-
Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein allgemeiner Bibliotheksindex (1998)
0.08
0.08078624 = product of:
0.2019656 = sum of:
0.15536642 = weight(_text_:index in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15536642 = score(doc=1736,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.836226 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
0.046599183 = weight(_text_:system in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046599183 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A general library index, produced as a series over years, would describe performance in the whole national system, showing increases and decreases compared with previous years. The index should cover input, processing and output and be modelled on the consumer price index. This will reflect service quality and quantity and users' reactions
-
Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010)
0.03
0.03469106 = product of:
0.08672766 = sum of:
0.06342807 = weight(_text_:index in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06342807 = score(doc=865,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
0.023299592 = weight(_text_:system in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023299592 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Many Web 2.0 services (including Library 2.0 catalogs) make use of folksonomies. The purpose of this paper is to cut off all tags in the long tail of a document-specific tag distribution. The remaining tags at the beginning of a tag distribution are considered power tags and form a new, additional search option in information retrieval systems. Design/methodology/approach - In a theoretical approach the paper discusses document-specific tag distributions (power law and inverse-logistic shape), the development of such distributions (Yule-Simon process and shuffling theory) and introduces search tags (besides the well-known index tags) as a possibility for generating tag distributions. Findings - Search tags are compatible with broad and narrow folksonomies and with all knowledge organization systems (e.g. classification systems and thesauri), while index tags are only applicable in broad folksonomies. Based on these findings, the paper presents a sketch of an algorithm for mining and processing power tags in information retrieval systems. Research limitations/implications - This conceptual approach is in need of empirical evaluation in a concrete retrieval system. Practical implications - Power tags are a new search option for retrieval systems to limit the amount of hits. Originality/value - The paper introduces power tags as a means for enhancing the precision of search results in information retrieval systems that apply folksonomies, e.g. catalogs in Library 2.0environments.
-
Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein Netz wissenschaftlicher Informationen : gesponnen aus Fußnoten (1999)
0.02
0.01864397 = product of:
0.09321985 = sum of:
0.09321985 = weight(_text_:index in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09321985 = score(doc=3890,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.50173557 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Object
- Science Citation Index
Social Sciences Citation Index
Arts and Humanities Citation Index
-
Stock, W.G.: Journal Citation Reports : Ein Impact Factor für Bibliotheken, Verlage und Autoren? (2001)
0.01
0.008970084 = product of:
0.044850416 = sum of:
0.044850416 = weight(_text_:index in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044850416 = score(doc=5915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Gibt es objektive Kriterien für die Bestellung und Abbestellung wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften? Wie lange sollte eine Bibliothek Periodikabestände benutzernah aufstellen? Kann ein Verlag -außer via Verkaufszahlen - auf Kriterien des Erfolgs seiner Zeitschriften zurückgreifen? Hat ein Autor eine Entscheidungsgrundlage, welcher Zeitschrift er seinen Artikel anbietet? Ist die Forschungsaktivität eines Instituts oder eines Wissenschaftlers über den Impact derjenigen Zeitschriftentitel zu evaluieren, die die Forschungsergebnisse drucken? Können die 'Journal Citation Reports (JCR) "des "Institute for Scientific Information" bei der Klärung solcher Fragen helfen? Sind die JCR ein nützliches oder gar ein notwendiges Hilfsmittel für Bibliotheken, für Verlage, für Wissenschaftsmanager und für wissenschaftliche Autoren? Die 'Journal Citation Reports" geben im Jahresrhythmus informetrische Kennzahlen wie die Zitationsrate, den Impact Factor, den Immediacy Index, die Halbwertszeit für eine Auswahl wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften an. Zusätzlich berichten sie darüber, weiche Zeitschriften weiche anderen Zeitschriften zitieren bzw. von diesen zitiert werden, so dass "Soziogramme" wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenkommunikation entstehen. Wir wollen am Beispiel des aktuellen Jahrgangs ( 1999) die JCR detailliert beschreiben, die Auswahlkriterien der Zeitschriften beleuchten, die verwendeten informetrischen Kennwerte - vor allem den Impact Factor - kritisch hinterfragen, um danach die Einsatzgebiete bei Bibliotheken, in der Wissenschaftsevaluation, bei Verlagen und bei Autoren zu diskutieren. Das Fazit sei vorweggenommen: Die JCR sind ein nicht umgehbares Hilfsmittel für die fokussierten Anwendungsbereiche. Sie sind mitnichten frei von Problemen. Wir schließen daher mit einigen Verbesserungsvorschlägen
-
Knautz, K.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in videos (2011)
0.01
0.008970084 = product of:
0.044850416 = sum of:
