Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.035155404 = product of:
  0.17577702 = sum of:
    0.17577702 = weight(_text_:index in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17577702 = score(doc=2350,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.94608164 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

I discuss how, given a certain number of articles and citations of these articles, the h-index and the g-index are affected by the level of concentration of the citations. This offers the opportunity for a comparison between these 2 indices from a new perspective.

Object

g-index
h-index

0.030445471 = product of:
  0.15222736 = sum of:
    0.15222736 = weight(_text_:index in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15222736 = score(doc=454,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.8193307 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Object

h-index