Search (52 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.61 
    0.61002433 = product of:
  0.7320292 = sum of:
    0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030773548 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
    0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14684197 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
    0.08321418 = weight(_text_:des in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08321418 = score(doc=6404,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.63594294 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
    0.20518874 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20518874 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.75878 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
    0.26601076 = sum of:
      0.18918902 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18918902 = score(doc=6404,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.8664522 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.07682176 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07682176 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
  0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.56 
    0.5638475 = product of:
  0.676617 = sum of:
    0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030773548 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
    0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14684197 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
    0.08321418 = weight(_text_:des in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08321418 = score(doc=3773,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.63594294 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
    0.20518874 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20518874 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.75878 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
    0.2105986 = sum of:
      0.13377684 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13377684 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.61267424 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.07682176 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07682176 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
  0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Gopinath, M.A.; Prasad, K.N.: Compatibility of the principles for design of thesaurus and classification scheme (1976) 0.44 
    0.4378687 = product of:
  0.5254425 = sum of:
    0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030773548 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
    0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14684197 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
    0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04804372 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
    0.20518874 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20518874 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.75878 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
    0.09459451 = product of:
      0.18918902 = sum of:
        0.18918902 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18918902 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.8664522 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.08 
    0.08226665 = product of:
  0.1645333 = sum of:
    0.0410314 = weight(_text_:und in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0410314 = score(doc=4339,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
    0.097894646 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.097894646 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
    0.025607252 = product of:
      0.051214505 = sum of:
        0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051214505 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag skizziert die Grundlagen der Arbeit mit Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken und erläutert die Grundbegriffe der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie. Schwerpunkte bilden die Ordnungsprinzipien und Strukturierungsmittel von Klassifikationen sowie die verschiedenen Klassifikationstypologien. Dabei werden vorzugsweise Beispiele aus Klassifikationen verwendet, die im deutschen Sprachraum verbreitet sind.
    Pages
    S.1-22
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 53
    Source
    Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg.: H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
  5. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.05 
    0.048971433 = product of:
  0.09794287 = sum of:
    0.035902474 = weight(_text_:und in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035902474 = score(doc=3494,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
    0.03963405 = weight(_text_:des in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03963405 = score(doc=3494,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.302893 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
    0.022406347 = product of:
      0.044812694 = sum of:
        0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044812694 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  6. Franz, S.; Lopatka, T.; Kunze, G.; Meyn, N.; Strupler, N.: Un/Doing Classification : Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme zwischen Universalitätsanspruch und reduktionistischer Wissensorganisation (2022) 0.03 
    0.025967881 = product of:
  0.07790364 = sum of:
    0.0458745 = weight(_text_:und in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0458745 = score(doc=675,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.438048 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
    0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03202915 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Der multiperspektivische Beitrag analysiert mit einem intersektionalen und qualitativen Ansatz diskriminierende Begriffe, Auslassungen und implizit abwertende Strukturen bibliothekarischer Klassifikationen des Globalen Nordens. Am Beispiel der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) werden rassistische und sexistische Schnitt- sowie Leerstellen in der Repräsentation queerer Lebens-, Liebes- und Lustentwürfe aufgezeigt. Mögliche Lösungen unter Einbeziehung der Communitys runden den Beitrag ab.
