Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.38
    0.37753093 = product of:
      0.45303714 = sum of:
        0.04397137 = weight(_text_:und in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04397137 = score(doc=4792,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
        0.08565781 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08565781 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
        0.0485416 = weight(_text_:des in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0485416 = score(doc=4792,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3709667 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
        0.11969343 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11969343 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.44262168 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
        0.15517296 = sum of:
          0.110360265 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.110360265 = score(doc=4792,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04725067 = queryNorm
              0.50543046 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044812694 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04725067 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.31
    0.30597472 = product of:
      0.36716968 = sum of:
        0.04397137 = weight(_text_:und in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04397137 = score(doc=2461,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
        0.08565781 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08565781 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
        0.06266693 = weight(_text_:des in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06266693 = score(doc=2461,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.4789159 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
        0.11969343 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11969343 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.44262168 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
        0.055180132 = product of:
          0.110360265 = sum of:
            0.110360265 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110360265 = score(doc=2461,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.50543046 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.27
    0.26712292 = product of:
      0.32054752 = sum of:
        0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043520372 = score(doc=1837,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
        0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07342099 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
        0.05371451 = weight(_text_:des in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05371451 = score(doc=1837,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41049933 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
        0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10259437 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37939 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
        0.047297254 = product of:
          0.09459451 = sum of:
            0.09459451 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09459451 = score(doc=1837,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.4332261 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Institut für Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd. 54
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008) 0.26
    0.2585687 = product of:
      0.31028247 = sum of:
        0.021760186 = weight(_text_:und in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021760186 = score(doc=5448,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
        0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07342099 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
        0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02402186 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
        0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10259437 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37939 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
        0.08848506 = product of:
          0.17697012 = sum of:
            0.17697012 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17697012 = score(doc=5448,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.81049186 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper the possibility to develop a richer relational structure for thesauri is explored and described. The development of a new environmental thesaurus - EARTh (Environmental Applications Reference Thesaurus) - is serving as a case study for exploring the refinement of thesaurus relational structure by specialising standard relationships into different subtypes. Together with benefits and opportunities, implications and possible challenges that an expanded set of thesaurus relations may cause are evaluated.
    Object
    EARTh-Thesaurus
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008) 0.01
    0.008045427 = product of:
      0.048272558 = sum of:
        0.048272558 = product of:
          0.096545115 = sum of:
            0.096545115 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096545115 = score(doc=2497,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.44215953 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
  6. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.005334845 = product of:
      0.03200907 = sum of:
        0.03200907 = product of:
          0.06401814 = sum of:
            0.06401814 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06401814 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  7. Peters, I.; Weller. K.: Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems (2008) 0.00
    0.0029918728 = product of:
      0.017951237 = sum of:
        0.017951237 = weight(_text_:und in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017951237 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.2, S.100-107
  8. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.00
    0.0026674224 = product of:
      0.016004534 = sum of:
        0.016004534 = product of:
          0.03200907 = sum of:
            0.03200907 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03200907 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  9. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Formalizing terminology-based knowledge for an ontology independently of a particular language (2008) 0.00
    0.0025644624 = product of:
      0.015386774 = sum of:
        0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015386774 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch