-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.61
0.61002433 = product of:
0.7320292 = sum of:
0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773548 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14684197 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.08321418 = weight(_text_:des in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08321418 = score(doc=6404,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.63594294 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.20518874 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20518874 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.75878 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.26601076 = sum of:
0.18918902 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18918902 = score(doc=6404,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.8664522 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.07682176 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07682176 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.56
0.5638475 = product of:
0.676617 = sum of:
0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773548 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14684197 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.08321418 = weight(_text_:des in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08321418 = score(doc=3773,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.63594294 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.20518874 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20518874 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.75878 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.2105986 = sum of:
0.13377684 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13377684 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.61267424 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.07682176 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07682176 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Gopinath, M.A.; Prasad, K.N.: Compatibility of the principles for design of thesaurus and classification scheme (1976)
0.44
0.4378687 = product of:
0.5254425 = sum of:
0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773548 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14684197 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04804372 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.20518874 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20518874 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.75878 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.09459451 = product of:
0.18918902 = sum of:
0.18918902 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18918902 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.8664522 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Soergel, D.E.: Klassifikationssysteme und Thesauri : Eine Anleitung zur Herstellung von Klassifikationssystemen und Thesauri im Bereich der Dokumentation (1969)
0.36
0.35852003 = product of:
0.43022406 = sum of:
0.05427944 = weight(_text_:und in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05427944 = score(doc=2020,freq=14.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.097894646 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097894646 = score(doc=2020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03202915 = score(doc=2020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.1367925 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1367925 = score(doc=2020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.50585335 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.10922833 = product of:
0.21845666 = sum of:
0.21845666 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21845666 = score(doc=2020,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
1.0004928 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Content
- Überblick über Aufgaben und Aufbau eines Thesaurus. Aufwand für Herstellung von Thesauri. Begriffe und Begriffsbenennungen. Klassifikationssystem und Thesaurus und ihre Funktionen in einem Dokumentationssystem. Thesaurus-Struktur. Thesaurus-Format. Arbeitsablauf der Thesaurus-Herstellung. Regeln für Begriffsbenennungen, Rechtschreibung u.ä. Weiterentwicklung von Thesauri. Thesauri als Grundlage für kooperative Dokumentation.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.08
0.08226665 = product of:
0.1645333 = sum of:
0.0410314 = weight(_text_:und in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0410314 = score(doc=4339,freq=8.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.097894646 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097894646 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.025607252 = product of:
0.051214505 = sum of:
0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051214505 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag skizziert die Grundlagen der Arbeit mit Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken und erläutert die Grundbegriffe der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie. Schwerpunkte bilden die Ordnungsprinzipien und Strukturierungsmittel von Klassifikationen sowie die verschiedenen Klassifikationstypologien. Dabei werden vorzugsweise Beispiele aus Klassifikationen verwendet, die im deutschen Sprachraum verbreitet sind.
- Pages
- S.1-22
- Series
- Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 53
- Source
- Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg.: H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.05
0.048971433 = product of:
0.09794287 = sum of:
0.035902474 = weight(_text_:und in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035902474 = score(doc=3494,freq=8.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.03963405 = weight(_text_:des in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03963405 = score(doc=3494,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.302893 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.022406347 = product of:
0.044812694 = sum of:
0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044812694 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Buchanan, B.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationstheorie (1989)
0.03
0.028163232 = product of:
0.084489696 = sum of:
0.029013582 = weight(_text_:und in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029013582 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.055476114 = weight(_text_:des in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055476114 = score(doc=3921,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.42396194 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Inhalt: Klassifikation: Definition und Einsatzmöglichkeiten - Die verschiedenen Arten von Klassenbeziehungen - Präkombinierte Klassifikationssysteme und Facettenklassifikationen - Methodische Überlegungen zur Lösung von Ordnungsproblemen - Konstruktion einer Facettenklassifikation, 1. Teil - Konstruktion einer Facettenklassifikation, 2. Teil - Gestaltung des Notationssystems, 1. Teil - Gestaltung des Notationssystems, 2. Teil - Gestaltung des Notationssystems, 3. Teil - Das alphabetische Sachregister - Universalklassifikationen - Kritische Anmerkungen zur systematischen Ordnung - Automatische Indexierung
-
Franz, S.; Lopatka, T.; Kunze, G.; Meyn, N.; Strupler, N.: Un/Doing Classification : Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme zwischen Universalitätsanspruch und reduktionistischer Wissensorganisation (2022)
0.03
0.025967881 = product of:
0.07790364 = sum of:
0.0458745 = weight(_text_:und in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0458745 = score(doc=675,freq=10.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.438048 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03202915 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Der multiperspektivische Beitrag analysiert mit einem intersektionalen und qualitativen Ansatz diskriminierende Begriffe, Auslassungen und implizit abwertende Strukturen bibliothekarischer Klassifikationen des Globalen Nordens. Am Beispiel der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) werden rassistische und sexistische Schnitt- sowie Leerstellen in der Repräsentation queerer Lebens-, Liebes- und Lustentwürfe aufgezeigt. Mögliche Lösungen unter Einbeziehung der Communitys runden den Beitrag ab.
