Search (2433 results, page 122 of 122)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Torres-Salinas, D.; Gorraiz, J.; Robinson-Garcia, N.: ¬The insoluble problems of books : what does Altmetric.com have to offer? (2018) 0.00 
    0.0021339378 = product of:
  0.012803626 = sum of:
    0.012803626 = product of:
      0.025607252 = sum of:
        0.025607252 = weight(_text_:22 in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025607252 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  2. Greiner-Petter, A.; Schubotz, M.; Cohl, H.S.; Gipp, B.: Semantic preserving bijective mappings for expressions involving special functions between computer algebra systems and document preparation systems (2019) 0.00 
    0.0021339378 = product of:
  0.012803626 = sum of:
    0.012803626 = product of:
      0.025607252 = sum of:
        0.025607252 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025607252 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Information and living systems : philosophical and scientific perspectives (2011) 0.00 
    0.0021155737 = product of:
  0.0126934415 = sum of:
    0.0126934415 = weight(_text_:und in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0126934415 = score(doc=3,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.12120757 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    BK
    42.02 / Philosophie und Theorie der Biologie
    Classification
    42.02 / Philosophie und Theorie der Biologie
  4. Theories of information, communication and knowledge : a multidisciplinary approach (2014) 0.00 
    0.0021155737 = product of:
  0.0126934415 = sum of:
    0.0126934415 = weight(_text_:und in 2110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0126934415 = score(doc=2110,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.12120757 = fieldWeight in 2110, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2110)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    RSWK
    Information / Kommunikation / Wissen / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Kongress / Lyon <2011>
    Subject
    Information / Kommunikation / Wissen / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Kongress / Lyon <2011>
  5. Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014) 0.00 
    0.0021155737 = product of:
  0.0126934415 = sum of:
    0.0126934415 = weight(_text_:und in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0126934415 = score(doc=2274,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.12120757 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    BK
    06.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    06.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
  6. Koch, C.: Consciousness : confessions of a romantic reductionist (2012) 0.00 
    0.0018873357 = product of:
  0.011324014 = sum of:
    0.011324014 = weight(_text_:des in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011324014 = score(doc=4561,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.08654086 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    What links conscious experience of pain, joy, color, and smell to bioelectrical activity in the brain? How can anything physical give rise to nonphysical, subjective, conscious states? Christof Koch has devoted much of his career to bridging the seemingly unbridgeable gap between the physics of the brain and phenomenal experience. This engaging book?part scientific overview, part memoir, part futurist speculation?describes Koch's search for an empirical explanation for consciousness. Koch recounts not only the birth of the modern science of consciousness but also the subterranean motivation for his quest?his instinctual (if "romantic") belief that life is meaningful. Koch describes his own groundbreaking work with Francis Crick in the 1990s and 2000s and the gradual emergence of consciousness (once considered a "fringy" subject) as a legitimate topic for scientific investigation. Present at this paradigm shift were Koch and a handful of colleagues, including Ned Block, David Chalmers, Stanislas Dehaene, Giulio Tononi, Wolf Singer, and others. Aiding and abetting it were new techniques to listen in on the activity of individual nerve cells, clinical studies, and brain-imaging technologies that allowed safe and noninvasive study of the human brain in action. Koch gives us stories from the front lines of modern research into the neurobiology of consciousness as well as his own reflections on a variety of topics, including the distinction between attention and awareness, the unconscious, how neurons respond to Homer Simpson, the physics and biology of free will, dogs, Der Ring des Nibelungen, sentient machines, the loss of his belief in a personal God, and sadness. All of them are signposts in the pursuit of his life's work?to uncover the roots of consciousness
    Content
    In which I introduce the ancient mind-body problem, explain why I am on a quest to use reason and empirical inquiry to solve it, acquaint you with Francis Crick, explain how he relates to this quest, make a confession, and end on a sad note -- In which I write about the wellsprings of my inner conflict between religion and reason, why I grew up wanting to be a scientist, why I wear a lapel pin of Professor Calculus, and how I acquired a second mentor late in life -- In which I explain why consciousness challenges the scientific view of the world, how consciousness can be investigated empirically with both feet firmly planted on the ground, why animals share consciousness with humans, and why self-consciousness is not as important as many people think it is -- In which you hear tales of scientist-magicians that make you look but not see, how they track the footprints of consciousness by peering into your skull, why you don't see with your eyes, and why attention and consciousness are not the same -- In which you learn from neurologists and neurosurgeons that some neurons care a great deal about celebrities, that cutting the cerebral cortex in two does not reduce consciousness by half, that color is leached from the world by the loss of a small cortical region, and that the destruction of a sugar cube-sized chunk of brain stem or thalamic tissue leaves you undead -- In which I defend two propositions that my younger self found nonsense--you are unaware of most of the things that go on in your head, and zombie agents control much of your life, even though you confidently believe that you are in charge -- In which I throw caution to the wind, bring up free will, Der ring des Nibelungen, and what physics says about determinism, explain the impoverished ability of your mind to choose, show that your will lags behind your brain's decision, and that freedom is just another word for feeling -- In which I argue that consciousness is a fundamental property of complex things, rhapsodize about integrated information theory, how it explains many puzzling facts about consciousness and provides a blueprint for building sentient machines -- In which I outline an electromagnetic gadget to measure consciousness, describe efforts to harness the power of genetic engineering to track consciousness in mice, and find myself building cortical observatories -- In which I muse about final matters considered off-limits to polite scientific discourse: to wit, the relationship between science and religion, the existence of God, whether this God can intervene in the universe, the death of my mentor, and my recent tribulations.
  7. Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014) 0.00 
    0.0018671956 = product of:
  0.011203174 = sum of:
    0.011203174 = product of:
      0.022406347 = sum of:
        0.022406347 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022406347 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Shah, T.A.; Gul, S.; Gaur, R.C.: Authors self-citation behaviour in the field of Library and Information Science (2015) 0.00 
    0.0018671956 = product of:
  0.011203174 = sum of:
    0.011203174 = product of:
      0.022406347 = sum of:
        0.022406347 = weight(_text_:22 in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022406347 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Gossen, T.: Search engines for children : search user interfaces and information-seeking behaviour (2016) 0.00 
    0.0018671956 = product of:
  0.011203174 = sum of:
    0.011203174 = product of:
      0.022406347 = sum of:
        0.022406347 = weight(_text_:22 in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022406347 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  10. Deventer, J.P. van; Kruger, C.J.; Johnson, R.D.: Delineating knowledge management through lexical analysis : a retrospective (2015) 0.00 
    0.0018671956 = product of:
  0.011203174 = sum of:
    0.011203174 = product of:
      0.022406347 = sum of:
        0.022406347 = weight(_text_:22 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022406347 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  11. Kandel, E.R.: Reductionism in art and brain science : bridging the two cultures (2016) 0.00 
    0.0018671956 = product of:
  0.011203174 = sum of:
    0.011203174 = product of:
      0.022406347 = sum of:
        0.022406347 = weight(_text_:22 in 5305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022406347 = score(doc=5305,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5305, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5305)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    14. 6.2019 12:22:37
  12. Sautoy, M. du: What we cannot know (2016) 0.00 
    0.0016004534 = product of:
  0.00960272 = sum of:
    0.00960272 = product of:
      0.01920544 = sum of:
        0.01920544 = weight(_text_:22 in 3034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01920544 = score(doc=3034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3034)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 6.2016 16:08:54
  13. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00 
    0.0016004534 = product of:
  0.00960272 = sum of:
    0.00960272 = product of:
      0.01920544 = sum of:
        0.01920544 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01920544 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.

Authors

Languages

  • d 1668
  • e 728
  • a 2
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1881
  • el 446
  • m 304
  • x 82
  • s 72
  • r 28
  • n 9
  • b 6
  • i 3
  • p 2
  • v 2
  • l 1
  • ms 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications