Search (115 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × language_ss:"f"
  1. Lavallee, C.: Indexation manuelle et indexation assistee par ordinateur : comparison de la performance de deux index d'une monographie (1996) 0.08
    0.07554022 = product of:
      0.18885055 = sum of:
        0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064557426 = score(doc=740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
        0.12429313 = weight(_text_:index in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12429313 = score(doc=740,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.6689808 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an experiment, conducted in Mar 95 in the context of a course at the School of Library and Information Science at the University of Montreal, which evaluates the information retrieval capabilities of a manual index and a semi automated index developed according to the Bennion method. The application of a formula developed by Bennion shows that the indexes are almost identical
  2. Bouchon, C.: ¬Le classement méthodique de la collection des gravures et de photographies de la Bibliothèque des arts décoratifs (1997) 0.07
    0.07464103 = product of:
      0.1244017 = sum of:
        0.07176066 = weight(_text_:index in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07176066 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03727935 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes Jules Maciet's collection in the Bibliothèque des arts décoratifs, one of Paris's most accessible specialist art libraries, which offers the researcher an eclectic range of visual materials inclusing rare prints and photographs. It is an exhaustive collection still classified today according to the original system. An index of engravers, publishers and printsellers, and sources serves artists, researchers and other users
    Source
    Art libraries journal. 22(1997) no.3, S.33-38
  3. Classification décimale de Dewey : établis par Melvil Dewey. Vol.1: Introduction, Tables auxiliaries. - Vol.2: Tables générale 000-599. - Vol.3: Tables générale 600-999. - Index, Guide (1998) 0.05
    0.052357085 = product of:
      0.13089271 = sum of:
        0.107641 = weight(_text_:index in 3479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.107641 = score(doc=3479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 3479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3479)
        0.023251716 = product of:
          0.069755144 = sum of:
            0.069755144 = weight(_text_:29 in 3479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069755144 = score(doc=3479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3479)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    30. 4.1999 9:29:10
  4. Classification décimale de Dewey et Index : Première version francaise intégrale d'après la 18e édition par le Groupe Lyonnais de classification, France, et la Bibliothèque du Collège de Sainte-Anne-de-la Pocatière, Canada (1974) 0.05
    0.052357085 = product of:
      0.13089271 = sum of:
        0.107641 = weight(_text_:index in 3486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.107641 = score(doc=3486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 3486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3486)
        0.023251716 = product of:
          0.069755144 = sum of:
            0.069755144 = weight(_text_:29 in 3486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069755144 = score(doc=3486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3486)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    30. 4.1999 9:29:10
  5. Classification décimale de Dewey et Index (1994) 0.05
    0.052357085 = product of:
      0.13089271 = sum of:
        0.107641 = weight(_text_:index in 3488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.107641 = score(doc=3488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 3488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3488)
        0.023251716 = product of:
          0.069755144 = sum of:
            0.069755144 = weight(_text_:29 in 3488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069755144 = score(doc=3488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3488)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    30. 4.1999 9:29:10
  6. Lardy, J.-P.: ¬Les outils de recherche d'information sur Internet : guides, listes thematiques et index (1996) 0.05
    0.05227342 = product of:
      0.13068354 = sum of:
        0.107641 = weight(_text_:index in 4734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.107641 = score(doc=4734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 4734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4734)
        0.023042548 = product of:
          0.06912764 = sum of:
            0.06912764 = weight(_text_:22 in 4734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912764 = score(doc=4734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4734)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  7. Borgne, L.I.: INTERNET: vers la bibliothèque virtuel? (1993) 0.05
    0.049502518 = product of:
      0.12375629 = sum of:
        0.046599183 = weight(_text_:system in 7333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046599183 = score(doc=7333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 7333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7333)