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.02
0.023634437 = product of:
0.07090331 = sum of:
0.045296054 = weight(_text_:des in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045296054 = score(doc=1171,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.34616345 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.025607252 = product of:
0.051214505 = sum of:
0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051214505 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Concerning the Dewey classification
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Rescheleit, W.; Menner, L.: Vergleich der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL mit Dezimalklassifikation und Facettenklassifikation (1986)
0.02
0.022792637 = product of:
0.06837791 = sum of:
0.034405876 = weight(_text_:und in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034405876 = score(doc=1555,freq=10.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.328536 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.03397204 = weight(_text_:des in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03397204 = score(doc=1555,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.25962257 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Beim Vergleich von Klassifikationen mit Frame-Wissensbasen für Expertensysteme zeigen sich einige elementare Gemeinsamkeiten: Beide haben das Ziel einer geordneten Darstellung von Wissen. Beide bilden dazu Klassen und weisen hierarchische Beziehungen zwischen diesen Klassen auf. Anahnd der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL (Frame Representation Language) wird untersucht, inwieweit beide Systeme sich in das jeweils andere übertragen lassen. Die FRL speichert Wissen in einer speziellen Datenstruktur, den Frames, die aus einem Framenamen, der den jeweiligen Begriff bezeichnet, und Slots, die die Eigenschaften des Begriffs enthalten, bestehen. Eine effektive Speicherung des Wissens wird dadurch erreicht, daß die Frames in einer polyhierarchischen Struktur geordnet sind und in generischer Relation zueinander stehen müssen. Über die generische Relation lassen sich die Eigenschaften höherer Begriffe auf ihre Subklassen vererben. Es werden die Ergebnisse eines Versuchs dargestellt, Elemente bestehender Universalklassifikationen (DK, BC2) in die FRL zu übertragen
- Source
- Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
-
Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995)
0.02
0.022347918 = product of:
0.06704375 = sum of:
0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028025504 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.039018244 = product of:
0.07803649 = sum of:
0.07803649 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07803649 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Rethinking UDC
-
Engelien, G.: ¬Der Begriff der Klassifikation (1971)
0.02
0.021893688 = product of:
0.06568106 = sum of:
0.025644625 = weight(_text_:und in 3386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025644625 = score(doc=3386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3386)
0.040036436 = weight(_text_:des in 3386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040036436 = score(doc=3386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 3386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3386)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Series
- Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Kommunikationsforschung und Phonetik der Universität Bonn; Bd.36
-
Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014)
0.02
0.017549884 = product of:
0.1052993 = sum of:
0.1052993 = sum of:
0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06688842 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03841088 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995)
0.01
0.014624903 = product of:
0.087749414 = sum of:
0.087749414 = sum of:
0.055740345 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055740345 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2552809 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.03200907 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03200907 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
-
Negrini, G.; Zozi, P.: Ontological analysis of the literary work of art (2003)
0.01
0.009654513 = product of:
0.057927076 = sum of:
0.057927076 = product of:
0.11585415 = sum of:
0.11585415 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11585415 = score(doc=2687,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5305915 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Ontological structures can aid the understanding and modelling of works of art. Ontology of the aesthetic object, and particularly of the literary work, has been analysed by Hartmann and Ingarden. Application of Dahlberg's ontical 'systematifier' model enabled us to organize the entire structure of the Thesaurus of Italian Literature, and to highlight a number of significant aspects of the literary work. After describing the conclusions arising from the experience of compiling the thesaurus, the paper briefly outlines Hartmann's and Ingarden's theories of levels and seeks to identify commonalities between the ontological analysis of the two theories and the conclusions of the thesaurus.
-
Henrichs, N.: Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Bibliotheksklassifikation? (1979)
0.01
0.008883559 = product of:
0.053301353 = sum of:
0.053301353 = weight(_text_:und in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053301353 = score(doc=1423,freq=6.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
DIN 32705: Klassifikationssysteme: Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen (1987)
0.01
0.008883559 = product of:
0.053301353 = sum of:
0.053301353 = weight(_text_:und in 1653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053301353 = score(doc=1653,freq=6.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1653, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1653)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Vgl. zur Einführung in die Norm auch die Beiträge von W. Gödert: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme ... in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 11(1987) und I. Dahlberg: DIN 32705: ... in: International classification 19(1992)
-
DIN 2331: Begriffssysteme und ihre Darstellung (1980)
0.01
0.0085482085 = product of:
0.05128925 = sum of:
0.05128925 = weight(_text_:und in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05128925 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Gödert, W.: Strukturierung von Klassifikationssystemen und Online-Retrieval (1995)
0.01
0.0085482085 = product of:
0.05128925 = sum of:
0.05128925 = weight(_text_:und in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05128925 = score(doc=922,freq=8.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Imprint
- Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
- Source
- Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
-
Kluth, R.: Schlagwortindex und Schlagwortkatalog (1957)
0.01
0.008462295 = product of:
0.050773766 = sum of:
0.050773766 = weight(_text_:und in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050773766 = score(doc=273,freq=4.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 4(1957), S.169-176
