-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990)
0.48
0.48391038 = product of:
0.58069247 = sum of:
0.035902474 = weight(_text_:und in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035902474 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.17131563 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17131563 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.74887794 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.05605101 = weight(_text_:des in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05605101 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.4283554 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.23938686 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23938686 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.88524336 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.07803649 = product of:
0.15607297 = sum of:
0.15607297 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15607297 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.7147866 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Gopinath, M.A.; Prasad, K.N.: Compatibility of the principles for design of thesaurus and classification scheme (1976)
0.44
0.4378687 = product of:
0.5254425 = sum of:
0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773548 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14684197 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04804372 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.20518874 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20518874 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.75878 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.09459451 = product of:
0.18918902 = sum of:
0.18918902 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18918902 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.8664522 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.38
0.37753093 = product of:
0.45303714 = sum of:
0.04397137 = weight(_text_:und in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04397137 = score(doc=4792,freq=12.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.08565781 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08565781 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.0485416 = weight(_text_:des in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0485416 = score(doc=4792,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3709667 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.11969343 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11969343 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.44262168 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.15517296 = sum of:
0.110360265 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110360265 = score(doc=4792,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.50543046 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044812694 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.36
0.35941988 = product of:
0.43130386 = sum of:
0.017951237 = weight(_text_:und in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017951237 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.08565781 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08565781 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028025504 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.11969343 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11969343 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.44262168 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.17997587 = sum of:
0.13516317 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13516317 = score(doc=1149,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.6190234 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.044812694 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044812694 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Faceted thesauri (2008)
0.28
0.2765202 = product of:
0.33182424 = sum of:
0.0205157 = weight(_text_:und in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0205157 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
0.097894646 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097894646 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03202915 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
0.1367925 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1367925 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.50585335 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
0.044592276 = product of:
0.08918455 = sum of:
0.08918455 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08918455 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008)
0.26
0.2585687 = product of:
0.31028247 = sum of:
0.021760186 = weight(_text_:und in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021760186 = score(doc=5448,freq=4.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07342099 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02402186 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259437 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.37939 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.08848506 = product of:
0.17697012 = sum of:
0.17697012 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17697012 = score(doc=5448,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.81049186 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- In this paper the possibility to develop a richer relational structure for thesauri is explored and described. The development of a new environmental thesaurus - EARTh (Environmental Applications Reference Thesaurus) - is serving as a case study for exploring the refinement of thesaurus relational structure by specialising standard relationships into different subtypes. Together with benefits and opportunities, implications and possible challenges that an expanded set of thesaurus relations may cause are evaluated.
- Object
- EARTh-Thesaurus
- Source
- Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Engerer, V.: Thesauri, Terminologien, Lexika, Fachsprachen : Kontrolle, physische Verortung und das Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung von Vokabularen (2014)
0.25
0.24548918 = product of:
0.29458702 = sum of:
0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043520372 = score(doc=3644,freq=16.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07342099 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.04160709 = weight(_text_:des in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04160709 = score(doc=3644,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.31797147 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259437 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.37939 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.03344421 = product of:
0.06688842 = sum of:
0.06688842 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06688842 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Ich unternehme in diesem Beitrag den Versuch, die Informationswissenschaft - hier gedeutet als 'Information Retrieval'- Disziplin - einer synchronen Querschnittsanalyse zu unterziehen, welche die aktuelle Position dieser Disziplin im Feld anderer zeichen- und wortschatzorientierter Disziplinen (neben der Linguistik die Terminologielehre und die Fachsprachenforschung) näher bestimmen soll. Im Rahmen der Analyse wird von einem Information Retrieval-Kern der Informationswissenschaft ausgegangen, welcher den Informationssuchkontext sowie die Konzepte des Informationsbedarfs und der Relevanz als für diese Disziplin zentrale Komponenten ansieht. Synchron wird das Verhältnis der Informationswissenschaft zu benachbarten Disziplinen durch eine Reihe disziplinspezifischer Zeichenanforderungen erklärt, wodurch ein systemischer Zusammenhang entsteht, der die Informationswissenschaft mit den drei anderen zeichenbezogenen und vokabularorientierten Disziplinen in Beziehung setzt. Das Verhältnis zwischen diesen Disziplinen wird anhand der Dimensionen Kontrolle/Verbindlichkeit sowie Verortung des Vokabulars ("im Kopf" vs. in externen Dokumenten) aufgezeigt, und es wird ein übergeordnetes Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung, welches die beiden Dimensionen vereint, vorgeschlagen.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.99-108