        0.07715711 = product of:
          0.115735665 = sum of:
            0.05812929 = weight(_text_:29 in 7333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05812929 = score(doc=7333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 7333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7333)
            0.057606373 = weight(_text_:22 in 7333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057606373 = score(doc=7333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7333)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Defines a virtual library as an environment where information on paper is transferred to magnetic or optical media accessible direct by means of terminals and distributed via networks. Describes such a telecommunication system, the Internet, its capabilities, services offered and principle problems. provides examples of the different INTERNET applications
    Source
    Argus. 22(1993) no.2, S.21-29
  8. Lupovici, C.: ¬Le digital object identifier : le système du DOI (1998) 0.05
    0.048657514 = product of:
      0.12164378 = sum of:
        0.056498513 = weight(_text_:system in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056498513 = score(doc=2747,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
        0.06514527 = product of:
          0.097717896 = sum of:
            0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0406905 = score(doc=2747,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
            0.0570274 = weight(_text_:22 in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0570274 = score(doc=2747,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Digital Object Identifier (DOI) has been developed by the academic technical and medical publishing sectors to enable the management of access rights to information published electronically. The DOI system has evolved from the physical documentary unit identifiers developed in the 1970, physical and document logical unit identifiers developed in the 1980s and recently modified to meet the needs of electronic distribution. This experience is integrated into the standardization, currently in progress on the Internet network, of the identification of resources and their localization. The DOI system is potentially the object of an international standard as the ISBN and the ISSN have been
    Date
    22. 1.1999 19:29:22
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The digital Object Identifier: the DOI system
  9. Regimbeau, G.: Acces thématiques aux oeuvres d'art contemporaines dans les banques de données (1998) 0.05
    0.046738643 = product of:
      0.116846606 = sum of:
        0.10148491 = weight(_text_:index in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10148491 = score(doc=2237,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the possibilities and difficulties encountered when using a thematic index to search contemporary art databanks. Jaconde and Videomuseum, 2 French databanks, are used as examples. the core problems found in the study are the methods and limits of indexing in both systems. A thematic index should be developed that is better adapted to 20th century art, based on the complementary and reciprocal relationship between text and image, and which fully exploits hypertext
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. Classification décimale universelle (2004) 0.04
    0.043630905 = product of:
      0.10907726 = sum of:
        0.08970083 = weight(_text_:index in 3708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08970083 = score(doc=3708,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 3708, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3708)
        0.01937643 = product of:
          0.05812929 = sum of:
            0.05812929 = weight(_text_:29 in 3708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05812929 = score(doc=3708,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3708, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3708)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Vol. I: Tables auxiliaire ; Classes 0 à 5; Vol. II: Classes 6 à 9; Vol. III: Index
    Date
    7. 8.2005 15:34:29
  11. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.03
    0.03196765 = product of:
      0.07991912 = sum of:
        0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064557426 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    TREC ia an annual conference held in the USA devoted to electronic systems for large full text information searching. The conference deals with evaluation and comparison techniques developed since 1992 by participants from the research and industrial fields. The work of the conference is destined for designers (rather than users) of systems which access full text information. Describes the context, objectives, organization, evaluation methods and limits of TREC
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  12. Guilbaud, E.: Comment indexer l'image fixe? (1995) 0.03
    0.028704265 = product of:
      0.14352132 = sum of:
        0.14352132 = weight(_text_:index in 6847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14352132 = score(doc=6847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 6847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6847)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: How to index a picture?