  7. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.02 
    0.023634437 = product of:
  0.07090331 = sum of:
    0.045296054 = weight(_text_:des in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045296054 = score(doc=1171,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.34616345 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
    0.025607252 = product of:
      0.051214505 = sum of:
        0.051214505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051214505 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Concerning the Dewey classification
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  8. Rescheleit, W.; Menner, L.: Vergleich der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL mit Dezimalklassifikation und Facettenklassifikation (1986) 0.02 
    0.022792637 = product of:
  0.06837791 = sum of:
    0.034405876 = weight(_text_:und in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034405876 = score(doc=1555,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.328536 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
    0.03397204 = weight(_text_:des in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03397204 = score(doc=1555,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.25962257 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Beim Vergleich von Klassifikationen mit Frame-Wissensbasen für Expertensysteme zeigen sich einige elementare Gemeinsamkeiten: Beide haben das Ziel einer geordneten Darstellung von Wissen. Beide bilden dazu Klassen und weisen hierarchische Beziehungen zwischen diesen Klassen auf. Anahnd der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL (Frame Representation Language) wird untersucht, inwieweit beide Systeme sich in das jeweils andere übertragen lassen. Die FRL speichert Wissen in einer speziellen Datenstruktur, den Frames, die aus einem Framenamen, der den jeweiligen Begriff bezeichnet, und Slots, die die Eigenschaften des Begriffs enthalten, bestehen. Eine effektive Speicherung des Wissens wird dadurch erreicht, daß die Frames in einer polyhierarchischen Struktur geordnet sind und in generischer Relation zueinander stehen müssen. Über die generische Relation lassen sich die Eigenschaften höherer Begriffe auf ihre Subklassen vererben. Es werden die Ergebnisse eines Versuchs dargestellt, Elemente bestehender Universalklassifikationen (DK, BC2) in die FRL zu übertragen
    Source
    Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
  9. Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995) 0.02 
    0.022347918 = product of:
  0.06704375 = sum of:
    0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028025504 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
    0.039018244 = product of:
      0.07803649 = sum of:
        0.07803649 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07803649 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Rethinking UDC
  10. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.02 
    0.017549884 = product of:
  0.1052993 = sum of:
    0.1052993 = sum of:
      0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06688842 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03841088 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01 
    0.014624903 = product of:
  0.087749414 = sum of:
    0.087749414 = sum of:
      0.055740345 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055740345 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.2552809 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
      0.03200907 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200907 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
  12. Negrini, G.; Zozi, P.: Ontological analysis of the literary work of art (2003) 0.01 
    0.009654513 = product of:
  0.057927076 = sum of:
    0.057927076 = product of:
      0.11585415 = sum of:
        0.11585415 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11585415 = score(doc=2687,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5305915 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Ontological structures can aid the understanding and modelling of works of art. Ontology of the aesthetic object, and particularly of the literary work, has been analysed by Hartmann and Ingarden. Application of Dahlberg's ontical 'systematifier' model enabled us to organize the entire structure of the Thesaurus of Italian Literature, and to highlight a number of significant aspects of the literary work. After describing the conclusions arising from the experience of compiling the thesaurus, the paper briefly outlines Hartmann's and Ingarden's theories of levels and seeks to identify commonalities between the ontological analysis of the two theories and the conclusions of the thesaurus.
  13. Henrichs, N.: Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Bibliotheksklassifikation? (1979) 0.01 
    0.008883559 = product of:
  0.053301353 = sum of:
    0.053301353 = weight(_text_:und in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053301353 = score(doc=1423,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
  14. Gödert, W.: Strukturierung von Klassifikationssystemen und Online-Retrieval (1995) 0.01 
    0.0085482085 = product of:
  0.05128925 = sum of:
    0.05128925 = weight(_text_:und in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05128925 = score(doc=922,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Imprint
    Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
  15. Kluth, R.: Schlagwortindex und Schlagwortkatalog (1957) 0.01 
    0.008462295 = product of:
  0.050773766 = sum of:
    0.050773766 = weight(_text_:und in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050773766 = score(doc=273,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 4(1957), S.169-176
