links that have to be taken into account
  4. Rahmstorf, G.: ¬An integrated conceptual representation for words and phrases (1992) 0.01
    0.0066727395 = product of:
      0.040036436 = sum of:
        0.040036436 = weight(_text_:des in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040036436 = score(doc=2415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Series
    Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 'Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen der Computerlinguistik': Bericht Nr.30-1992
  5. Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval (2002) 0.01
    0.0055740355 = product of:
      0.03344421 = sum of:
        0.03344421 = product of:
          0.06688842 = sum of:
            0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06688842 = score(doc=1201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Thesaural relations have long been used in information retrieval to enrich queries; they have sometimes been used to cluster documents as well. Sometimes the first query to an information retrieval system yields no results at all, or, what can be even more disconcerting, many thousands of hits. One solution is to rephrase the query, improving the choice of query terms by using related terms of different types. A collection of related terms is often called a thesaurus. This chapter describes the lexical-semantic relations that have been used in building thesauri and summarizes some of the effects of using these relational thesauri in information retrieval experiments
  6. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.00
    0.0037343912 = product of:
      0.022406347 = sum of:
        0.022406347 = product of:
          0.044812694 = sum of:
            0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044812694 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  7. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.00
    0.0026674224 = product of:
      0.016004534 = sum of:
        0.016004534 = product of:
          0.03200907 = sum of:
            0.03200907 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03200907 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  8. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.00
    0.0026674224 = product of:
      0.016004534 = sum of:
        0.016004534 = product of:
          0.03200907 = sum of:
            0.03200907 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03200907 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  9. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.00
    0.0026674224 = product of:
      0.016004534 = sum of:
        0.016004534 = product of:
          0.03200907 = sum of:
            0.03200907 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03200907 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.00
    0.0026674224 = product of:
      0.016004534 = sum of:
        0.016004534 = product of:
          0.03200907 = sum of:
            0.03200907 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03200907 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22
  11. Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009) 0.00
    0.0021370521 = product of:
      0.012822312 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)