Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Welhouse, Z.; Lee, J.H.; Bancroft, J.: "What am I fighting for?" : creating a controlled vocabulary for video game plot metadata (2015) 0.21
    0.20739017 = product of:
      0.24886821 = sum of:
        0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015386774 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
        0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07342099 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
        0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02402186 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
        0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10259437 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37939 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
        0.03344421 = product of:
          0.06688842 = sum of:
            0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06688842 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. White, M.: ¬The value of taxonomies, thesauri and metadata in enterprise search (2016) 0.18
    0.1824453 = product of:
      0.21893437 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 2964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=2964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2964)
        0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061184157 = score(doc=2964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 2964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2964)
        0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 2964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020018218 = score(doc=2964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 2964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2964)
        0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08549531 = score(doc=2964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 2964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2964)
        0.03941438 = product of:
          0.07882876 = sum of:
            0.07882876 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07882876 = score(doc=2964,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.36102176 = fieldWeight in 2964, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2964)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Biesenbender, S.; Tobias, R.: Rolle und Aufgaben von Bibliotheken im Umfeld des Kerndatensatz Forschung (2019) 0.03
    0.030521363 = product of:
      0.09156409 = sum of:
        0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043520372 = score(doc=5350,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
        0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04804372 = score(doc=5350,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel wird die Frage aufgegriffen, welche Auswirkungen der Kerndatensatz Forschung (KDSF) auf die aktuelle bibliothekarische Praxis haben kann. Dabei wird eine Bestandsaufnahme der (möglichen) Betätigungsfelder von Bibliotheken rund um den KDSF und die Einführung von Forschungsinformationssystemen (FIS) gezogen. Es sollen die Herausforderungen und das Potenzial des KDSF für die tägliche bibliothekarische Praxis im Rahmen einer modernen und integrierten Forschungsberichterstattung beleuchtet und Impulse für in der Zukunft erforderliche Anpassungsprozesse gegeben werden. Der Artikel stellt Aufbau und Konzept des KDSF vor. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf dem Kerndatensatz-Bereich "Publikationen". Bisherige Erfahrungen und Rückmeldungen an den "Helpdesk für die Einführung des Kerndatensatz Forschung" werden aus bibliothekarischer Sicht erörtert. Ein weiterer Teil zeigt beispielhafte Aktivitäten und Herangehensweisen, die sich für Bibliotheken im Umfeld der Einführung von FIS ergeben.
  4. Koch, G.; Koch, W.: Aggregation and management of metadata in the context of Europeana (2017) 0.03
    0.03013594 = product of:
      0.09040782 = sum of:
        0.050773766 = weight(_text_:und in 3910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050773766 = score(doc=3910,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3910, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3910)
        0.03963405 = weight(_text_:des in 3910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03963405 = score(doc=3910,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.302893 = fieldWeight in 3910, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3910)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Mit dem In-Beziehung-Setzen und Verlinken von Daten im Internet wird der Weg zur Umsetzung des semantischen Webs geebnet. Erst die semantische Verbindung von heterogenen Datenbeständen ermöglicht übergreifende Suchvorgänge und späteres "Machine Learning". Im Artikel werden die Aktivitäten der Europäischen Digitalen Bibliothek im Bereich des Metadatenmanagements und der semantischen Verlinkung von Daten skizziert. Dabei wird einerseits ein kurzer Überblick zu aktuellen Forschungsschwerpunkten und Umsetzungsstrategien gegeben, und darüber hinaus werden einzelne Projekte und maßgeschneiderte Serviceangebote für naturhistorische Daten, regionale Kultureinrichtungen und Audiosammlungen beschrieben.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2017) H.2, S.170-178
  5. Petritsch, B.: Metadata for research data in practice (2017) 0.02
    0.021893688 = product of:
      0.06568106 = sum of:
        0.025644625 = weight(_text_:und in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025644625 = score(doc=3913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
        0.040036436 = weight(_text_:des in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040036436 = score(doc=3913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Welche Daten über Daten brauchen wir? Die Beschreibung des Prozesses diese Frage für das institutionelle Datenrepositourium IST DataRep zu beantworten.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2017) H.2, S.200-207
  6. Preza, J.L.: Data science und analytics in libraries (2017) 0.01
    0.00764575 = product of:
      0.0458745 = sum of:
        0.0458745 = weight(_text_:und in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0458745 = score(doc=3916,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliotheken sind in einer priviligierten Situation: Sie verwalten riesige Mengen von Daten und Informationen. Data Science und Analytics-Methoden ermöglichen es Bibliotheken, den Inhalt, den sie verwalten, voll auszunutzen, um den Nutzern bessere Informationen, Suche und Empfehlungen zu bieten.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2017) H.2, S.244-248
  7. Carlson, S.; Seely, A.: Using OpenRefine's reconciliation to validate local authority headings (2017) 0.01
    0.0074320463 = product of:
      0.044592276 = sum of:
        0.044592276 = product of:
          0.08918455 = sum of:
            0.08918455 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08918455 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In 2015, the Cataloging and Metadata Services department of Rice University's Fondren Library developed a process to reconcile four years of authority headings against an internally developed thesaurus. With a goal of immediate cleanup as well as an ongoing maintenance procedure, staff developed a "hack" of OpenRefine's normal Reconciliation function that ultimately yielded 99.6% authority reconciliation and a stable process for monthly data verification.