  13. Turquet, B.: Que faire de Rameau? : Ou comment faire avec Rameau? (1997) 0.03
    0.028020501 = product of:
      0.07005125 = sum of:
        0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05648775 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
        0.013563501 = product of:
          0.0406905 = sum of:
            0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0406905 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Contribution to the ongoing debate on the French subject headings list RAMEAU, which has been much criticised as time consuming and inflexible. Proposed technical solutions to recurring problems with complex syntax, strucutre of hierarchical and associative links, and rigity of language are discussed, in the context of computerised cataloguing and retrieval using OPACs. As a universal indexing language RAMEAU is more appropriate for medium sized specialised libraries and specialist researchers. However the 2 possible subject indexing techniques, linguistic treatment of whole text and thesaurus, are now beginning to be viewed as complementary approaches
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  14. Hannech, A.: Système de recherche d'information étendue basé sur une projection multi-espaces (2018) 0.03
    0.025593145 = product of:
      0.04265524 = sum of:
        0.017940165 = weight(_text_:index in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017940165 = score(doc=4472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.09655905 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
        0.02083979 = weight(_text_:system in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02083979 = score(doc=4472,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.15562126 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
        0.0038752859 = product of:
          0.011625857 = sum of:
            0.011625857 = weight(_text_:29 in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011625857 = score(doc=4472,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Since its appearance in the early 90's, the World Wide Web (WWW or Web) has provided universal access to knowledge and the world of information has been primarily witness to a great revolution (the digital revolution). It quickly became very popular, making it the largest and most comprehensive database and knowledge base thanks to the amount and diversity of data it contains. However, the considerable increase and evolution of these data raises important problems for users, in particular for accessing the documents most relevant to their search queries. In order to cope with this exponential explosion of data volume and facilitate their access by users, various models are offered by information retrieval systems (IRS) for the representation and retrieval of web documents. Traditional SRIs use simple keywords that are not semantically linked to index and retrieve these documents. This creates limitations in terms of the relevance and ease of exploration of results. To overcome these limitations, existing techniques enrich documents by integrating external keywords from different sources. However, these systems still suffer from limitations that are related to the exploitation techniques of these sources of enrichment. When the different sources are used so that they cannot be distinguished by the system, this limits the flexibility of the exploration models that can be applied to the results returned by this system. Users then feel lost to these results, and find themselves forced to filter them manually to select the relevant information. If they want to go further, they must reformulate and target their search queries even more until they reach the documents that best meet their expectations. In this way, even if the systems manage to find more relevant results, their presentation remains problematic. In order to target research to more user-specific information needs and improve the relevance and exploration of its research findings, advanced SRIs adopt different data personalization techniques that assume that current research of user is directly related to his profile and / or previous browsing / search experiences.
    However, this assumption does not hold in all cases, the needs of the user evolve over time and can move away from his previous interests stored in his profile. In other cases, the user's profile may be misused to extract or infer new information needs. This problem is much more accentuated with ambiguous queries. When multiple POIs linked to a search query are identified in the user's profile, the system is unable to select the relevant data from that profile to respond to that request. This has a direct impact on the quality of the results provided to this user. In order to overcome some of these limitations, in this research thesis, we have been interested in the development of techniques aimed mainly at improving the relevance of the results of current SRIs and facilitating the exploration of major collections of documents. To do this, we propose a solution based on a new concept and model of indexing and information retrieval called multi-spaces projection. This proposal is based on the exploitation of different categories of semantic and social information that enrich the universe of document representation and search queries in several dimensions of interpretations. The originality of this representation is to be able to distinguish between the different interpretations used for the description and the search for documents. This gives a better visibility on the results returned and helps to provide a greater flexibility of search and exploration, giving the user the ability to navigate one or more views of data that interest him the most. In addition, the proposed multidimensional representation universes for document description and search query interpretation help to improve the relevance of the user's results by providing a diversity of research / exploration that helps meet his diverse needs and those of other different users. This study exploits different aspects that are related to the personalized search and aims to solve the problems caused by the evolution of the information needs of the user. Thus, when the profile of this user is used by our system, a technique is proposed and used to identify the interests most representative of his current needs in his profile. This technique is based on the combination of three influential factors, including the contextual, frequency and temporal factor of the data. The ability of users to interact, exchange ideas and opinions, and form social networks on the Web, has led systems to focus on the types of interactions these users have at the level of interaction between them as well as their social roles in the system. This social information is discussed and integrated into this research work. The impact and how they are integrated into the IR process are studied to improve the relevance of the results.
