-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.16
0.16074404 = product of:
0.19289285 = sum of:
0.0089756185 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0089756185 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.042828906 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042828906 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.18721949 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.019817024 = weight(_text_:des in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019817024 = score(doc=3644,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.1514465 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.059846714 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059846714 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.22131084 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.06142459 = sum of:
0.039018244 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039018244 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.17869665 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.022406347 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022406347 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Funktion von semantischen Kategorien in Indexierungssprachen und bei der Indexierung (1986)
0.03
0.02643228 = product of:
0.079296835 = sum of:
0.037689745 = weight(_text_:und in 1554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037689745 = score(doc=1554,freq=12.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1554, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1554)
0.04160709 = weight(_text_:des in 1554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04160709 = score(doc=1554,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.31797147 = fieldWeight in 1554, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1554)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Wenn man unter "Indexierung" den zweistufigen Prozeß (a) des Erkennens der Essenz eines wiederauffindbar zu machenden Textes und (b) des Wiedergebens dieser Essenz in einer ausreichend wiedergabetreuen und genügend gut voraussagbaren Form versteht, dann kann die Qualität der Indexierung gesteigert werden, wenn sie unter besonderer Beachtung der Begriffe aus einer kleinen Zahl von besonders wichtigen semantischen Kategorien erfolgt. Bei der Gestaltung der Indexierungssprache müssen die Begriffe aus diesen Kategorien in der erforderlichen Detailliertheit in den Wortschatz aufgenommen werden, und Präkombinationen, die zu "multikategorialen" Begroffen führen, sind möglichst weitgehend zu vermeiden. Präkombinationen, die ausschließlich durch Einbeziehung von häufig vorkommenden ("ubiquitätren") monokategorialen Begriffen gebildet werden, können und sollen aus pragmatischen Gründen für den Wortschatz zugelassen werden. Das Konzept des "Relationenweges" erklärt, inwiefern solche Präkombinationen für den Wortschatz nicht schädlich sind
- Source
- Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
-
Krömmelbein, U.: Linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte der Schlagwortsyntax : Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, der RSWK und der Indexierungsverfahren Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS (1984)
0.02
0.022514079 = product of:
0.06754223 = sum of:
0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043520372 = score(doc=984,freq=16.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02402186 = score(doc=984,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Die deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt bietet seit einigen Jahren zentrale Dienste im Bereich der verbalen Sacherschließung an, Um deren Akzeptanz zu verbessern, will die Deutsche Bibliothek ab 1986 von der augenblicklichen gleichordnenden Indexierung zu einem syntaktischen Verfahren übergehen. Als Alternativen standen die RSWK und eine verkürzte Version des britischen Indexierungsverfahrens PRECIS zur Diskussion. Die Anforderungen einer Fachwissenschaft an die Schlagwort-Syntax einer adäquaten Dokumentationssprache werden exemplarisch entwickelt, die vier Alternativen - augenblickliche verbale Sacherschließunf der DB, RSWK, PRECIS (britische Version) und Kurz-PRECIS (DB-Version) - an ihnen gemessen. Die Kriterien basiern auf Grammatiktheorien der modernen Linguistik und gehen von einer Analogie zwischen Dokumentationssprachen und natürlicher Sprache aus.