  8. Rannharter, N.; Teetor, S.: Maintaining an image data base : a use case based on the Digital Research Archive for Byzantium (DIFAB) (2017) 0.01
    0.005734313 = product of:
      0.034405876 = sum of:
        0.034405876 = weight(_text_:und in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034405876 = score(doc=3914,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.328536 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Mit Metadaten versehene, digital archivierte Bilder sind aufgrund ihrer hohen Komplexität eine ständige Herausforderung für den Aufbau von Metadatenstrukturen und für das Beibehalten von adäquaten Metadatenstandards in Bilddatenbanken. Besonders bei Bildern über eine materielle Kultur zeichnet sich diese Komplexität in den diversen Ebenen ab. Zur Verdeutlichung dieser Problematik dient ein einzelnes Monument mit seiner fotographischen Dokumentation als geisteswissenschaftliches Anwendungsbeispiel aus dem Digitalen Forschungsarchiv Byzanz (DiFAB) der Universität Wien. Unter der grundsätzlichen Berücksichtigung der künftigen Anforderungen und der einfachen Navigation von Metadaten beinhaltet dieser Beitrag u. a. die Herausforderungen mit den diversen analogen und digitalen Formen der Dokumentation, der historischen Geographie, der kulturspezifischen Terminologie sowie mit der kunsthistorischen Bedeutung einer exakten und unscharfen Datierung für Forschungsarchive.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2017) H.2, S.208-224
  9. Bartczak, J.; Glendon, I.: Python, Google Sheets, and the Thesaurus for Graphic Materials for efficient metadata project workflows (2017) 0.01
    0.0055740355 = product of:
      0.03344421 = sum of:
        0.03344421 = product of:
          0.06688842 = sum of:
            0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06688842 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  10. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.01
    0.005334845 = product of:
      0.03200907 = sum of:
        0.03200907 = product of:
          0.06401814 = sum of:
            0.06401814 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06401814 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  11. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.01
    0.005334845 = product of:
      0.03200907 = sum of:
        0.03200907 = product of:
          0.06401814 = sum of:
            0.06401814 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06401814 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  12. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.01
    0.005334845 = product of:
      0.03200907 = sum of:
        0.03200907 = product of:
          0.06401814 = sum of:
            0.06401814 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06401814 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  13. Kopácsi, S.; Hudak, R.; Ganguly, R.: Implementation of a classification server to support metadata organization for long term preservation systems (2017) 0.01
    0.005182076 = product of:
      0.031092454 = sum of:
        0.031092454 = weight(_text_:und in 3915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031092454 = score(doc=3915,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 3915, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3915)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel beschreiben wir die Implementierung eines Klassifikationsservers für Metadatenorganisation in einem Langzeitarchivierungssystem für digitale Objekte. Nach einer kurzen Einführung in Klassifikationen und Wissensorganisationen stellen wir die Anforderungen an das zu implementierende System vor. Wir beschreiben sämtliche Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) Management Tools, die wir untersucht haben, darunter auch Skosmos, die Lösung, die wir für die Implementierung gewählt haben. Skosmos ist ein open source, webbasierter SKOS Browser, basierend auf dem Jena Fuseki SPARQL Server. Wir diskutieren einige entscheidende Schritte während der Installation der ausgewählten Tools und präsentieren sowohl die potentiell auftretenden Probleme mit den verwendeten Klassifikationen als auch mögliche Lösungen.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2017) H.2, S.225-243
  14. Niininen, S.; Nykyri, S.; Suominen, O.: ¬The future of metadata : open, linked, and multilingual - the YSO case (2017) 0.00
    0.004645029 = product of:
      0.027870173 = sum of:
        0.027870173 = product of:
          0.055740345 = sum of:
            0.055740345 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055740345 = score(doc=3707,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.2552809 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is threefold: to focus on the process of multilingual concept scheme construction and the challenges involved; to addresses concrete challenges faced in the construction process and especially those related to equivalence between terms and concepts; and to briefly outlines the translation strategies developed during the process of concept scheme construction. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on experience acquired during the establishment of the Finnish thesaurus and ontology service Finto as well as the trilingual General Finnish Ontology YSO, both of which are being maintained and further developed at the National Library of Finland. Findings Although uniform resource identifiers can be considered language-independent, they do not render concept schemes and their construction free of language-related challenges. The fundamental issue with all the challenges faced is how to maintain consistency and predictability when the nature of language requires each concept to be treated individually. The key to such challenges is to recognise the function of the vocabulary and the needs of its intended users. Social implications Open science increases the transparency of not only research products, but also metadata tools. Gaining a deeper understanding of the challenges involved in their construction is important for a great variety of users - e.g. indexers, vocabulary builders and information seekers. Today, multilingualism is an essential aspect at both the national and international information society level. Originality/value This paper draws on the practical challenges faced in concept scheme construction in a trilingual environment, with a focus on "concept scheme" as a translation and mapping unit.
  15. White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013) 0.00
    0.0042678756 = product of:
      0.025607252 = sum of:
        0.025607252 = product of:
          0.051214505 = sum of:
            0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051214505 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:09:22
  16. Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018) 0.00
    0.0042678756 = product of:
      0.025607252 = sum of:
        0.025607252 = product of:
          0.051214505 = sum of:
            0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051214505 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    18. 1.2019 19:13:22
  17. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.00
    0.0037343912 = product of:
      0.022406347 = sum of:
        0.022406347 = product of:
          0.044812694 = sum of:
            0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044812694 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.00
    0.0037343912 = product of:
      0.022406347 = sum of:
        0.022406347 = product of:
          0.044812694 = sum of:
            0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044812694 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  19. Baker, T.: Dublin Core Application Profiles : current approaches (2010) 0.00
    0.0032009068 = product of:
      0.01920544 = sum of:
        0.01920544 = product of:
          0.03841088 = sum of:
            0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03841088 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  20. DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011) 0.00
    0.0032009068 = product of:
      0.01920544 = sum of:
        0.01920544 = product of:
          0.03841088 = sum of:
            0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03841088 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Types

  • a 25
  • m 3
  • el 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…