Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Skorsky, M.: Graphische Darstellung eines Thesaurus (1997) 0.46
    0.4566419 = product of:
      0.5479703 = sum of:
        0.053301353 = weight(_text_:und in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053301353 = score(doc=1051,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
        0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14684197 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
        0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04804372 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
        0.20518874 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20518874 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.75878 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
        0.09459451 = product of:
          0.18918902 = sum of:
            0.18918902 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18918902 = score(doc=1051,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.8664522 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation: Qualität und Qualifikation. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1997, Universität Regensburg, 24.-26.9.1997. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld u. G.J. Mantwill
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994) 0.28
    0.2765202 = product of:
      0.33182424 = sum of:
        0.0205157 = weight(_text_:und in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0205157 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
        0.097894646 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097894646 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
        0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03202915 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
        0.1367925 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1367925 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.50585335 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
        0.044592276 = product of:
          0.08918455 = sum of:
            0.08918455 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08918455 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Datensysteme als Werkzeuge der Wissenskommunikation (1992) 0.03
    0.026272424 = product of:
      0.07881727 = sum of:
        0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 8826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030773548 = score(doc=8826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 8826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8826)
        0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 8826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04804372 = score(doc=8826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 8826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8826)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
  4. Andelfinger, U.: Inhaltliche Erschließung des Bereichs 'Sozialorientierte Gestaltung von Informationstechnik' : Ein begriffsanalytischer Ansatz (2000) 0.03
    0.026272424 = product of:
      0.07881727 = sum of:
        0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 4201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030773548 = score(doc=4201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4201)
        0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 4201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04804372 = score(doc=4201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 4201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4201)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler. Hrsg.: G. Stumme u. R. Wille
  5. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung in der Wirtschaft (2002) 0.02
    0.023998959 = product of:
      0.071996875 = sum of:
        0.04397137 = weight(_text_:und in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04397137 = score(doc=547,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
        0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028025504 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung ist einem pragmatischen Wissensverständnis verpflichtet, nach dem menschliches Wissen in einem offenen Prozess menschlichen Denkens, Argumentierens und Kommunizierens entsteht und weiterlebt. Sie gründet sich auf eine mathematische Begriffstheorie, die auf das wechselseitige Zusammenwirken von Formalem und Inhaltlichem ausgerichtet ist. Wie diese theoretische Konzeption in der wirtschaftlichen Praxis zur Wirkung kommt wird erläutert anhand der Kernprozesse des organisationalen Wissensmanagements, d.h. nach G. Probst et al. anhand von Wissensidentifikation, Wissenserwerb, Wissensentwicklung, Wissens(ver)teilung, Wissensnutzung und Wissensbewahrung; jeweils an einem Beispiel wird der Einsatz spezifischer Methoden der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung demonstriert. Abschließend wird auf den prozesshaften Wirkungszusammenhang von Wissenszielen und Wissensbewertungen mit den Kernprozessen aus Sicht der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung eingegangen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.3, S.149-160
  6. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.020474864 = product of:
      0.12284918 = sum of:
        0.12284918 = sum of:
          0.07803649 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07803649 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04725067 = queryNorm
              0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044812694 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04725067 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  7. Kipke, U.; Wille, R.: Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung (1986) 0.02
    0.020347577 = product of:
      0.06104273 = sum of:
        0.029013582 = weight(_text_:und in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029013582 = score(doc=3039,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
        0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03202915 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgeführt wird, wie Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung genutzt werden können. Im Gegensatz zur Baumabfrage gestattet die beschriebene Methode dem Benutzer ein Höchstmaß an Freiheit und Transparenz. Demonstriert wird die Methode an der Bestimmung des Symmetrieprinzips von Flächenmustern
    Source
    Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld. Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P. Degens, H.-J. Hermes, O. Opitz
  8. Kollewe, W.: Instrumente der Literaturverwaltung : Inhaltliche analyse von Datenbeständen durch 'Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung' (1996) 0.02
    0.01751495 = product of:
      0.052544847 = sum of:
        0.0205157 = weight(_text_:und in 4376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0205157 = score(doc=4376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4376)
        0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 4376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03202915 = score(doc=4376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 4376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4376)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ein grundsätzliches Problem der Literaturverwaltung besteht darin, daß viele Nutzer der Retrievalsysteme gar nicht genau sagen können, was sie suchen. Erst im Prozeß des erkundenden Suchens lernen sie genauer zu präzisieren, was sie finden wollen. Dieser Lernprozeß wird durch einzelne Suchwörter (Suchwortketten) nur unzureichend unterstützt, weshalb der benutzer häufig unzufrieden mit dem Ergebnis eines solchen Suchprozesses ist. Notwendig sind reichhaltigere Begriffsnetze, die thematisch geordnete Zusammenhänge darstellen und sich flexibel verfeinern, vergröbern oder verändern lassen, um in geeignetem Umfang die wünschenswerte Orientierung liefern zu können. Das Computerprogramm TOSCANA könnte hier weiterhelfen
  9. Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval (2000) 0.01
    0.011263598 = product of:
      0.06758159 = sum of:
        0.06758159 = product of:
          0.13516317 = sum of:
            0.13516317 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13516317 = score(doc=6055,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.6190234 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A lattice-based model for information retrieval was suggested in the 1960's but has been seen as a theoretical possibility hard to practically apply ever since. This paper attempts to revive the lattice model and demonstrate its applicability in an information retrieval system, FalR, that incorporates a graphical representation of a faceted thesaurus. It shows how Boolean queries can be lattice-theoretically related to the concepts of the thesaurus and visualized within the thesaurus display. An advantage of FaIR is that it allows for a high level of transparency of the system, which can be controlled by the user
  10. Priss, U.; Old, L.J.: Concept neighbourhoods in knowledge organisation systems (2010) 0.01
    0.010510502 = product of:
      0.06306301 = sum of:
        0.06306301 = product of:
          0.12612602 = sum of:
            0.12612602 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12612602 = score(doc=3527,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.5776348 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the application of concept neighbourhoods (in the sense of formal concept analysis) to knowledge organisation systems. Examples are provided using Roget's Thesaurus, WordNet and Wikipedia categories.
