Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008) 0.01
    0.008045427 = product of:
      0.048272558 = sum of:
        0.048272558 = product of:
          0.096545115 = sum of:
            0.096545115 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096545115 = score(doc=2497,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.44215953 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
  2. Giri, K.; Gokhale, P.: Developing a banking service ontology using Protégé, an open source software (2015) 0.00
    0.0021370521 = product of:
      0.012822312 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=2793,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft zu Leben und Werk von S.R. Ranganathan.
  3. Ghosh, S.; Panigrahi, P.: Use of Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic approach in developing a domain ontology in library and information science (2015) 0.00
    0.0021370521 = product of:
      0.012822312 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft zu Leben und Werk von S.R. Ranganathan.