Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.32 
    0.32300976 = product of:
  0.38761172 = sum of:
    0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015386774 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
    0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07342099 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
    0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02402186 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
    0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10259437 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.37939 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
    0.17218772 = sum of:
      0.13377684 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13377684 = score(doc=1181,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.61267424 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03841088 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
  0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschliessung (2005) 0.05 
    0.054989114 = product of:
  0.10997823 = sum of:
    0.03912381 = weight(_text_:und in 2183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03912381 = score(doc=2183,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.3735868 = fieldWeight in 2183, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2183)
    0.042828906 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042828906 = score(doc=2183,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.18721949 = fieldWeight in 2183, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2183)
    0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 2183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028025504 = score(doc=2183,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 2183, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2183)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Content
    "Unsere Sitzung fand diesmal am 13. 9. 2005 in Bozen im Rahmen der ODOK statt. Es waren daher auch viele interessierte Südtiroler und italienische Sacherschließungskollegen/-innen zu Gast. Eine der beiden Konferenzsprachen war Englisch, und so konnten wir Mehrsprachigkeit, das Thema unserer Sitzung und der beiden Gastvorträge, gleich selbst praktizieren. Patrice LANDRY, der Leiter der Sacherschließung an derSLB in Bern, der seit kurzem den Vorsitz der IFLA-Sektion "Classification and Indexing" und der Arbeitsgruppe "Guidelines for subject access for national bibliographic agencies" übernommen hatte, referierte über den jüngsten Stand des Projekts MACS (Multilingual Access to Subjects) und ließ uns am Nachmittag in seinem Workshop hinter die Kulissen der bereits mit echten Titeldaten operierenden Suchoberfläche blicken. Er zeigte die verschiedenen Recherche- und Editier-Funktionen im Management Linking System und brachte Beispiele für die kooperative Bearbeitung an einigen Datensätzen der bisher bereits miteinander verzahnten Normdateien SWD, LCSH und RAMEAU. Schließlich eröffnete er Ausblicke auf die künftige Einbindung weiterer Sprachen, etwa des Italienischen durch den Soggetario und auf die Anreicherung der Daten, etwa mit DDC-Notationen durch die Nähe zum DDB-Projekt "CrissCross". Federica PARADISI, die in der Sacherschließungsabteilung der BNC in Florenz sowohl für die italienische Übersetzung der DDC und deren Anwendung in ganz Italien als auch für die Überarbeitung des seit 1956 existierenden italienischen Wortschatzes für die verbale Erschließung und für dessen Aufbereitung zu einer modernen, bald auch elektronischen Normdatei zuständig ist und an der Erstellung der italienischen Nationalbibliografie mitwirkt, hat zuletzt gemeinsam mit Anna Lucarelli den Prototyp des "Nuovo Soggetario" erarbeitet und stellte dieses umfangreiche Projekt vor. Der von ihr skizzierte Zeitplan gibt Anlass zur Hoffnung, dass MACS für die Auffindung beschlagworteter Literatur in Bibliothekskatalogen schon in einem Jahr um einen sprachlichen Zugang reicher sein könnte. Beide Gastreferenten/-innen standen dem Auditorium im Anschluss an die Präsentationen für Fragen zur Verfügung, und die neuen fachlichen Kontakte vertieften sich in den Pausengesprächen noch mehr. Vor der Führung durch die Dewey-Ausstellung im Lichthof der UB Bozen demonstrierte Margit SANDNER zum Abschluss dieses multilingualen Sacherschließungsnachmittags mit einigen Beispielen in deutscherSprache die Suchfunktionen in den beiden Webversionen von DDC Deutsch MelvilSearch (für OPACs) und MelvilClass (für das Klassifizieren) und kündigte an, dass ab Oktober bis Jahresende kostenlose Testaccounts vergeben werden. Wer daran interessiert ist, diese deutschsprachigen Webtools bereits auszuprobieren, wendet sich am besten direkt an Herrn Dr. Lars Svensson in Der Deutschen Bibliothek in Frankfurt: svensson@dbf.ddb.de. Die ab Jänner 2006 gültigen Lizenzbedingungen für "Melvil" entnehmen Sie bitte: http//www.ddc-deutsch.de/licence-melvil.html Noch zwei aktuelle Hinweise: - Informationstag der Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung (DDB) über aktuelle Tendenzen in Sachen Regelwerke f. Formal- und Sacherschließung, Formate, Normdateien und Datentausch am 15. November in Wien. - Aufsatz über die Zukunft der SWD von Esther Scheven (BD 2005, H. 6, S. 748-773), in dem u. a. auch auf unsere seinerzeitige KofSE-Studie: Schlagwort "Benutzerforschung" ... (VÖB-Mitt. 1997, H. 3-4, S. 28-49) rekurriert wird."
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.3, S.83-84
  3. Austin, D.: PRECIS: Introduction (1987) 0.03 
    0.026272424 = product of:
  0.07881727 = sum of:
    0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030773548 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
    0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04804372 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Zusammenfassende kompakte Darstellung des Systems PRECIS, seiner Geschichte, Eigenschaften und Möglichkeiten bis hin zum Online-Retrieval. - Als Einführung zu empfehlen
  4. Viti, E.: My first ten years : nuovo soggettario growing, development and integration with other knowledge organization systems (2017) 0.02 
    0.023914961 = product of:
  0.14348976 = sum of:
    0.14348976 = sum of:
      0.11148069 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11148069 = score(doc=4143,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.5105618 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
      0.03200907 = weight(_text_:22 in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200907 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The Nuovo Soggettario is a subject indexing system edited by the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze. It was presented to librarians from across Italy on 8 February 2007 in Florence as a new edition of the Soggettario (1956), and it has become the official Italian subject indexing tool. This system is made up of two individual and interactive components: the general thesaurus, accessible on the web since 2007 and the rules of a conventional syntax for the construction of subject strings. The Nuovo soggettario thesaurus has grown significantly in terms of terminology and connections with other knowledge organization tools (e.g., encyclopedias, dictionaries, resources of archives and museums, and other information data sets), offering the users the possibility to browse through documents, books, objects, photographs, etc. The conversion of the Nuovo soggettario thesaurus into formats suitable for the semantic web and linked data world improves its function as an interlinking hub for direct searching and for organizing content by different professional communities. Thanks to structured data and the SKOS format, the Nuovo soggettario thesaurus is published on the Data Hub platform, thus giving broad visibility to the BNCF and its precious patrimony.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  5. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.02 
    0.021581864 = product of:
  0.06474559 = sum of:
    0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030773548 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
    0.03397204 = weight(_text_:des in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03397204 = score(doc=1643,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.25962257 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.279-294
  6. Dykstra, M.: LC subject headings disguised as a thesaurus (1988) 0.01 
    0.013006082 = product of:
  0.07803649 = sum of:
    0.07803649 = product of:
      0.15607297 = sum of:
        0.15607297 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15607297 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.7147866 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  7. Wiesenmüller, H.: LCSH goes RSWK? : Überlegungen zur Diskussion um die "Library of Congress subject headings" (2009) 0.01 
    0.012717235 = product of:
  0.038151704 = sum of:
    0.018133488 = weight(_text_:und in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018133488 = score(doc=3039,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
    0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020018218 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 1898 begann die Library of Congress mit der Arbeit an einem Schlagwortkatalog - die Geburtsstunde der 'Library of Congress subject headings' (LCSH). Heute stellen die LCSH das zentrale Werkzeug zur verbalen inhaltlichen Erschließung in der gesamten angloamerikanischen Welt dar. Auch die Kritik an diesem Erschließungssystem hat eine lange Geschichte: Sie lässt sich bis in die Mitte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts zurückverfolgen und betraf im Lauf der Zeit recht unterschiedliche Aspekte. Neu an der Debatte der letzten Jahre ist, dass die Struktur der LCSH ganz grundsätzlich in Frage gestellt wird. Eine Projektgruppe der Bibliothek der University of California etwa urteilte 2005: "LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control." In einer für die Library of Congress erstellten Expertise mit dem Titel 'On the record' von 2008 heißt es: "LCSH suffers (...) from a structure that is cumbersome from both administrative and automation points of view". Es wird empfohlen, die LCSH in ein flexibleres Werkzeug zu verwandeln: "Transform LCSH into a tool that provides a more flexible means to create and modify subject authority data." Dies beinhaltet zum einen ein "de-coupling of subject strings", also eine 'Entkoppelung' der fest zusammengefügten (präkombinierten) Eintragungen, und zum anderen die Möglichkeit, das LCSH-Vokabular für "faceted browsing and discovery" nutzbar zu machen . Besonders drastische Worte wurden 2006 im sogenannten 'Calhoun Report' gefunden - einem Papier, das mit seinen radikalen Thesen in der amerikanischen Bibliothekswelt viel Aufsehen erregte: Man müsse die Library of Congress dazu bringen, die LCSH zu 'zerschlagen' ("urge LC to dismantle LCSH") - ja, sie gar zu 'eliminieren' ("eliminate LCSH").
