-
Suominen, O.; Hyvönen, N.: From MARC silos to Linked Data silos? (2017)
0.03
0.029602587 = product of:
0.08880776 = sum of:
0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015386774 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07342099 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Seit einiger Zeit stellen Bibliotheken ihre bibliografischen Metadadaten verstärkt offen in Form von Linked Data zur Verfügung. Dabei kommen jedoch ganz unterschiedliche Modelle für die Strukturierung der bibliografischen Daten zur Anwendung. Manche Bibliotheken verwenden ein auf FRBR basierendes Modell mit mehreren Schichten von Entitäten, während andere flache, am Datensatz orientierte Modelle nutzen. Der Wildwuchs bei den Datenmodellen erschwert die Nachnutzung der bibliografischen Daten. Im Ergebnis haben die Bibliotheken die früheren MARC-Silos nur mit zueinander inkompatiblen Linked-Data-Silos vertauscht. Deshalb ist es häufig schwierig, Datensets miteinander zu kombinieren und nachzunutzen. Kleinere Unterschiede in der Datenmodellierung lassen sich zwar durch Schema Mappings in den Griff bekommen, doch erscheint es fraglich, ob die Interoperabilität insgesamt zugenommen hat. Der Beitrag stellt die Ergebnisse einer Studie zu verschiedenen veröffentlichten Sets von bibliografischen Daten vor. Dabei werden auch die unterschiedlichen Modelle betrachtet, um bibliografische Daten als RDF darzustellen, sowie Werkzeuge zur Erzeugung von entsprechenden Daten aus dem MARC-Format. Abschließend wird der von der Finnischen Nationalbibliothek verfolgte Ansatz behandelt.
-
Becker, H.-J.; Hengel, C.; Neuroth, H.; Weiß, B.; Wessel, C.: ¬Die Virtuelle Fachbibliothek als Schnittstelle für eine fachübergreifende Suche in den einzelnen Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken : Definition eines Metadaten-Kernsets (VLib Application Profile) (2002)
0.02
0.017142115 = product of:
0.051426344 = sum of:
0.031408124 = weight(_text_:und in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031408124 = score(doc=2856,freq=12.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.29991096 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020018218 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Der folgende Beitrag beschäftigt sich nicht mit einer konkreten Virtuellen Fachbibliothek, sondern mit dem übergreifenden Themenkomplex "Metadaten" und der Fragestellung, wie Metadaten für eine fachübergreifende Suche über alle Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken eingesetzt werden können. Im Rahmen des Aufbaus der Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken hat die Projektkoordinierung Unterarbeitsgruppen zur Lösung spezifischer Fragestellungen ins Leben gerufen. Der Arbeitsbereich "Metadaten" ist von dem von der DFG geförderten Projekt META-LIB (Metadaten-Initiative deutscher Bibliotheken) mit den Teilprojekten an Der Deutschen Bibliothek und der SUB Göttingen übernommen worden. META-LIB erhielt die Aufgabe, "Empfehlungen zur Definition eines Metadaten-Core-Sets für die verteilte Suche über die Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken" zu entwickeln. Im folgenden werden die Empfehlungen vorgestellt. Sie basieren auf den Ergebnissen und der Auswertung von Antworteng eines Internet-Fragebogens, in dem die Datenelemente erfragt wurden, die in den einzelnen Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken zur Erschließung verwendet bzw. benötigt werden. Für die Formulierung der Empfehlungen und zur Abstimmung sind zwei MetadatenWorkshops (am 16. Mai 2001 in der SUB Göttingen und am 9./10. August 2001 in der Deutschen Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main) durchgeführt worden, deren Ergebnisse und Diskussionen als Grundlage dienen.
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.01
0.009053532 = product of:
0.05432119 = sum of:
0.05432119 = product of:
0.10864238 = sum of:
0.10864238 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10864238 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.008535751 = product of:
0.051214505 = sum of:
0.051214505 = product of:
0.10242901 = sum of:
0.10242901 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10242901 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.0074687824 = product of:
0.044812694 = sum of:
0.044812694 = product of:
0.08962539 = sum of:
0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962539 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.01
0.0074687824 = product of:
0.044812694 = sum of:
0.044812694 = product of:
0.08962539 = sum of:
0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962539 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997)
0.01
0.006605675 = product of:
0.03963405 = sum of:
0.03963405 = weight(_text_:des in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03963405 = score(doc=892,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.302893 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Secondary information on primary documents: MARC or SGML format?
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.68-72
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.01
0.0060356874 = product of:
0.036214124 = sum of:
0.036214124 = product of:
0.07242825 = sum of:
0.07242825 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07242825 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.0060356874 = product of:
0.036214124 = sum of:
0.036214124 = product of:
0.07242825 = sum of:
0.07242825 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07242825 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.00
0.0042678756 = product of:
0.025607252 = sum of:
0.025607252 = product of:
0.051214505 = sum of:
0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051214505 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.00
0.0042678756 = product of:
0.025607252 = sum of:
0.025607252 = product of:
0.051214505 = sum of:
0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051214505 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.00
0.0042678756 = product of:
0.025607252 = sum of:
0.025607252 = product of:
0.051214505 = sum of:
0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051214505 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.00
0.0042678756 = product of:
0.025607252 = sum of:
0.025607252 = product of:
0.051214505 = sum of:
0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051214505 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.00
0.0037343912 = product of:
0.022406347 = sum of:
0.022406347 = product of:
0.044812694 = sum of:
0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044812694 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.00
0.0037343912 = product of:
0.022406347 = sum of:
0.022406347 = product of:
0.044812694 = sum of:
0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044812694 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004)
0.00
0.0037343912 = product of:
0.022406347 = sum of:
0.022406347 = product of:
0.044812694 = sum of:
0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044812694 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
-
Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004)
0.00
0.0032009068 = product of:
0.01920544 = sum of:
0.01920544 = product of:
0.03841088 = sum of:
0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03841088 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.00
0.0032009068 = product of:
0.01920544 = sum of:
0.01920544 = product of:
0.03841088 = sum of:
0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03841088 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.00
0.0032009068 = product of:
0.01920544 = sum of:
0.01920544 = product of:
0.03841088 = sum of:
0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03841088 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.00
0.0026674224 = product of:
0.016004534 = sum of:
0.016004534 = product of:
0.03200907 = sum of:
0.03200907 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03200907 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