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 8(1984), S.159-202
-
Dietze, J.: Informationsrecherchesprache und deren Lexik : Bemerkungen zur Terminologiediskussion (1980)
0.02
0.016276997 = product of:
0.048830986 = sum of:
0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015386774 = score(doc=32,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
0.03344421 = product of:
0.06688842 = sum of:
0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06688842 = score(doc=32,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Information research consists of the comparison of 2 sources of information - that of formal description and content analysis and that based on the needs of the user. Information research filters identical elements from the sources by means of document and research cross-sections. Establishing such cross-sections for scientific documents and research questions is made possible by classification. Through the definition of the terms 'class' and 'classification' it becomes clear that the terms 'hierarchic classification' and 'classification' cannot be used synonymously. The basic types of information research languages are both hierarchic and non-hierarchic arising from the structure of lexicology and the paradigmatic relations of the lexicological units. The names for the lexicological units ('descriptor' and 'subject haedings') are synonymous, but it is necessary to differentiate between the terms 'descriptor language' and 'information research thesaurus'. The principles of precoordination and post-coordination as applied to word formation are unsuitable for the typification of information research languages
-
Rolling, L.: ¬The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies (1985)
0.01
0.012770238 = product of:
0.038310714 = sum of:
0.016014574 = weight(_text_:des in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016014574 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
0.022296138 = product of:
0.044592276 = sum of:
0.044592276 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044592276 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.20422474 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The use of diagrams to express relationships in classification is not new. Many classificationists have used this approach, but usually in a minor display to make a point or for part of a difficult relational situation. Ranganathan, for example, used diagrams for some of his more elusive concepts. The thesaurus in particular and subject headings in general, with direct and indirect crossreferences or equivalents, need many more diagrams than normally are included to make relationships and even semantics clear. A picture very often is worth a thousand words. Rolling has used directed graphs (arrowgraphs) to join terms as a practical method for rendering relationships between indexing terms lucid. He has succeeded very weIl in this endeavor. Four diagrams in this selection are all that one needs to explain how to employ the system; from initial listing to completed arrowgraph. The samples of his work include illustration of off-page connectors between arrowgraphs. The great advantage to using diagrams like this is that they present relations between individual terms in a format that is easy to comprehend. But of even greater value is the fact that one can use his arrowgraphs as schematics for making three-dimensional wire-and-ball models, in which the relationships may be seen even more clearly. In fact, errors or gaps in relations are much easier to find with this methodology. One also can get across the notion of the threedimensionality of classification systems with such models. Pettee's "hand reaching up and over" (q.v.) is not a figment of the imagination. While the actual hand is a wire or stick, the concept visualized is helpful in illuminating the three-dimensional figure that is latent in all systems that have cross-references or "broader," "narrower," or, especially, "related" terms. Classification schedules, being hemmed in by the dimensions of the printed page, also benefit from such physical illustrations. Rolling, an engineer by conviction, was the developer of information systems for the Cobalt Institute, the European Atomic Energy Community, and European Coal and Steel Community. He also developed and promoted computer-aided translation at the Commission of the European Communities in Luxembourg. One of his objectives has always been to increase the efficiency of mono- and multilingual thesauri for use in multinational information systems.
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
-
Neet, H.: Assoziationsrelationen in Dokumentationslexika für die verbale Sacherschließung (1984)
0.01
0.009046573 = product of:
0.05427944 = sum of:
0.05427944 = weight(_text_:und in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05427944 = score(doc=1254,freq=14.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Thesauri und Dokumentationslexika können als Varianten von onomasiologischen Wörterbüchern aufgefaßt werden, deren besonderes Interesse für die Linguistik darin besteht, daß Äquivalenz-, Hierarchie- und Assoziationsrelationen angegegeben werden. Regelwerke und Beiträge werden besprochen, die sich mit der Ausweisung von "verwandten" Begriffen in der bibliothekarischen und dokumentarischen Praxis befassen. Belege zu Musterbeispielen von "siehe auch"- und "related term"-Verweisungen werden anhand von drei deutschsprachigen Schlagwortregistern aufgelistet. Die Assoziationsrelationen werden in paradigmatische und syntagmatische Beziehungen eingeteilt. Auch Gruppierungen nach Begriffsfeldern und Assoziationsfeldern sind möglich. Untersuchungen von Assoziationsrelationen im Sachbereich "Buchwesen" bestätigen die Vermutung, daß die Mehrzahl der Verweisungen das gemeinsame Vorkommen bestimmter Begriffe in typischen Kontexten der außersprachlichen Wirklichkeit betrifft.