  8. Paradisi, F.: Analisi a faccette e categorie semantiche per i termini giuridici nel Thesaurus del Nuovo soggettario (2008) 0.01 
    0.009654513 = product of:
  0.057927076 = sum of:
    0.057927076 = product of:
      0.11585415 = sum of:
        0.11585415 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11585415 = score(doc=2180,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5305915 = fieldWeight in 2180, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Nuovo soggettario, edited by the National Central Library of Florence and published in 2007, is a subject indexing system renewing the existing »Soggettario per i cataloghi delle biblioteche italiane« (1956). The new language has been created according to rules and standards internationally recognized and is made up of various components, of which the multidisciplinary Thesaurus is the central one. This paper describes the facet analysis method adopted in developing the Thesaurus, (the terms of which derive mainly from the daily indexing work of the Italian National Bibliography) and how this has been applied to the semantic structure for legal terms. Details are also given concerning problems deriving from the overlapping of facets and how these are being resolved.
  9. Jouguelet, S.: Indexation: mode d'emploi international (1993) 0.01 
    0.008007287 = product of:
  0.04804372 = sum of:
    0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 7526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04804372 = score(doc=7526,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 7526, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7526)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 38(1993) no.6, S.76-79
  10. Lucarelli, A.: Work in progress on the new Soggettario (2005) 0.01 
    0.007964566 = product of:
  0.047787394 = sum of:
    0.047787394 = product of:
      0.09557479 = sum of:
        0.09557479 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09557479 = score(doc=5042,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.4377156 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Work on a prototype of the new Soggettario (the main Italian subject heading list) has begun in October 2004 at the Central National Library of Florence (BNCF). BNCF is involving in the renewal of the most used subject indexing tool of Italian libraries. The project had already produced a Feasibility Study, representing a reference for the works which have started recently. An Italian abstract of the Feasibility Study, and more documentation, can be found in the BCNF website at the Web address <http://www bncf.firenze.sbn.it/progetti/>. Together with the project team and the BNCF staff, some young external consultants are working, who are focusing on the terminological component of the system, namely the prototype of the Thesaurus. At the same time, documents are produced which define procedures, establish criteria, and give guidelines. The list of items by which the prototype started consists of: - the terms included in the updates provided by the Italian National Bibliography (BNI) during the period 1986-1998 (already published in the form of lists); - the items introduced from 1999 to 2005 - other items introduced in the past years but never recorded; - some terms from the Soggettario (1956) or from BNI updates (1956-19S5), being especially outdated and needing revision. In building the semantic networks and the hierarchies, and in making the terminological control, of course, more terms have to be included, which come from the Soggettario, the BNI and other authoritative sources both catalographic (various indexing tools) and lexicographic (general and special directories). DDC numbers are also related to the terms in the Thesaurus. The prototype, to be completed in April 2006, will include a sample of terms for each disciplinary area. About 5000 terms will have a complete structure, but 6000 more will be included in the Thesaurus in order to fill the semantic networks, and marked with a different working status. For the prototype the AgroVoc software is used, which has been provided by FAO and adapted by the BNCF computing staff in order to match the specific requirements of the project. Thanks to the potential of this software, we intend to test in future on the multilingual side of terminology. Such work is likely to begin by testing links to the corresponding forms used by the Library of Congress. We are currently beginning to focus on this, and we wish that external parties be involved which are concerned with multilingual terminology in more or less specialistic contexts. We will follow the road of conventions with Italian universities, which could cooperate to this development through their students and graded students. We are also looking at the developments in the work of the British BSI working group on standards for thesauri convened by Stella Dextre Clarke.