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Hudon, M.: ¬A preliminary investigation of the usefulness of semantic relations and of standardized definitions for the purpose of specifying meaning in a thesaurus (1998)
0.24
0.2418396 = product of:
0.29020754 = sum of:
0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015386774 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07342099 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02402186 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259437 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.37939 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.07478353 = product of:
0.14956705 = sum of:
0.14956705 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14956705 = score(doc=55,freq=10.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.68499064 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- The terminological consistency of indexers working with a thesaurus as indexing aid remains low. This suggests that indexers cannot perceive easily or very clearly the meaning of each descriptor available as index term. This paper presents the background nd some of the findings of a small scale experiment designed to study the effect on interindexer terminological consistency of modifying the nature of the semantic information given with descriptors in a thesaurus. The study also provided some insights into the respective usefulness of standardized definitions and of traditional networks of hierarchical and associative relationships as means of providing essential meaning information in the thesaurus used as indexing aid
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Milstead, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms (2001)
0.23
0.22779256 = product of:
0.27335107 = sum of:
0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015386774 = score(doc=1148,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07342099 = score(doc=1148,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02402186 = score(doc=1148,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259437 = score(doc=1148,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.37939 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
0.057927076 = product of:
0.11585415 = sum of:
0.11585415 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11585415 = score(doc=1148,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5305915 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Relationships between the terms in thesauri and Indexes are the subject of national and international standards. The standards for thesauri enumerate and provide criteria for three basic types of relationship: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. Standards and guidelines for indexes draw an the thesaurus standards to provide less detailed guidance for showing relationships between the terms used in an Index. The international standard for multilingual thesauri adds recommendations for assuring equal treatment of the languages of a thesaurus. The present standards were developed when lookup and search were essentially manual, and the value of the kinds of relationships has never been determined. It is not clear whether users understand or can use the distinctions between kinds of relationships. On the other hand, sophisticated text analysis systems may be able both to assist with development of more powerful term relationship schemes and to use the relationships to improve retrieval.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Engerer, V.: Control and syntagmatization : vocabulary requirements in information retrieval thesauri and natural language lexicons (2017)
0.23
0.22779256 = product of:
0.27335107 = sum of:
0.015386774 = weight(_text_:und in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015386774 = score(doc=3678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.07342099 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07342099 = score(doc=3678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02402186 = score(doc=3678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.10259437 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259437 = score(doc=3678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.37939 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.057927076 = product of:
0.11585415 = sum of:
0.11585415 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11585415 = score(doc=3678,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5305915 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the relationships between natural language lexicons in lexical semantics and thesauri in information retrieval research. These different areas of knowledge have different restrictions on use of vocabulary; thesauri are used only in information search and retrieval contexts, whereas lexicons are mental systems and generally applicable in all domains of life. A set of vocabulary requirements that defines the more concrete characteristics of vocabulary items in the 2 contexts can be derived from this framework: lexicon items have to be learnable, complex, transparent, etc., whereas thesaurus terms must be effective, current and relevant, searchable, etc. The differences in vocabulary properties correlate with 2 other factors, the well-known dimension of Control (deliberate, social activities of building and maintaining vocabularies), and Syntagmatization, which is less known and describes vocabulary items' varying formal preparedness to exit the thesaurus/lexicon, enter into linear syntactic constructions, and, finally, acquire communicative functionality. It is proposed that there is an inverse relationship between Control and Syntagmatization.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001)
0.22
0.21529064 = product of:
0.25834876 = sum of:
0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012822312 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061184157 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020018218 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08549531 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.07882876 = product of:
0.15765752 = sum of:
0.15765752 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15765752 = score(doc=1520,freq=16.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.7220435 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses issues concerning the augmentation of thesaurus relationships, in light of new application possibilities for retrieval. We first discuss a case study that explored the retrieval potential of an augmented set of thesaurus relationships by specialising standard relationships into richer subtypes, in particular hierarchical geographical containment and the associative relationship. We then locate this work in a broader context by reviewing various attempts to build taxonomies of thesaurus relationships, and conclude by discussing the feasibility of hierarchically augmenting the core set of thesaurus relationships, particularly the associative relationship. We discuss the possibility of enriching the specification and semantics of Related Term (RT relationships), while maintaining compatibility with traditional thesauri via a limited hierarchical extension of the associative (and hierarchical) relationships. This would be facilitated by distinguishing the type of term from the (sub)type of relationship and explicitly specifying semantic categories for terms following a faceted approach. We first illustrate how hierarchical spatial relationships can be used to provide more flexible retrieval for queries incorporating place names in applications employing online gazetteers and geographical thesauri. We then employ a set of experimental scenarios to investigate key issues affecting use of the associative (RT) thesaurus relationships in semantic distance measures. Previous work has noted the potential of RTs in thesaurus search aids but also the problem of uncontrolled expansion of query term sets. Results presented in this paper suggest the potential for taking account of the hierarchical context of an RT link and specialisations of the RT relationship
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Tiberi, M.; De Santis, B.; Plini, P.: Relational semantics in thesauri : an overview and some remarks at theoretical and practical levels (2007)
0.20
0.19605027 = product of:
0.23526034 = sum of:
0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012822312 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061184157 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020018218 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08549531 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
0.055740345 = product of:
0.11148069 = sum of:
0.11148069 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11148069 = score(doc=1462,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5105618 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- A thesaurus is a controlled vocabulary designed to allow for effective information retrieval. It con- sists of different kinds of semantic relationships, with the aim of guiding users to the choice of the most suitable index and search terms for expressing a certain concept. The relational semantics of a thesaurus deal with methods to connect terms with related meanings and arc intended to enhance information recall capabilities. In this paper, focused on hierarchical relations, different aspects of the relational semantics of thesauri, and among them the possibility of developing richer structures, are analyzed. Thesauri are viewed as semantic tools providing, for operational purposes, the representation of the meaning of the terms. The paper stresses how theories of semantics, holding different perspectives about the nature of meaning and how it is represented, affect the design of the relational semantics of thesauri. The need for tools capable of representing the complexity of knowledge and of the semantics of terms as it occurs in the literature of their respective subject fields is advocated. It is underlined how this would contribute to improving the retrieval of information. To achieve this goal, even though in a preliminary manner, we explore the possibility of setting against the framework of thesaurus design the notions of language games and hermeneutic horizon.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Gilchrist, A.; Will, L.: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards (2004)
0.17
0.16519178 = product of:
0.19823015 = sum of:
0.01025785 = weight(_text_:und in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01025785 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.048947323 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048947323 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.21396513 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.016014574 = weight(_text_:des in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016014574 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.06839625 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06839625 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.25292668 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.054614164 = product of:
0.10922833 = sum of:
0.10922833 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10922833 = score(doc=2615,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5002464 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- The current standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri are long overdue for an update. This applies to the international standards ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, as well as the corresponding national standards in several countries and the American standard ANSI/NISO Z39.19. Work is now under way in the UK and in the USA to revise and extend the standards, with particular emphasis on interoperability needs in our world of vast electronic networks. Work in the UK is starting with the British Standards, in the hope of leading on to one international standard to serve all. Some of the issues still under discussion include the treatment of facet analysis, coverage of additional types of controlled vocabulary such as classification schemes, taxonomies and ontologies, and mapping from one vocabulary to another. 1. Are thesaurus standards still needed? Since the 1960s, even before the renowned Cranfield experiments (Cleverdon et al., 1966; Cleverdon, 1967) arguments have raged over the usefulness or otherwise of controlled vocabularies. The case has never been proved definitively one way or the other. At the same time, a recognition has become widespread that no one search method can answer all retrieval requirements. In today's environment of very large networks of resources, the skilled information professional uses a range of techniques. Among these, controlled vocabularies are valued alongside others. The first international standard for monolingual thesauri was issued in 1974. In those days, the main application was for postcoordinate indexing and retrieval from document collections or bibliographic databases. For many information professionals the only practicable alternative to a thesaurus was a classification scheme. And so the thesaurus developed a strong following. After computer systems with full text search capability became widely available, however, the arguments against controlled vocabularies gained more followers. The cost of building and maintaining a thesaurus or a classification scheme was a strong disincentive. Today's databases are typically immense compared with those three decades ago. Full text searching is taken for granted, not just in discrete databases but across all the resources in an intranet or even the Internet. But intranets have brought particular frustration as users discover that despite all the computer power, they cannot find items which they know to be present an the network. So the trend against controlled vocabularies is now being reversed, as many information professionals are turning to them for help. Standards to guide them are still in demand.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.16
0.16074404 = product of:
0.19289285 = sum of:
0.0089756185 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0089756185 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.042828906 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042828906 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.18721949 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.019817024 = weight(_text_:des in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019817024 = score(doc=3644,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.1514465 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.059846714 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059846714 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.22131084 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.06142459 = sum of:
0.039018244 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039018244 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.17869665 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.022406347 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022406347 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Grenzen des Thesaurus-Verfahrens bei der Wiedergabe von Begriffsrelationen (1975)
0.05
0.051080953 = product of:
0.15324286 = sum of:
0.0640583 = weight(_text_:des in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640583 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.48954904 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
0.08918455 = product of:
0.1783691 = sum of:
0.1783691 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1783691 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.81689894 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.04
0.04094973 = product of:
0.24569836 = sum of:
0.24569836 = sum of:
0.15607297 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15607297 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.7147866 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962539 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
-
Sechser, O.: Beziehungen im Sprachsystem und in Texten (1992)
0.03
0.030521363 = product of:
0.09156409 = sum of:
0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043520372 = score(doc=1369,freq=4.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04804372 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen von Wissen. 2. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO Sektion einschl. der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie", Weilburg, 15.-18.10.1991
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Funktion von semantischen Kategorien in Indexierungssprachen und bei der Indexierung (1986)
0.03
0.02643228 = product of:
0.079296835 = sum of:
0.037689745 = weight(_text_:und in 1554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037689745 = score(doc=1554,freq=12.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1554, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1554)
0.04160709 = weight(_text_:des in 1554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04160709 = score(doc=1554,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.31797147 = fieldWeight in 1554, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1554)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Wenn man unter "Indexierung" den zweistufigen Prozeß (a) des Erkennens der Essenz eines wiederauffindbar zu machenden Textes und (b) des Wiedergebens dieser Essenz in einer ausreichend wiedergabetreuen und genügend gut voraussagbaren Form versteht, dann kann die Qualität der Indexierung gesteigert werden, wenn sie unter besonderer Beachtung der Begriffe aus einer kleinen Zahl von besonders wichtigen semantischen Kategorien erfolgt. Bei der Gestaltung der Indexierungssprache müssen die Begriffe aus diesen Kategorien in der erforderlichen Detailliertheit in den Wortschatz aufgenommen werden, und Präkombinationen, die zu "multikategorialen" Begroffen führen, sind möglichst weitgehend zu vermeiden. Präkombinationen, die ausschließlich durch Einbeziehung von häufig vorkommenden ("ubiquitätren") monokategorialen Begriffen gebildet werden, können und sollen aus pragmatischen Gründen für den Wortschatz zugelassen werden. Das Konzept des "Relationenweges" erklärt, inwiefern solche Präkombinationen für den Wortschatz nicht schädlich sind
- Source
- Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
-
Panzer, M.: Semantische Integration heterogener und unterschiedlichsprachiger Wissensorganisationssysteme : CrissCross und jenseits (2008)
0.02
0.023646515 = product of:
0.07093954 = sum of:
0.036266975 = weight(_text_:und in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036266975 = score(doc=4335,freq=16.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
0.03467257 = weight(_text_:des in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03467257 = score(doc=4335,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2649762 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Klassische bibliothekarische Indexierungswerkzeuge werden bis heute nur selten fürs Retrieval nutzbar gemacht; die Wichtigkeit, verschiedene dieser Vokabularien zu harmonisieren und integriert zu verwenden, ist noch immer keine Selbstverständlichkeit. Im Rahmen des DFG-Projektes "CrissCross" wird, ausgehend von der deutschen Ausgabe der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation, eine Verknüpfung zwischen der DDC und der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) aufgebaut, um eine verbale Suche über klassifikatorisch erschlossene Bestände zu ermöglichen. Als Verbreiterung der Basis des verbalen Zugriffs wird außerdem das Mapping der amerikanischen LCSH und des französischen RAMEAU angestrebt. Nach einer kurzen Vorstellung von CrissCross und der Abgrenzung gegenüber ähnlichen Unterfangen werden Rückwirkungen semantischer Integration auf die verknüpften Vokabulare diskutiert. Wie müssen und können sich z.B. Thesauri verändern, wenn sie mit anderen (strukturheterologen) Systemen verknüpft sind? Dabei liegt ein Schwerpunkt der Analyse auf dem semantischen Verhältnis üblicher Mappingrelationen zu den verknüpften Begriffen (besonders im Hinblick auf Polysemie). Außerdem wird der Mehrwert fürs Retrieval auf der Basis solcher Wissensorganisationssysteme, z.B. durch automatisierten Zugriff über Ontologien, diskutiert.
- Source
- Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Krömmelbein, U.: Linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte der Schlagwortsyntax : Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, der RSWK und der Indexierungsverfahren Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS (1984)
0.02
0.022514079 = product of:
0.06754223 = sum of:
0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043520372 = score(doc=984,freq=16.0), product of:
0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02402186 = score(doc=984,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Die deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt bietet seit einigen Jahren zentrale Dienste im Bereich der verbalen Sacherschließung an, Um deren Akzeptanz zu verbessern, will die Deutsche Bibliothek ab 1986 von der augenblicklichen gleichordnenden Indexierung zu einem syntaktischen Verfahren übergehen. Als Alternativen standen die RSWK und eine verkürzte Version des britischen Indexierungsverfahrens PRECIS zur Diskussion. Die Anforderungen einer Fachwissenschaft an die Schlagwort-Syntax einer adäquaten Dokumentationssprache werden exemplarisch entwickelt, die vier Alternativen - augenblickliche verbale Sacherschließunf der DB, RSWK, PRECIS (britische Version) und Kurz-PRECIS (DB-Version) - an ihnen gemessen. Die Kriterien basiern auf Grammatiktheorien der modernen Linguistik und gehen von einer Analogie zwischen Dokumentationssprachen und natürlicher Sprache aus.
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 8(1984), S.159-202
