-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.10
0.09813748 = product of:
0.16356246 = sum of:
0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064557426 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03727935 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.061725687 = product of:
0.09258853 = sum of:
0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04650343 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046085097 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:21:29
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Dumontet, C.: Cataloghi a strisce (1995)
0.07
0.07040275 = product of:
0.11733791 = sum of:
0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064557426 = score(doc=4425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03727935 = score(doc=4425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
0.015501143 = product of:
0.04650343 = sum of:
0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04650343 = score(doc=4425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Analyses some problems that arise when cataloguing comic book/strip cartoon publications using the USMARC format, suggesting solutions for each of the 4 main forms in which cartoon titles appear - periodical titles; stories within periodicals and serials; serial titles; and albums - in the context of AACR2 interpretations. For genre cataloguing, terminology from an 'open' system such as the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) is preferable to the LCSH. Suggests ways to overcome USMARC's limitations when cataloguing cartoon characters
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 17:18:10
-
Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004)
0.05
0.05273932 = product of:
0.08789886 = sum of:
0.04841807 = weight(_text_:context in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04841807 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27475408 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.027959513 = weight(_text_:system in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027959513 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.011521274 = product of:
0.03456382 = sum of:
0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456382 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Languages of the world : cataloguing issues and problems (1993)
0.05
0.05227342 = product of:
0.13068354 = sum of:
0.107641 = weight(_text_:index in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107641 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
0.023042548 = product of:
0.06912764 = sum of:
0.06912764 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06912764 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 15. 6.1996 18:06:22
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Catalogue & index. 1995, no.117, S.12,16 (G. Muirhead)
-
Cree, J.S.: Data conversion and migration at the libraries of the Home Office and the Department of the Environment (1997)
0.05
0.048471745 = product of:
0.12117936 = sum of:
0.09321985 = weight(_text_:index in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09321985 = score(doc=2175,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.50173557 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
0.027959513 = weight(_text_:system in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027959513 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Describes the experience of data conversion and migration at the libraries of the Home Office (HO) and the Dept. of the Environment (DoE), UK. Both HO and DoE libraries had changed from Anglo-American code cataloguing to AACR2 cataloguing in the mid-1970s. Both libraries were selective in identifying records for conversion initially to BLAISE-LOCAS. Conversion to integrated library systems from BLAISE-LOCAS MARC tapes produced problems in both libraries with location/holdings fields which were largely resolved at HO, but not resolved at DoE. HO experienced problems converting to a system with fixed field lengths. HO converted subject keywords to form a rudimentary, non-standard thesaurus which required the addition of Broader Term and Narrower Term to meet the challenge of computerized searching. DoE converted a non-thesaurus subject index to an authority file, but continued to maintain the index on a stand-alone DataEase application for use by cataloguers. Neither library converted acquisitions data
- Source
- Catalogue and index. 1997, no.124, S.1-5
-
Botero, C.; Thorburn, C.; Williams, N.: Series in an online integrated system : an option beyond the MARC authority record (1990)
0.04
0.040056325 = product of:
0.10014081 = sum of:
0.04613084 = weight(_text_:system in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04613084 = score(doc=482,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.054009974 = product of:
0.08101496 = sum of:
0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0406905 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04032446 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:29:22
-
Chang, H.-Y.: Cataloguing electronic resources (1997)
0.04
0.039602015 = product of:
0.099005036 = sum of:
0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03727935 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.061725687 = product of:
0.09258853 = sum of:
0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04650343 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046085097 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Considers issues surrounding cataloguing electronic resources on the MELVYL online system at the University of California, USA. Considers implications of the differences between online and paper versions of serials, difficulties in providing precises information on holdings of full text articles, cataloguing rules changes that are need to integrate MARC formats, adding URLs as a subfield, archiving electronic journals and restricting access to electronic materials
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 12:21:39
- Source
- DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24
-
Leazer, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographic relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog : an examination of serials (1996)
0.04
0.035642873 = product of:
0.089107186 = sum of:
0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05648775 = score(doc=5579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03261943 = score(doc=5579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Evaluates current research into bibliographic relationships sparked off by B.B. Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (LRTS 35(1991) no.4, S.393-405) and R.P. Smiraglia's taxonomy of the derivative bibliographic relationship (PhD dissertation, Chicago Univ., Graduate Library School, 1992). These researches provide the context for a discussion of recent research and standards work. Reevaluates research on the sequential relationship drawn from work conducted on periodicals and the implications of that research is applied to cataloguing system design. Evaluates the conceptual designs proposed by researchers such as G.H. Leazer and M. Gorman's and uses them in a critique of the USMARC format for bibliographic description
-
Zuccala, A.; Breum, M.; Bruun, K.; Wunsch, B.T.: Metric assessments of books as families of works (2018)
0.03
0.03469106 = product of:
0.08672766 = sum of:
0.06342807 = weight(_text_:index in 4018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06342807 = score(doc=4018,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 4018, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4018)
0.023299592 = weight(_text_:system in 4018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023299592 = score(doc=4018,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 4018, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4018)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We describe the intellectual and physical properties of books as manifestations, expressions, and works and assess the current indexing and metadata structure of monographs in the Book Citation Index (BKCI). Our focus is on the interrelationship of these properties in light of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Data pertaining to monographs were collected from the Danish PURE repository system as well as the BKCI (2005-2015) via their International Standard Book Numbers (ISBNs). Each ISBN was then matched to the same ISBN and family-related ISBNs cataloged in two additional databases: OCLC-WorldCat and Goodreads. With the retrieval of all family-related ISBNs, we were able to determine the number of monograph expressions present in the BKCI and their collective relationship to one work. Our results show that the majority of missing expressions from the BKCI are emblematic (i.e., first editions of monographs) and that both the indexing and metadata structure of this commercial database could significantly improve with the introduction of distinct expression IDs (i.e., for every distinct edition) and unifying work-related IDs. This improved metadata structure would support the collection of more accurate publication and citation counts for monographs and has implications for developing new indicators based on bibliographic levels.
- Object
- Book Citation Index
-
Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model : FRBR and the bibliographic universe (2006)
0.03
0.031997908 = product of:
0.07999477 = sum of:
0.068473496 = weight(_text_:context in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068473496 = score(doc=1050,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.38856095 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.011521274 = product of:
0.03456382 = sum of:
0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456382 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) presents a complex conceptual model. Because of this, it is not easy for everyone to understand. The purpose of this paper is to make some of the more difficult aspects of the FRBR model, in particular the Croup 1 entities work, expression, manifestation, and item, easier to understand by placing FRBR in the context of what it is: a conceptual entity-relationship model. To this end, a definition of the term "model" is presented, a variety of types and junctions of models are introduced, conceptual models are discussed in detail, modeling an abstraction is explained, and different ways of interpreting FRBR are suggested. Various models used in the history of cataloging are introduced to place FRBR in the context of the historical development of document models.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023)
0.03
0.031997908 = product of:
0.07999477 = sum of:
0.068473496 = weight(_text_:context in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068473496 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.38856095 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.011521274 = product of:
0.03456382 = sum of:
0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456382 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:00:14
-
Holley, R.P.: Cataloging : an exciting subject for exciting times (2002)
0.03
0.028020501 = product of:
0.07005125 = sum of:
0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05648775 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.013563501 = product of:
0.0406905 = sum of:
0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0406905 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Cataloging remains a fundamental component of library and information science and has many lessons to teach the architects of the Internet age. All students can benefit from taking a cataloging course, especially if it stresses cataloging as one specific answer to the problems of managing information and places cataloging within a larger context that also includes indexing and Internet search engines. Students deserve cataloging courses that combine theory and practice, avoid memorization, and require them to show a mastery of core principles rather than picky details. This paper includes specific suggestions on how to make cataloging exciting.
- Date
- 29. 7.2006 15:04:09
-
Hider, P.; Liu, Y.-H.: ¬The use of RDA elements in support of FRBR user tasks (2013)
0.03
0.028020501 = product of:
0.07005125 = sum of:
0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05648775 = score(doc=1958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
0.013563501 = product of:
0.0406905 = sum of:
0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0406905 = score(doc=1958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Resource Description and Access (RDA) stipulates that certain "core" elements should always be included, where applicable, in bibliographic and authority records, due to their importance in supporting the user tasks defined in Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. However, the elements' relative importance has not been empirically tested. This study investigates which elements in bibliographic records are currently most used in a university library catalog, by means of think-aloud sessions conducted by expert and non-expert users, who were assigned sets of typical bibliographic tasks. The results indicate that, in this context at least, the most utilized elements are not all core.
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:19:31
-
Kroeger, A.: ¬The road to BIBFRAME : the evolution of the idea of bibliographic transition into a post-MARC future (2013)
0.03
0.028020501 = product of:
0.07005125 = sum of:
0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05648775 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.013563501 = product of:
0.0406905 = sum of:
0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0406905 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article provides a representative overview of literature related to the idea of replacing MARC with a linked-data metadata structure, covering the period from 2002 through the 2012 release of the draft of the proposed bibliographic framework, BIBFRAME. Works proposing the replacement of MARC or exploring linked data in a library context are examined. In particular, key documents leading to the creation of the Library of Congress Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative are examined, along with some of the critical responses they received, to better understand the chain of ideas shaping BIBFRAME.
