Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"McIlwaine, I.C."
  1. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A feasibility study on the restructuring of the Universal Decimal Classification into a fully-facetd classification system (1994) 0.09
    0.09113866 = product of:
      0.15189776 = sum of:
        0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 7738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05648775 = score(doc=7738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 7738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7738)
        0.06279058 = weight(_text_:index in 7738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06279058 = score(doc=7738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 7738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7738)
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 7738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=7738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 7738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7738)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    An exploratory and experimental study for the purpose of testing a methodology which might be used to restructure the UDC class by class. The study uses the facet framework established in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd ed., as the basis for the restructuring and the research is being carried out using the discipline 'medical sciences'. A thesaurus will be derived from the restructured scheme which will act as an index to it. In a broader context this research is an attempt to see how far it is possible to take the knowledge base of one classification scheme and impose the structure of another scheme on it
  2. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress in 2004 (2004) 0.03
    0.031668298 = product of:
      0.07917074 = sum of:
        0.055919025 = weight(_text_:system in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055919025 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
        0.023251716 = product of:
          0.069755144 = sum of:
            0.069755144 = weight(_text_:29 in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069755144 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Proposal for the restructuring of UDC class 617.6/.9 - Nervous system. Neurology
    Date
    11. 8.2005 12:29:36
  3. McIlwaine, I.C.: Where have all the flowers gone? : An investigation into the fate of some special classification schemes (2003) 0.02
    0.020367354 = product of:
      0.050918385 = sum of:
        0.032278713 = weight(_text_:context in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032278713 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.18316938 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
        0.018639674 = weight(_text_:system in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018639674 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Prior to the OPAC many institutions devised classifications to suit their special needs. Others expanded or altered general schemes to accommodate specific approaches. A driving force in the creation of these classifications was the Classification Research Group, celebrating its golden jubilee in 2002, whose work created a framework and body of principles that remain valid for the retrieval needs of today. The paper highlights some of these special schemes and highlights the fundamental principles which remain valid. 1. Introduction The distinction between a general and a special classification scheme is made frequently in the textbooks, but is one that it is sometimes difficult to draw. The Library of Congress classification could be described as the special classification par excellence. Normally, however, a special classification is taken to be one that is restricted to a specific subject, and quite often used in one specific context only, either a library or a bibliographic listing or for a specific purpose such as a search engine and it is in this sense that I propose to examine some of these schemes. Today, there is a widespread preference for searching an words as a supplement to the use of a standard system, usually the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). This is enhanced by the ability to search documents full-text in a computerized environment, a situation that did not exist 20 or 30 years ago. Today's situation is a great improvement in many ways, but it does depend upon the words used by the author and the searcher corresponding, and often presupposes the use of English. In libraries, the use of co-operative services and precatalogued records already provided with classification data has also spelt the demise of the special scheme. In many instances, the survival of a special classification depends upon its creaior and, with the passage of time, this becomes inevitably more precarious.
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress in 2003 (2003) 0.02
    0.01937092 = product of:
      0.09685459 = sum of:
        0.09685459 = weight(_text_:system in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09685459 = score(doc=3788,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.72326225 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Contains the proposed table for 617 Cardiovascular System. Nervous System. Glandular System
  5. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995) 0.02
    0.018424368 = product of:
      0.04606092 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
        0.013441487 = product of:
          0.04032446 = sum of:
            0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04032446 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Survey on the activities going to develop the UDC into a fully faceted classification system according to the Recommendations of the UDC Management Board. A Master Reference File (MRF) has been created from which any publisher or insitution may develop its own versions according to the requests of its clientele. The UDC Technical Director at the FID Headquarters in The Hague maintains the file. An Editorial Board and an Editor in Chief was appointed. Extensions and Corrections are being published. Examples are given on ongoing revision work in the classes for Astronomy, Linguistics and Philology as well as in Medicine. Cooperation with the Editors of the Bliss Classification and the DDC exists
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
  6. McIlwaine, I.C.: Some problems of context and terminology (1998) 0.02
    0.018259598 = product of:
      0.09129799 = sum of:
        0.09129799 = weight(_text_:context in 4495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09129799 = score(doc=4495,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.51808125 = fieldWeight in 4495, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4495)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Points out that designers of information systems for subject retrieval aiming at some kind of uinversal usage face the major problem of context, as a word by itself is not meaningful; and inseparable from this problem is that of the terminology used. This problem is most evident in systems that rely totally on words, rather than a systematic structure of some kind
  7. Vickery, B.C.; McIlwaine, I.C.: Structuring and switching: a discussion of the Broad System of Ordering (1979) 0.01
    0.010544192 = product of:
      0.05272096 = sum of:
        0.05272096 = weight(_text_:system in 1866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05272096 = score(doc=1866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1866)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    After a short presentation of major background principles used in BSO construction, the authors consider the most important structural peculiarities and spheres of application of this system. Some specific remarks deal with subdivisions within several major headings. In general, the BSO is viewed as a reasonable and up-to-date structural outline of modern knowledge and a useful tool to interconnect or switch between information systems
  8. McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995) 0.01
    0.010544192 = product of:
      0.05272096 = sum of:
        0.05272096 = weight(_text_:system in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05272096 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Enthält das Ergebnis einer Befragung. 0 hielten das System für sehr gut; 13 für gut; 11 für halbwegs gut; 7 für halbwegs gut; 11 für schlecht. 8,9% der Befragten würden das System übernehmen, 47,5% nicht, 43,6% vielleicht
  9. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2000 (2000) 0.01
    0.005376595 = product of:
      0.026882974 = sum of:
        0.026882974 = product of:
          0.08064892 = sum of:
            0.08064892 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08064892 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75
  10. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The UDC and the World Wide Web (2003) 0.00
    0.0046599186 = product of:
      0.023299592 = sum of:
        0.023299592 = weight(_text_:system in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023299592 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper examines the potentiality of the Universal Decimal Classification as a means for retrieving subjects from the World Wide Web. The analytico-synthetic basis of the scheme provides the facility to link concepts at the input or search stage and to isolate concepts via the notation so as to retrieve the separate parts of a compound subject individually if required. Its notation permits hierarchical searching and overrides the shortcomings of natural language. Recent revisions have been constructed with this purpose in mind, the most recent being for Management. The use of the classification embedded in metadata, as in the GERHARD system or as a basis for subject trees is discussed. Its application as a gazetteer is another Web application to which it is put. The range of up to date editions in many languages and the availability of a Web-based version make its use as a switching language increasingly valuable.
  11. McIlwaine, I.C.; Broughton, V.: ¬The Classification Research Group : then and now (2000) 0.00
    0.003727935 = product of:
      0.018639674 = sum of:
        0.018639674 = weight(_text_:system in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018639674 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The genesis of the Group: In 1948, as part of the post-war renewal of library services in the United Kingdom, the Royal Society organized a Conference on Scientific Information.' What, at the time, must have seemed a minute part of the grand plan, but was later to have a transforming effect on the theory of knowledge organization throughout the remainder of the century, was the setting up of a standing committee of a small group of specialists to investigate the organization and retrieval of scientific information. In 1950, the secretary of that committee, J.D. Bernal, suggested that it might be appropriate to ask a group of librarians to do a study of the problem. After a couple of years of informal discussion it was agreed, in February 1952, to form a Classification Research Group - the CRG as it has become known to subsequent generations. The Group published a brief corporate statement of its views in the Library Association Record in June 1953 and submitted a memorandum to the Library Association Research Committee in May 1955, entitled "The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval". This memorandum was published in the proceedings of what has become known as the "Dorking Conference" in 1957. Of the original fifteen members, four still belong to the Group, three of whom are in regular attendance: Eric Coates, Douglas Foskett and Jack Mills. Brian Vickery ceased attending regularly in the 1960s but has retained his interest in their doings: he was present at the 150th celebratory meeting in 1984 and played an active part in the "Dorking revisited" conference held in 1997. The stated aim of the Group was 'To review the basic principles of bibliographic classification, unhampered by allegiance to any particular published scheme' and it can truly be stated that the work of its members has had a fundamental influence on the teaching and practice of information retrieval. It is paradoxical that this collection of people has exerted such a strong theoretical sway because their aims were from the outset and remain essentially practical. This fact is sometimes overlooked in the literature on knowledge organization: there is a tendency to get carried away, and for researchers of today to concentrate so hard on what might be that they overlook what is needed, useful and practical - the entire objective of any retrieval system.
  12. McIlwaine, I.C.: Africa in the UDC (1994) 0.00
    0.0031002287 = product of:
      0.015501143 = sum of:
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 3120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=3120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3120)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:58:02
  13. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future developments (1994) 0.00
    0.0031002287 = product of:
      0.015501143 = sum of:
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 23(1994) no.5, S.29-33
  14. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: International trends in subject analysis research (1999) 0.00
    0.0031002287 = product of:
      0.015501143 = sum of:
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.23-29
  15. McIlwaine, I.C.: Trends in knowledge organization research (2003) 0.00
    0.0030723398 = product of:
      0.015361699 = sum of:
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 6.2004 19:22:56
  16. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A question of place (2004) 0.00
    0.001937643 = product of:
      0.009688215 = sum of:
        0.009688215 = product of:
          0.029064644 = sum of:
            0.029064644 = weight(_text_:29 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029064644 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 14:17:11
  17. McIlwaine, I.C.: Brian Vickery : 11th September 1918-17 th October 2009 (2010) 0.00
    0.0019202124 = product of:
      0.009601062 = sum of:
        0.009601062 = product of:
          0.028803186 = sum of:
            0.028803186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028803186 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:32:06