    Date
    29. 9.2018 18:57:38
  15. Pelou, P.: ¬La relation bibliothecaire usager dans le reseau des bibliotheques internationales (1996) 0.02
    0.024017572 = product of:
      0.06004393 = sum of:
        0.04841807 = weight(_text_:context in 6378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04841807 = score(doc=6378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27475408 = fieldWeight in 6378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6378)
        0.011625858 = product of:
          0.034877572 = sum of:
            0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 6378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034877572 = score(doc=6378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 6378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6378)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Users of international libraries, such as the UN library in Geneva, are themselves highly skilled in using electronic information sources and expect to have access to the most up to date equipment. The librarian/user relationship is thus cooperative, with the user often more expert in using new tools than the librarian. There is no formal network of international libraries, which stand outside overall information policies, though libraries such as those of the UN coordinate standards and activities. The role of the librarian in this context, as exemplified by the Genova library, embraces 3 functions: producer (creation of databases and bibliographies eg those of the Department of Human Rights); trainer (continuing education for both colleagues and users); and mediator (making information and documentation available to the public eg CD-ROM and video publications of archive material celebrating the UN's 50th anniversary). With increasing use of the Internet and the personalisation of information, the library is becoming more like a cafe, offering an information space for individualistic users
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  16. Duchemin, P.-Y.: BN-OPALINE (1997) 0.02
    0.021112198 = product of:
      0.052780494 = sum of:
        0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03727935 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The National Library of France (BNF) database, BN-OPALINE, initially developed for computerising the specialised departments' catalogues, has functioned since 1996 as the database for all BNF documents. Accessible on the Internet, notices are in INTERMARC format, with over 500.000 references covering specialised documents, microforms and documents acquired by partner libraries. Eventually BNF-OPALINE will be integrated into the future BNF multimedia information system and form part of the French joint catalogue
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  17. Menillet, D.: Grilles d'indexation et de préindexation : l'exemple de PASCAL (1992) 0.02
    0.018473173 = product of:
      0.04618293 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 5806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=5806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5806)
        0.013563501 = product of:
          0.0406905 = sum of:
            0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 5806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0406905 = score(doc=5806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5806)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Coherence and precision in indexing definitely determines the degree of efficacy of an information system. With this in mind, as well as the long-term plan to develop systems for computer-assisted indexing, the Scientific and Technical Information Institute (INIST) is studying the processes of indexing and developing information languages. Describes some tools developed by INIST for use by indexers of its PASCAL data bank. Using a model of the various steps involved, INIST first created indexing tables by broad subject area that make it possible to identify the concepts treated in the documents. For each area, pre-indexing tables were then prepared in which the relevant terms are presented in an organized and structured manner so that they can be transcribed into the appropriate information language. These tables should be a fundamental step in knowledge base development
    Source
    Documentaliste. 29(1992) no.4/5, S.183-190
  18. Vigue-Camus, A.: Des usagers et des écrans à la Bibliothèque Publique d'Informations (1996) 0.02
    0.018473173 = product of:
      0.04618293 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 5724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=5724,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5724, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5724)
        0.013563501 = product of:
          0.0406905 = sum of:
            0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 5724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0406905 = score(doc=5724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5724)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Account of a limited experimental study at the Bibliothèque Publique d'Informations (BPI), the Paris multimedia public library, to establish a methodology for investigating user interactions with new technology. A wide range of materials are available at the BPI, including CD-ROMs and the Internet. Preliminary observations indicate that users do not follow the pattern dictated by the machine, but take approaches based on their own experience and skills. Setbacks are generally interpreted as defects in the software, not personla failure to master the system. Large scale qualitative abservation, using research methods from the social sciences, would establish a knowledge base for developing user skills to exploit multimedia resources more fully
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  19. Passin-Aguirre, N.; Leresche, F.: ¬Le format INTERMARC integre : futur format de travail de la BNF (1997) 0.02
    0.018473173 = product of:
      0.04618293 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
        0.013563501 = product of:
          0.0406905 = sum of:
            0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0406905 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The French National Library (NBF) has developed 2 new versions of INTERMARC, (A) and (B), to standardise cataloguing procedures and enrich bibliographic description and access. The bibliographic description format (B) accords with existing ISBD and can be used for all types of documents, allowing inclusion of specific characteristics and addition of new links. The format for editing records (A) eliminates redundancies and enriches links between fields. Both will be used as reference formats in the new Information System
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  20. Provansal, A.: Neuf mois après (1997) 0.02
    0.018473173 = product of:
      0.04618293 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
        0.013563501 = product of:
          0.0406905 = sum of:
            0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0406905 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic documents are creating new services and generating new demands, with consequent impacts on the means of transmitting knowledge, international standards and democratisation of access. Universal bibliographic control depends on common rules for bibliographic description and format to ensure compatibility and exchange. In addition to ISBN and UNIMARC for cataloguing, Z39.50 allows searching of heterogeneous databases and SGML makes cataloguing in publication a reality. Such developments must be based on knowledge of what users want and their real search and consultation practices, not what the system devisers have the technology to create
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24

Authors

Types

  • a 107
  • m 6
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…