-
Körner, H.G.: Syntax und Gewichtung in Informationssprachen : Ein Fortschrittsbericht über präzisere Indexierung und Computer-Suche (1985)
0.01
0.008462295 = product of:
0.050773766 = sum of:
0.050773766 = weight(_text_:und in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050773766 = score(doc=281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Krömmelbein, U.: linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, RSWK, Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS : Schlagwort-Syntax (1983)
0.01
0.007402966 = product of:
0.044417795 = sum of:
0.044417795 = weight(_text_:und in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044417795 = score(doc=2566,freq=6.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Examensarbeit Höherer Dienst an der FHBD in Köln. - Auch veröffentlicht in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 8(1984) S.159-203
-
Krömmelbein, U.: Natürliche Sprache und Strukturprinzipien von Dokumentationssprachen : eine vergleichende Analyse (1981)
0.01
0.006838567 = product of:
0.0410314 = sum of:
0.0410314 = weight(_text_:und in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0410314 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Dietze, J.: ¬Die semantische Struktur der Thesauruslexik (1988)
0.01
0.0059837457 = product of:
0.035902474 = sum of:
0.035902474 = weight(_text_:und in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035902474 = score(doc=6051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg: Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe. 37(1988) H.6, S.120-123
-
Kuhlen, R.: Linguistische Grundlagen (1980)
0.01
0.0059837457 = product of:
0.035902474 = sum of:
0.035902474 = weight(_text_:und in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035902474 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: eine Einführung. 2. Aufl
-
DIN 31623: Indexierung zur inhaltlichen Erschließung von Dokumenten : T.1: Begriffe, Grundlagen; T.2: Gleichordnende Indexierung mit Deskriptoren; T.3: Syntaktische Indexierung mit Deskriptoren (1988)
0.01
0.0051289247 = product of:
0.030773548 = sum of:
0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773548 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Jansen, R.: Intentionen der Indexierungsnorm 31623 und Überlegungen zum Verhältnis gleichordnende/syntaktische Indexierung
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬Der Mangel an Grammatik bei Indexsprachen und seine Folgen (1987)
0.01
0.0051289247 = product of:
0.030773548 = sum of:
0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773548 = score(doc=257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The analytico-synthetic foundation for large indexing & information retrieval systems : dedicated to Prof. Dr. Werner Schultheis, the vigorous initiator of modern chem. documentation in Germany on the occasion of his 85th birthday (1983)
0.00
0.0048355972 = product of:
0.029013582 = sum of:
0.029013582 = weight(_text_:und in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029013582 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- RSWK
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
- Subject
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
-
Fugmann, R.: Theoretische Grundlagen der Indexierungspraxis (1985)
0.00
0.0042741043 = product of:
0.025644625 = sum of:
0.025644625 = weight(_text_:und in 280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025644625 = score(doc=280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=280)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Enthält in gut verständlicher Form u.a. eine Darstellung der Konzepte 'Vorhersagbarkeit' und 'Wiedergabetreue' von Elementen einer Indexierungssprache
-
Winograd, T.: Software für Sprachverarbeitung (1984)
0.00
0.0042741043 = product of:
0.025644625 = sum of:
0.025644625 = weight(_text_:und in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025644625 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Der Computer kann mit sprachlichen Zeichen sicher und schnell umgehen. Dies zeigen Programme zur Textverarbeitung. Versuche allerdings, ihn auch mit Bedeutungen operieren zu lassen, sind gescheitert. Wird der Rechner das größte Problem der Sprachverarbeitung - die Mehrdeutigkeit natürlicher Sprachen - jemals bewältigen?
-
Coates, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings (1985)
0.00
0.0026690958 = product of:
0.016014574 = sum of:
0.016014574 = weight(_text_:des in 3634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016014574 = score(doc=3634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 3634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3634)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1985)
0.00
0.0026690958 = product of:
0.016014574 = sum of:
0.016014574 = weight(_text_:des in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016014574 = score(doc=3641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels (1985)
0.00
0.0023354588 = product of:
0.014012752 = sum of:
0.014012752 = weight(_text_:des in 3639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014012752 = score(doc=3639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.10708885 = fieldWeight in 3639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3639)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
-
Farradane, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification (1985)
0.00
0.0020018218 = product of:
0.01201093 = sum of:
0.01201093 = weight(_text_:des in 3642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01201093 = score(doc=3642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.091790445 = fieldWeight in 3642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3642)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