0.044850416 = weight(_text_:index in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044850416 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The object of this empirical research study is emotion, as depicted and aroused in videos. This paper seeks to answer the questions: Are users able to index such emotions consistently? Are the users' votes usable for emotional video retrieval? Design/methodology/approach - The authors worked with a controlled vocabulary for nine basic emotions (love, happiness, fun, surprise, desire, sadness, anger, disgust and fear), a slide control for adjusting the emotions' intensity, and the approach of broad folksonomies. Different users tagged the same videos. The test persons had the task of indexing the emotions of 20 videos (reprocessed clips from YouTube). The authors distinguished between emotions which were depicted in the video and those that were evoked in the user. Data were received from 776 participants and a total of 279,360 slide control values were analyzed. Findings - The consistency of the users' votes is very high; the tag distributions for the particular videos' emotions are stable. The final shape of the distributions will be reached by the tagging activities of only very few users (less than 100). By applying the approach of power tags it is possible to separate the pivotal emotions of every document - if indeed there is any feeling at all. Originality/value - This paper is one of the first steps in the new research area of emotional information retrieval (EmIR). To the authors' knowledge, it is the first research project into the collective indexing of emotions in videos.
-
Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006)
0.01
0.008335916 = product of:
0.04167958 = sum of:
0.04167958 = weight(_text_:system in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04167958 = score(doc=76,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.31124252 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Intellectual property information : A comparative analysis of main information providers (2006)
0.01
0.007908144 = product of:
0.03954072 = sum of:
0.03954072 = weight(_text_:system in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03954072 = score(doc=210,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office, Questel-Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including Markush search), patent family references and citations search, biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking, mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering the results of information science research, the practice of patent information shows unexhausted improvement opportunities (e.g., the application of bibliographic patent coupling and co-patent-citation for mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet).
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Klassifikation und terminologische Kontrolle : Yahoo!, Open Directory und Oingo im Vergleich (2000)
0.01
0.00745587 = product of:
0.03727935 = sum of:
0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 5496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03727935 = score(doc=5496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5496)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In Password 11/2000 wurden durch einen Retrievaltest die qualitativ führenden Suchwerkzeuge im Internet bestimmt. In den nächsten Teilen unseres State of the Art - Berichts über Retrievalsysteme im World Wide Weh beschreiben wir einzelne interessante Ansätze der Technik der TopSuchwerkzeuge. Den Anfang machen die klassifikatorischen Verzeichnisse Yahoo! und das Open Directory-Projekt sowie das System Oingo, das im Rahmen eines "semantischen Retrievals" das Homonym- und Synonymproblem angeht
-
Schloegl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Impact and relevance of LIS journals : a scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals - Citation analysis versus reader survey (2004)
0.01
0.0071760663 = product of:
0.03588033 = sum of:
0.03588033 = weight(_text_:index in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03588033 = score(doc=5249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.1931181 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The goal of the scientometric analysis presented in this article was to investigate international and regional (i.e., German-language) periodicals in the field of library and information science (LIS). This was done by means of a citation analysis and a reader survey. For the citation analysis, impact factor, citing half-life, number of references per article, and the rate of self-references of a periodical were used as indicators. In addition, the leading LIS periodicals were mapped. For the 40 international periodicals, data were collected from ISI's Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports (JCR); the citations of the 10 German-language journals were counted manually (overall 1,494 source articles with 10,520 citations). Altogether, the empirical base of the citation analysis consisted of nearly 90,000 citations in 6,203 source articles that were published between 1997 and 2000. The expert survey investigated reading frequency, applicability of the journals to the job of the reader, publication frequency, and publication preference both for all respondents and for different groups among them (practitioners vs. scientists, librarians vs. documentalists vs. LIS scholars, public sector vs. information industry vs. other private company employees). The study was conducted in spring 2002. A total of 257 questionnaires were returned by information specialists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Having both citation and readership data, we performed a comparative analysis of these two data sets. This enabled us to identify answers to questions like: Does reading behavior correlate with the journal impact factor? Do readers prefer journals with a short or a long half-life, or with a low or a high number of references? Is there any difference in this matter among librarians, documentalists, and LIS scholars?