    Testing on the syntactic component of the language is in progress, carried out by a team working on the basis of some terms of the Thesaurus which have been identified for possessing some special features. This will maybe lead to some changes and simplifications in the original structures coming from the GRIS model <http://wwwaib.it/aib/commiss/gris/ guida.htm> and the Feasibility Study. Within June 2006, two basic documents will be published: - a paper volume containing the Rules, concerning both terminology and syntax, explanations of the Thesaurus, criteria, choices made about the categories and the width of the semantic network, etc.; - a CD containing the Thesaurus. One side of great interest will be the c-learning process of the indexing language of the new Soggettario. This has to be undertaken only after the prototype stage is done. At that time, once the text of the Rules will have been published, it will be possible for the system to spread, to be learned, and to be tested by various indexers and partners.
  11. Sicker, W.: Zur Unterscheidung zwischen Such- und Informationswert bei der Schlagwortgebung (1970) 0.01 
    0.006838567 = product of:
  0.0410314 = sum of:
    0.0410314 = weight(_text_:und in 2023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0410314 = score(doc=2023,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2023, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2023)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  12. Cheti, A.: ¬Il GRIS dall'elaborazione alla sperimentazione (1997) 0.01 
    0.0066727395 = product of:
  0.040036436 = sum of:
    0.040036436 = weight(_text_:des in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040036436 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: GRIS: from elaboration to experimentation
  13. Buizza, P.; Guerrini, M.: ¬Un modello concettuale per il nuovo Soggettario : l'indicizzazione per soggetto alla luce di FRBR (2001) 0.01 
    0.0066727395 = product of:
  0.040036436 = sum of:
    0.040036436 = weight(_text_:des in 3738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040036436 = score(doc=3738,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 3738, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3738)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: A conceptual model for the new BNCF subject headings: subject indexing in the light of FRBR
  14. Bloomfield, M.: ¬A look at subject headings : a plea for standardization (1993) 0.01 
    0.006503041 = product of:
  0.039018244 = sum of:
    0.039018244 = product of:
      0.07803649 = sum of:
        0.07803649 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07803649 = score(doc=2475,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In the preparation of a book on how to do a literature search, many inconsistencies were found in the assignment of subject terms. The Library of Congress Subject Headings is cited for not bringing computer languages into a consistent pattern. BASIC and FORTRAN are treated differently in their see also references and are without references to the words "computers" or "computer." Also index terms for the literature search on the "search for extraterrestrial life" showed inconsistent patterns in indexing. Catalogers and indexers need to review the work they are currently publishing and try to decide how to bring some standardization to the construction of subject terms. There is a need to provide a single thesaurus for all English index terms.
  15. Leth, P.; Berg, I.: Subject indexing in Sweden (2008) 0.01 
    0.0055740355 = product of:
  0.03344421 = sum of:
    0.03344421 = product of:
      0.06688842 = sum of:
        0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06688842 = score(doc=2182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 2182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Object
    Thesaurus for Geographic Materials
  16. Cheti, A.: L'indicizzazione per soggetto negli anni Novanta (1996) 0.01 
    0.0053381915 = product of:
  0.03202915 = sum of:
    0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03202915 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Subject headings in the 90s
  17. Tartaglia, S.: ¬La sintassi delle stringhe di soggetto : metodo e principi (1997) 0.01 
    0.0053381915 = product of:
  0.03202915 = sum of:
    0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03202915 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The syntax of subject strings: methods and principles
  18. Danesi, D.: Chi ha paura dell'uomo nero? : Maltese e il controllo terminologico (1997) 0.01 
    0.0053381915 = product of:
  0.03202915 = sum of:
    0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03202915 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Who fears the black man?: Maltese and teminological control
  19. Stumpf, G.: RSWK - wirklich ein Relikt? (1995) 0.01 
    0.0051289247 = product of:
  0.030773548 = sum of:
    0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030773548 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Soll eine Erwiderung sein auf: Lepsky, K.: RSWK - und was noch in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519.
  20. Maltese, D.: ¬Sul controllo dei termini di indicizzazione per soggetti : contributo al testo definitivo della Guida GRIS (1997) 0.00 
    0.0046709175 = product of:
  0.028025504 = sum of:
    0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028025504 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The control of terms in subject headings: a contribution to the definitive text of the GRIS Guide

Authors

Years

Languages

Themes