  16. Weinberger, O.: Begriffsstruktur und Klassifikation (1980) 0.01 
    0.007915752 = product of:
  0.04749451 = sum of:
    0.04749451 = weight(_text_:und in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04749451 = score(doc=1440,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Klassifikation kann sich auf verschiedene Gegenstandsbereiche beziehen. Sie ist im Prinzip eine extensionale Vorgangsweise resp. ein extensionales Gebilde auch dann, wenn ihr Gegenstand begriffliche Gebilde bzw. Wissen (Wissensbestandteile) sind. Die Erstellung dieses extensionalen Gebildes, das wir 'Klassat' nennen, beruht auf begrifflichen Analysen. Die Probleme der Begriffstrukturen, der Definitionen und der verschiedenen Eigentümlichkeiten gewisser Begriffe der pragmatischen Sprachen stellen daher Grundlagenprobleme der Klassifikationstheorie dar. Hieraus ergibt sich die Aufgabenstellung: Skizzzierung der logischen Grundstruktur der Klassifikation, Hinweis auf die Relevanz methodologischer Momente der Problemsituation für das Klassieren und auf gewisse strukturelle und semantische Eigentümlichkeiten der Begriffsapparatur der modernen Wissenschaften und der Umgangssprache, die Probleme der Klassifizierungsaufgaben mit such bringen und die bewirken, daß die Klassifikationen oft als praktische Annäherungen anzusehen sind
    Source
    Wissensstrukturen und Ordnungsmuster. Proc. der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Salzburg, 16.-19.4.1980. Red.: W. Dahlberg
  17. Kleineberg, M.: Klassifikation (2023) 0.01 
    0.007915752 = product of:
  0.04749451 = sum of:
    0.04749451 = weight(_text_:und in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04749451 = score(doc=783,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag nimmt eine informationswissenschaftliche Perspektive ein und betrachtet das Phänomen der Klassifikation als Methode und System der Wissensorganisation. Ein Klassifikationssystem wird dabei als Wissensorganisationssystem (engl. knowledge organization system) verstanden, das vor allem im Bereich der Information und Dokumentation zum Einsatz kommt, um dokumentarische Bezugseinheiten (DBE) mit einem kontrollierten Vokabular zu beschreiben (s. Kapitel B 1 Einführung Wissensorganisation). Als eine solche Dokumentationssprache zeichnet sich ein Klassifikationssystem typischerweise durch seine systematische Ordnung aus und dient der inhaltlichen Groberschließung, eignet sich aber auch als Aufstellungssystematik und Hilfsmittel bei der Recherche wie etwa als systematischer Sucheinstieg oder thematischer Filter für Treffermengen. Beim Information Retrieval liegt die Stärke der klassifikatorischen Erschließung durch das hohe Abstraktionsniveau in Überblicks- und Vollständigkeitsrecherchen.
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  18. Gödert, W.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme und on-line-Kataloge : Grundlagen und Anwendungen (1987) 0.01 
    0.006838567 = product of:
  0.0410314 = sum of:
    0.0410314 = weight(_text_:und in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0410314 = score(doc=4576,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag beabsichtigen wir, einen Überblick über den derzeitigen Stand der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie zu geben. Die Darstellung ist angelehnt an die 1985 erschienene Norm DIN 32 705,Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen', stellt jedoch die Problematik bibliothekarischer Klassifikationssysteme in den Vordergrund. In einem zweiten Teil beschäftigen wir uns mit Problemen von Klassifikationssystemen in typischen bibliothekarischen Anwendungsbereichen. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf dem Online-Katalog; es wird ein Vorschlag zur Verwendung von Facettenklassifikationen diskutiert. Abschließend werden Fragen der kooperativen klassifikatorischen Inhaltserschließung gestreift.
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 11(1987) H.2, S.152-166
  19. Araghi, G.F.: ¬A new scheme for library classification (2004) 0.01 
    0.006503041 = product of:
  0.039018244 = sum of:
    0.039018244 = product of:
      0.07803649 = sum of:
        0.07803649 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07803649 = score(doc=5659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 5659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This proposed new classification scheme is based on two main elements: hierarchism and binary theory. Hence, it is called Universal Binary Classification (UBC). Some advantages of this classification are highlighted including are subject heading development, construction of a thesaurus and all terms with meaningful features arranged in tabular form that can help researchers, through a semantic process, to find what they need. This classification scheme is fully consistent with the classification of knowledge. The classification of knowledge is also based on hierarchism and binary principle. Finally, a survey on randomly selected books in McLennan Library of McGill University is presented to compare the codes of this new classification with the currently employed Library of Congress Classification (LCC) numbers in the discipline of Library and Information Sciences.
  20. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01 
    0.0064018136 = product of:
  0.03841088 = sum of:
    0.03841088 = product of:
      0.07682176 = sum of:
        0.07682176 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07682176 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 34
  • d 10
  • f 3
  • i 2
  • sp 2
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Themes