Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.32
    0.32300976 = product of:
      0.38761172 = sum of:
        0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015386774 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
        0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07342099 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
        0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02402186 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
        0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10259437 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37939 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
        0.17218772 = sum of:
          0.13377684 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13377684 = score(doc=1181,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04725067 = queryNorm
              0.61267424 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
          0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03841088 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04725067 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Gruber, A.: Vom Knüpfen feministischer Begriffsnetze : Ariadnes Faden & geschlechtersensible Normdaten (2022) 0.29
    0.29101098 = product of:
      0.34921318 = sum of:
        0.04014019 = weight(_text_:und in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04014019 = score(doc=577,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
        0.08565781 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08565781 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
        0.0485416 = weight(_text_:des in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0485416 = score(doc=577,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3709667 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
        0.11969343 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11969343 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.44262168 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
        0.055180132 = product of:
          0.110360265 = sum of:
            0.110360265 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110360265 = score(doc=577,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.50543046 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    Feministische Thesauri sind Begriffsnetze der Frauen*- und Geschlechterforschung, die in der bibliothekarischen Praxis jene Lücken schließen, die konventionelle Normdateien bei der Sacherschließung relevanter Literatur hinterlassen. Mit thesaurA wurde Mitte der 1990er Jahren der erste kooperative frauen*spezifische Fachthesaurus Österreichs erstellt. Der SAR-Index der Ariadne, der Frauen*- und Geschlechterdokumentationsstelle der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek (ÖNB), ist eine lokale Weiterentwicklung. Ein Wechsel des Bibliothekssystems an der ÖNB macht eine Migration des Vokabulars erforderlich. Der Beitrag beleuchtet das Migrationsprojekt im Kontext feministischer Beschlagwortung und entwickelt Überlegungen zu kooperativen Thesaurus-Projekten weiter, die unabhängig der fachlichen Ausrichtung Relevanz entfalten können.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 75(2022) H.1, S.262-288
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Gladun, A.; Rogushina, J.: Development of domain thesaurus as a set of ontology concepts with use of semantic similarity and elements of combinatorial optimization (2021) 0.27
    0.26575798 = product of:
      0.3189096 = sum of:
        0.017951237 = weight(_text_:und in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017951237 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
        0.08565781 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08565781 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
        0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028025504 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
        0.11969343 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11969343 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.44262168 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
        0.06758159 = product of:
          0.13516317 = sum of:
            0.13516317 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13516317 = score(doc=572,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.6190234 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    We consider use of ontological background knowledge in intelligent information systems and analyze directions of their reduction in compliance with specifics of particular user task. Such reduction is aimed at simplification of knowledge processing without loss of significant information. We propose methods of generation of task thesauri based on domain ontology that contain such subset of ontological concepts and relations that can be used in task solving. Combinatorial optimization is used for minimization of task thesaurus. In this approach, semantic similarity estimates are used for determination of concept significance for user task. Some practical examples of optimized thesauri application for semantic retrieval and competence analysis demonstrate efficiency of proposed approach.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Schulz, T.: Konzeption und prototypische Entwicklung eines Thesaurus für IT-Konzepte an Hochschulen (2021) 0.24