    Object
    Roget's Thesaurus
  11. Vogt, C.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse : Darstellung und Analyse von bibliographischen Daten (1994) 0.01
    0.008462295 = product of:
      0.050773766 = sum of:
        0.050773766 = weight(_text_:und in 7603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050773766 = score(doc=7603,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 7603, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7603)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Informations- und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften: Beiträge zur Umsetzung neuer Informationstechnologien. Hrsg.: H. Best u.a
  12. Ganter, B.: Begriffe und Implikationen (2000) 0.01
    0.008462295 = product of:
      0.050773766 = sum of:
        0.050773766 = weight(_text_:und in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050773766 = score(doc=4195,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler. Hrsg.: G. Stumme u. R. Wille
  13. Sedelow, S.Y.; Sedelow, W.A.: Thesauri and concept-lattice semantic nets (1994) 0.01
    0.0074320463 = product of:
      0.044592276 = sum of:
        0.044592276 = product of:
          0.08918455 = sum of:
            0.08918455 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08918455 = score(doc=7733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Formal concept lattices are a promising vehicle for the construction of rigorous and empirically accurate semantic nets. Presented here are results of initial experiments with concept lattices as representations of semantic relationships in the implicit structure of a large database (e.g. Roget's thesaurus)
  14. Kollewe, W.; Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA als Instrument der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (1995) 0.01
    0.007402966 = product of:
      0.044417795 = sum of:
        0.044417795 = weight(_text_:und in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044417795 = score(doc=927,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Imprint
    Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
  15. Ganter, B.; Wille, R.: Implikationen und Abhängigkeiten zwischen Merkmalen (1986) 0.01
    0.0072533954 = product of:
      0.043520372 = sum of:
        0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043520372 = score(doc=5448,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
  16. Kollewe, W.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - ein Werkzeug zur begrifflichen Analyse und Erkundung von Daten (1994) 0.01
    0.0072533954 = product of:
      0.043520372 = sum of:
        0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 8942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043520372 = score(doc=8942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 8942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8942)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Grundfragen und Aufgaben. Hrsg.: R. Wille u. M. Zickwolff
  17. Strack, H.; Skorsky, M.: Zugriffskontrolle bei Programmsystemen und im Datenschutz mittels Formaler Begriffsanalyse (2000) 0.01
    0.0072533954 = product of:
      0.043520372 = sum of:
        0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043520372 = score(doc=4200,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler. Hrsg.: G. Stumme u. R. Wille
  18. Kohler-Koch, B.; Vogt, F.: Normen- und regelgeleitete internationale Kooperationen : Formale Begriffsanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft (2000) 0.01
    0.0072533954 = product of:
      0.043520372 = sum of:
        0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043520372 = score(doc=4206,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler. Hrsg.: G. Stumme u. R. Wille
  19. Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998) 0.01
    0.006503041 = product of:
      0.039018244 = sum of:
        0.039018244 = product of:
          0.07803649 = sum of:
            0.07803649 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07803649 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a graphical interface for the navigation and construction of faceted thesauri that is based on formal concept analysis. Each facet of a thesaurus is represented as a mathematical lattice that is further subdivided into components. Users can graphically navigate through the Java implementation of the interface by clicking on terms that connect facets and components. Since there are many applications for thesauri in the knowledge representation field, such a graphical interface has the potential of being very useful
  20. Zickwolff, M.: Zur Rolle der Formalen Begriffsanalyse in der Wissensakquisition (1994) 0.01
    0.0059837457 = product of:
      0.035902474 = sum of:
        0.035902474 = weight(_text_:und in 8938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035902474 = score(doc=8938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 8938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8938)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Grundfragen und Aufgaben. Hrsg.: R. Wille u. M. Zickwolff