Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.43355346 = product of:
  0.52026415 = sum of:
    0.053301353 = weight(_text_:und in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053301353 = score(doc=7110,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
    0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14684197 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
    0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04804372 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
    0.20518874 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20518874 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.75878 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
    0.06688842 = product of:
      0.13377684 = sum of:
        0.13377684 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13377684 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.61267424 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.8333333 = coord(5/6)

Footnote

Ausgehändigtes Papier während der Sitzung 'Methoden und Formate für sprachbezogene Begriffssysteme' anläßlich der 20. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation am 5.3.1995 in Freiburg

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.02225899 = product of:
  0.06677697 = sum of:
    0.038466934 = weight(_text_:und in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038466934 = score(doc=504,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
    0.028310036 = weight(_text_:des in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028310036 = score(doc=504,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.21635216 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Diese onomasiologische Arbeit untersucht sprachvergleichend lexikalische Benennungen mentaler Tätigkeiten (wie z.B. denken), Vorgänge (verstehen) und Zustände (wissen). Dabei stehen Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede der sprachlichen Erschließung dieser Bereiche im Blickpunkt. Bereits im deutschen Wortschatz zeigen sich verschiedene Motivationsverhältnisse: von relativ durchsichtigen Ausdrücken (begreifen, erwägen) über als komplex analysierbare, aber nicht eigentlich durchschaubare Ausdrücke (überlegen, verstehen) bis zu undurchsichtigen Simplizia (denken, wissen). Die Leitfrage lautet: Welche Bilder wiederholen sich durch verschiedene Sprachen und Kulturen? Gibt es bestimmte Bahnen, in denen sich die bezeichnungsmäßige Erschließung bewegt? Es zeigt sich, daß es sich um einen sehr heterogenen Bereich mit zahlreichen Bezeichnungsmustern handelt, von denen sich aber drei Muster - Bezeichnungen aus den Quellbereichen GREIFEN/NEHMEN, SEHEN und HÖREN - als stark verbreitet in verschiedenen Unterbereichen und in unterschiedlichen Sprachen herauskristallisieren.

BK

18.00 Einzelne Sprachen und Literaturen allgemein

Classification

18.00 Einzelne Sprachen und Literaturen allgemein

Imprint

Münster : Verl-Haus Monsenstein und Vannerdat

RSWK

Sprache des Denkens / Kontrastive Linguistik / Onomasiologie

Subject

Sprache des Denkens / Kontrastive Linguistik / Onomasiologie

0.0055740355 = product of:
  0.03344421 = sum of:
    0.03344421 = product of:
      0.06688842 = sum of:
        0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06688842 = score(doc=1201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Thesaural relations have long been used in information retrieval to enrich queries; they have sometimes been used to cluster documents as well. Sometimes the first query to an information retrieval system yields no results at all, or, what can be even more disconcerting, many thousands of hits. One solution is to rephrase the query, improving the choice of query terms by using related terms of different types. A collection of related terms is often called a thesaurus. This chapter describes the lexical-semantic relations that have been used in building thesauri and summarizes some of the effects of using these relational thesauri in information retrieval experiments