Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Campanario, J.M."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. González, L.; Campanario, J.M.: Structure of the impact factor of journals included in the Social Sciences Citation Index : citations from documents labeled "Editorial Material" (2007) 0.04
    0.041938283 = product of:
      0.1048457 = sum of:
        0.09321985 = weight(_text_:index in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09321985 = score(doc=75,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.50173557 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
        0.011625858 = product of:
          0.034877572 = sum of:
            0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034877572 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    We investigated how citations from documents labeled by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) as "editorial material" contribute to the impact factor of academic journals in which they were published. Our analysis is based on records corresponding to the documents classified by the ISI as editorial material published in journals covered by the Social Sciences Citation Index between 1999 and 2003 (50,273 records corresponding to editorial material published in 2,374 journals). The results appear to rule out widespread manipulation of the impact factor by academic journals publishing large amounts of editorial material with many citations to the journal itself as a strategy to increase the impact factor.
    Date
    3. 3.2007 18:29:17
    Object
    Social Sciences Citation Index
  2. Campanario, J.M.: Self-citations that contribute to the journal impact factor : an investment-benefit-yield analysis (2010) 0.01
    0.0107641 = product of:
      0.0538205 = sum of:
        0.0538205 = weight(_text_:index in 4124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0538205 = score(doc=4124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 4124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4124)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The variables investment, benefit, and yield were defined to study the influence of journal self-citations on the impact factor. Investment represents the share of journal self-citations that contribute to the impact factor. Benefit is defined as the ratio of journal impact factor including self-citations to journal impact factor without self-citations. Yield is the relationship between benefit and investment. I selected all journals included in 2008 in the Science Citation Index version of Journal Citation Reports. After deleting 482 records for reasons to be explained, I used a final set of 6,138 journals to study the distribution of the variables defined above. The distribution of benefit differed from the distribution of investment and yield. The top 20-ranked journals were not the same for all three variables. The yield of self-citations on the journal impact factor was, in general, very modest.
  3. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.00
    0.0026882975 = product of:
      0.013441487 = sum of:
        0.013441487 = product of:
          0.04032446 = sum of:
            0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04032446 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
  4. Campanario, J.M.; Acedo, E.: Rejecting highly cited papers : the views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists (2007) 0.00
    0.0023251716 = product of:
      0.011625858 = sum of:
        0.011625858 = product of:
          0.034877572 = sum of:
            0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034877572 = score(doc=273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 4.2007 20:18:05