    0.23610324 = product of:
      0.28332388 = sum of:
        0.04623151 = weight(_text_:und in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04623151 = score(doc=429,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.441457 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
        0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061184157 = score(doc=429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
        0.03467257 = weight(_text_:des in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03467257 = score(doc=429,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2649762 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
        0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08549531 = score(doc=429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
        0.055740345 = product of:
          0.11148069 = sum of:
            0.11148069 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11148069 = score(doc=429,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.5105618 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    In Hochschulen besteht derzeit ein großes Anliegen, die Digitalisierung effektiv und effizient für Prozesse in Steuerungsbereichen zu nutzen. Dabei steht die IT-Governance im Mittelpunkt der hochschulpolitischen Überlegungen und beinhaltet "die interne Steuerung und Koordination von Entscheidungsprozessen in Bezug auf IT-Steuerung beziehungsweise Digitalisierungsmaßnahmen."(Christmann-Budian et al. 2018) Strategisch kann die Bündelung von Kompetenzen in der deutschen Hochschullandschaft dabei helfen, die steigenden Anforderungen an die IT-Governance zu erfüllen. Passend zu diesem Ansatz realisieren aktuell im ZDT zusammengeschlossene Hochschulen das Projekt "IT-Konzepte - Portfolio gemeinsamer Vorlagen und Muster". Das Projekt schließt an die Problemstellung an, indem Kompetenzen gebündelt und alle Hochschulen befähigt werden, IT-Konzepte erarbeiten und verabschieden zu können. Dazu wird ein Portfolio an Muster und Vorlagen als Ressourcenpool zusammengetragen und referenziert, um eine Nachvollziehbarkeit der Vielfalt an Herausgebern gewährleisten zu können (Meister 2020). Um den Ressourcenpool, welcher einen Body of Knowledge (BoK) darstellt, effizient durchsuchen zu können, ist eine sinnvolle Struktur unabdinglich. Daher setzt sich das Ziel der Bachelorarbeit aus der Analyse von hochschulinternen Dokumenten mithilfe von Natural Language Processing (NLP) und die daraus resultierende Entwicklung eines Thesaurus-Prototyps für IT-Konzepte zusammen. Dieser soll im Anschluss serialisiert und automatisiert werden, um diesen fortlaufend auf einem aktuellen Stand zu halten. Es wird sich mit der Frage beschäftigt, wie ein Thesaurus nachhaltig technologisch, systematisch und konsistent erstellt werden kann, um diesen Prozess im späteren Verlauf als Grundlage für weitere Themenbereiche einzuführen.
    Content
    Bachelorarbeit zur Erlangung des Grades Bachelor of Science Wirtschaftsinformatik des Fachbereichs Wirtschaft der Technischen Hochschule Brandenburg. Vgl. unter: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-fhbrb/files/2732/20210826_BT_SchulzTheresa.pdf.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Kempf, A.O.: Thesauri (2023) 0.23
    0.22597596 = product of:
      0.27117115 = sum of:
        0.037689745 = weight(_text_:und in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037689745 = score(doc=782,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
        0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07342099 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
        0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02402186 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
        0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10259437 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37939 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
        0.03344421 = product of:
          0.06688842 = sum of:
            0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06688842 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    In der Informationswissenschaft stehen Thesauri für kontrollierte und strukturierte Vokabulare, in denen Begriffe, verstanden als geistige Einheiten, durch Bezeichnungen der natürlichen Sprache repräsentiert werden. Jedem Begriff werden eine Vorzugsbenennung, ein sog. Deskriptor, der bei der Inhaltserschließung als Schlagwort vergeben wird, und weitere bedeutungsgleiche oder -ähnliche Bezeichnungen, sog. Nicht-Deskriptoren, als Zugangsvokabular bzw. alternative Sucheinstiege zugewiesen. Dieser Art werden der Variabilität und der Mehrdeutigkeit natürlicher Sprache Rechnung getragen. Darüber hinaus werden zwischen Begriffen bzw. ihren Bezeichnungen spezifische, reziproke Relationen kenntlich gemacht (s. Abschnitt 1), die die Bedeutungsbeziehungen bzw. das "semantische Gefüge" zwischen den Begriffen aufzeigen. Diese Kernprinzipien dieser Wissensorganisationsmethode dienen sowohl auf Seiten der Inhaltserschließenden als auch auf Seiten der in einem Informationssystem Recherchierenden in unterschiedlicher Weise der Benutzerführung und Suchunterstützung. Als Grundlage für semantisches Retrieval etwa sorgen sie bei automatischer Erweiterung der Suchanfrage um die hinterlegten Nicht-Deskriptoren für eine erfolgreiche Suche weitgehend unabhängig vom konkreten Suchterm.
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  6. Rodrigues Barbosa, E.; Godoy Viera, A.F.: Relações semânticas e interoperabilidade em tesauros representados em SKOS : uma revisao sistematica da literatura (2022) 0.21
    0.20739017 = product of:
      0.24886821 = sum of:
        0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015386774 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
        0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07342099 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
        0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02402186 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
        0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10259437 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37939 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
        0.03344421 = product of:
          0.06688842 = sum of:
            0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06688842 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  7. Chen, S.S.-J.: Methodological considerations for developing Art & Architecture Thesaurus in Chinese and its applications (2021) 0.20
    0.19605027 = product of:
      0.23526034 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061184157 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020018218 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08549531 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.055740345 = product of:
          0.11148069 = sum of:
            0.11148069 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11148069 = score(doc=579,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.5105618 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    A multilingual thesaurus' development needs the appropriate methodological considerations not only for linguistics, but also cultural heterogeneity, as demonstrated in this report on the multilingual project of the Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) in the Chinese language, which has been a collaboration between the Academia Sinica Center for Digital Culture and the Getty Research Institute for more than a decade. After a brief overview of the project, the paper will introduce a holistic methodology for considering how to enable Western art to be accessible to Chinese users and Chinese art accessible to Western users. The conceptual and structural issues will be discussed, especially the challenges of developing terminology in two different cultures. For instance, some terms shared by Western and Chinese cultures could be understood differently in each culture, which raises questions regarding their locations within the hierarchical structure of the AAT. Finally, the report will provide cases to demonstrate how the Chinese-Language AAT language supports online exhibitions, digital humanities and linking of digital art history content to the web of data.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Amirhosseini, M.; Avidan, G.: ¬A dialectic perspective on the evolution of thesauri and ontologies (2021) 0.19
    0.18982713 = product of:
      0.22779256 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
        0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061184157 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
        0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020018218 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
        0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08549531 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
        0.048272558 = product of:
          0.096545115 = sum of:
            0.096545115 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096545115 = score(doc=592,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.44215953 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this article is to identify the most important factors and features in the evolution of thesauri and ontologies through a dialectic model. This model relies on a dialectic process or idea which could be discovered via a dialectic method. This method has focused on identifying the logical relationship between a beginning proposition, or an idea called a thesis, a negation of that idea called the antithesis, and the result of the conflict between the two ideas, called a synthesis. During the creation of knowl­edge organization systems (KOSs), the identification of logical relations between different ideas has been made possible through the consideration and use of the most influential methods and tools such as dictionaries, Roget's Thesaurus, thesaurus, micro-, macro- and metathesauri, ontology, lower, middle and upper level ontologies. The analysis process has adapted a historical methodology, more specifically a dialectic method and documentary method as the reasoning process. This supports our arguments and synthesizes a method for the analysis of research results. Confirmed by the research results, the principle of unity has shown to be the most important factor in the development and evolution of the structure of knowl­edge organization systems and their types. There are various types of unity when considering the analysis of logical relations. These include the principle of unity of alphabetical order, unity of science, semantic unity, structural unity and conceptual unity. The results have clearly demonstrated a movement from plurality to unity in the assembling of the complex structure of knowl­edge organization systems to increase information and knowl­edge storage and retrieval performance.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Fagundes, P.B.; Freund, G.P.; Vital, L.P.; Monteiro de Barros, C.; Macedo, D.D.J.de: Taxonomias, ontologias e tesauros : possibilidades de contribuição para o processo de Engenharia de Requisitos (2020) 0.18
    0.17973499 = product of:
      0.215682 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
        0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061184157 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
        0.028310036 = weight(_text_:des in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028310036 = score(doc=5828,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.21635216 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
        0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08549531 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
        0.027870173 = product of:
          0.055740345 = sum of:
            0.055740345 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055740345 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.2552809 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Footnote
    Engl. Übers. des Titels: Taxonomies, ontologies and thesauri: possibilities of contribution to the process of Requirements Engineering.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus