Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Smiraglia, R.P."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Smiraglia, R.P.; Lee, H.-L.: Rethinking the authorship principle (2012) 0.02
    0.015834149 = product of:
      0.03958537 = sum of:
        0.027959513 = weight(_text_:system in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027959513 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
        0.011625858 = product of:
          0.034877572 = sum of:
            0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034877572 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The fundamental principle of order in the library catalogue is the authorship principle, which serves as the organizing node of an alphabetico-classed system, in which "texts" of "works" are organized first alphabetically by uniform title of the progenitor work and then are subarranged using titles for variant instantiations, under the heading for an "author." We analyze case studies of entries from (1) the first documented imperial library catalogue, the Seven Epitomes (Qilue [??]), in China; (2) Abelard's Works, which featured prominently in the 1848 testimony of Antonio Panizzi; and (3) The French Chef and the large family of instantiated works associated with it. Our analysis shows that the catalogue typically contains many large superwork sets. A more pragmatic approach to the design of catalogues is to array descriptions of resources in relation to the superwork sets to which they might belong. In all cases, a multidimensional faceted arrangement incorporating ideational nodes from the universe of recorded knowledge holds promise for greatly enhanced retrieval capability.
    Date
    10.12.2019 19:29:36
  2. Smiraglia, R.P.; Leazer, G.H.: Derivative bibliographic relationships : the work relationship in a global bibliographic database (1999) 0.01
    0.008069678 = product of:
      0.040348392 = sum of:
        0.040348392 = weight(_text_:context in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040348392 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.22896172 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    To contribute to the development of a sophisticated control of bibliographic works research must be build on the growing understanding of the nature of the work and the constitution of bibliographic families. The present study was designed to address the following in the context of a global bibliographic database: OCLC's WorldCat: the proportion of works that are members of bibliographic families; the size of each family; bibliographic characteristics that can be associated with the existence or extent of derivative bibliographic relationships; the frequency with which each type of relationship appears; and the complexity of bibliographic families. A sample of bibliographic families was constructed. Results indicate that a core of works of similar character constitute the bibliographic population of American academic and research libraries (OCLC members). It seems that the canon of derivative works is greater in the academic sphere than in the bibliographic universe represented by OCLC at large. The size of a bibliographic family seems to be related to its popularity or its canonicity. Discipline, form, and genre all fail to demonstrate any influence on derivation of works. Further study of specific segments of the bibliographic universe, for instance the literature of particular disciplines, is clearly called for. The purpose of this research is to contribute to the development of a sophisticated control of bibliographic works and families. In particular, this research is designed to build on our growing understanding of the nature of the work and the constitution of bibliographic families
  3. Smiraglia, R.P.: Be careful what you wish for : lacunae in the FRBR family of models (2012) 0.01
    0.006523886 = product of:
      0.03261943 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 1907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=1907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1907)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The library catalog as a catalog of works was an infectious idea, which together with research led to reconceptualization in the form of the FRBR conceptual model. Two categories of lacunae emerge-the expression entity, and gaps in the model such as aggregates and dynamic documents. Evidence needed to extend the FRBR model is available in contemporary research on instantiation. The challenge for the bibliographic community is to begin to think of FRBR as a form of knowledge organization system, adding a final dimension to classification. The papers in the present volume offer a compendium of the promise of the FRBR model.
  4. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The nature of "a work" : implications for the organization of knowledge (2001) 0.00
    0.004650343 = product of:
      0.023251716 = sum of:
        0.023251716 = product of:
          0.069755144 = sum of:
            0.069755144 = weight(_text_:29 in 5983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069755144 = score(doc=5983,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5983, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5983)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 29(2002) no.2, S.107-109 (G. Campbell)
  5. Smiraglia, R.P.: Rethinking what we catalog : documents as cultural artifacts (2008) 0.00
    0.001937643 = product of:
      0.009688215 = sum of:
        0.009688215 = product of:
          0.029064644 = sum of:
            0.029064644 = weight(_text_:29 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029064644 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2008 14:59:03

Authors

Types