-
Stock, W.G.: Management interner und externer Informationsressourcen in einem einheitlichen Groupware-System : Information Center von AGI - Information Management Consultants (1999)
0.01
0.006523886 = product of:
0.03261943 = sum of:
0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 3396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03261943 = score(doc=3396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 3396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3396)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Stock, W.G.: Verkaufte Suchwörter, verkaufte Links : Retrieval nach Homepages optimiert? (1999)
0.01
0.006523886 = product of:
0.03261943 = sum of:
0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03261943 = score(doc=4142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Selten wurde ein Dienst so stark diskutiert wie 'RealNames', da sowohl seine Suchwörter als auch die darauf aufsetzenden Links auf Homepages verkauft werden. Machen wir uns doch nichts vor: Das WWW ist ein kommerzielles Unternehmen, die Dienstleistungen müssen finanziert werden. Und warum soll nicht ein Privatunternehmen mit Inhaltserschließung Gewinne erzielen? RealNames mit seinem 'Internet Keyword System' ist eine interessante Idee, das Retrieval nach Homepages zielgenau durchzuführen. Was bringt RealNames den Nutzern? Wann sollte jemand, der Sites im WWW unterhält, Suchwörter und Links bei RealNames abonnieren (und was kostet das)? Im Oktober 1999 haben wir RealNames genauer angeschaut. Analysiert wurde das gezielte Retrieval nach Homepages bei AltaVista, Fireball und bei RealNames.com
-
Gremm, J.; Barth, J.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.; Stock, W.G.: Transitioning towards knowledge society : Qatar as a case study (2018)
0.01
0.006523886 = product of:
0.03261943 = sum of:
0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 4251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03261943 = score(doc=4251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4251)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The book offers a critical evaluation of Qatar's path from oil- and gas-based industries to a knowledge-based economy. This book gives basic information about the region and the country, including the geographic and demographic data, the culture, the politics and the economy, the health care conditions and the education system. It introduces the concepts of knowledge society and knowledge-based development and adds factual details about Qatar by interpreting indicators of the development status.
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980)
0.01
0.0061446796 = product of:
0.030723399 = sum of:
0.030723399 = product of:
0.092170194 = sum of:
0.092170194 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092170194 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
-
Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995)
0.01
0.0061446796 = product of:
0.030723399 = sum of:
0.030723399 = product of:
0.092170194 = sum of:
0.092170194 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092170194 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004)
0.01
0.0061446796 = product of:
0.030723399 = sum of:
0.030723399 = product of:
0.092170194 = sum of:
0.092170194 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092170194 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 27.11.2005 18:04:22
-
Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998)
0.01
0.005376595 = product of:
0.026882974 = sum of:
0.026882974 = product of:
0.08064892 = sum of:
0.08064892 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08064892 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.00
0.0038404248 = product of:
0.019202124 = sum of:
0.019202124 = product of:
0.057606373 = sum of:
0.057606373 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057606373 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Informationsmarkt : Informationen im I-Commerce anbieten und nachfragen (2011)
0.00
0.0030723398 = product of:
0.015361699 = sum of:
0.015361699 = product of:
0.046085097 = sum of:
0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046085097 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 23. 9.2010 11:15:22
-
Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002)
0.00
0.0027127003 = product of:
0.013563501 = sum of:
0.013563501 = product of:
0.0406905 = sum of:
0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0406905 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 23. 8.2002 11:51:29
-
Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014)
0.00
0.0026882975 = product of:
0.013441487 = sum of:
0.013441487 = product of:
0.04032446 = sum of:
0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04032446 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 18:56:46