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:21:16
-
Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996)
0.03
0.027971694 = product of:
0.069929235 = sum of:
0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05648775 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.013441487 = product of:
0.04032446 = sum of:
0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04032446 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015)
0.03
0.027971694 = product of:
0.069929235 = sum of:
0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05648775 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.013441487 = product of:
0.04032446 = sum of:
0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04032446 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Takawashi, T.: Cataloging in Japan : relationship between Japanese and Western cataloging rules (2002)
0.03
0.027017955 = product of:
0.067544885 = sum of:
0.055919025 = weight(_text_:system in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055919025 = score(doc=5490,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
0.011625858 = product of:
0.034877572 = sum of:
0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034877572 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In 1943 the Japanese League of Young Librarians published Nippon Catalog Rules (NCR1942) based on ALA 1908, and adopted the author main-entry system for Japanese and Western materials. After World War II, the Japan Library Association (JLA) compiled and published NCR1952, based on ALA 1949 and LC 1949 but maintained the author main-entry system. The main-entry system was then replaced by an alternative heading method, which came to be known as the Description-Independent-System (DIS). NCR1965 adopted the main entry principle, which was based on the Paris Principles of 1961. NCR1977 was compiled and published by the JLA Cataloging Committee and based upon a "no-main-entry principle." Then in 1987, the Committee published the standard edition of the rules, which was completely compatible with the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD). NCR1987R was published in 1994 and NCR1987R01 in 2001, which included revised "Chapter 9: Computer Files," devised according to ISBD(ER).
- Date
- 29. 7.2006 19:54:35
-
Pagel, B.; Sigrist, B.: Erschließung elektronischer Dokumente in der Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB) (1999)
0.03
0.026390245 = product of:
0.065975614 = sum of:
0.046599183 = weight(_text_:system in 5017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046599183 = score(doc=5017,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 5017, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5017)
0.01937643 = product of:
0.05812929 = sum of:
0.05812929 = weight(_text_:29 in 5017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05812929 = score(doc=5017,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5017, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5017)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Seit Ende 1997 werden elektronische Zeitschriften zunehmend in der ZDB katalogisiert. Die Verfasserinnen beschreiben den erreichten Stand in Bezug auf notwendig gewordene strukturelle Anpassungen im System und Ergänzungen der ZDB-Katalogisierungsvorschriften, Entstehung und Festlegungen des Regelwerks NBM werden diskutiert
- Date
- 29. 8.2000 12:05:08
-
Silva, S.M. de; Zainab, A.N.: ¬An adviser for cataloguing conference proceedings : design and development of CoPAS (2000)
0.03
0.025947496 = product of:
0.06486874 = sum of:
0.048427295 = weight(_text_:system in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048427295 = score(doc=966,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
0.016441446 = product of:
0.049324337 = sum of:
0.049324337 = weight(_text_:29 in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049324337 = score(doc=966,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article describes the design and development of an expert adviser to catalogue published conference proceedings. The Conference Proceeding Adviser System (CoPAS) was designed to educate novice cataloguers in creating bibliographic records for published conference proceedings as well as to improve conventional instruction in the cataloguing of conference proceedings. The development tool was Asymetrix ToolBook !!. The knowledge base of the expert system was in the domain of cataloguing published conference proceedings and consists of public and private knowledge. Public/published knowledge are the relevant AACR2R rules that wer, identified based an the nine types of published conference proceedings. Private knowledge or heuristics was elicited from three human expert cataloguers through a multiple-observation approach. The elicited personal knowledge was then modelled into a mental map of their thought processes an how to provide a bibliographic description for published conference proceedings. Based an the mental mapping of the experts, the expert adviser system was designed and developed.
- Date
- 4. 9.2002 9:29:37
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.3, S.63-80
-
Wakeling, S.; Clough, P.; Connaway, L.S.; Sen, B.; Tomás, D.: Users and uses of a global union catalog : a mixed-methods study of WorldCat.org (2017)
0.03
0.025459195 = product of:
0.063647985 = sum of:
0.040348392 = weight(_text_:context in 3794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040348392 = score(doc=3794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.22896172 = fieldWeight in 3794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3794)
0.023299592 = weight(_text_:system in 3794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023299592 = score(doc=3794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 3794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3794)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the first large-scale investigation of the users and uses of WorldCat.org, the world's largest bibliographic database and global union catalog. Using a mixed-methods approach involving focus group interviews with 120 participants, an online survey with 2,918 responses, and an analysis of transaction logs of approximately 15 million sessions from WorldCat.org, the study provides a new understanding of the context for global union catalog use. We find that WorldCat.org is accessed by a diverse population, with the three primary user groups being librarians, students, and academics. Use of the system is found to fall within three broad types of work-task (professional, academic, and leisure), and we also present an emergent taxonomy of search tasks that encompass known-item, unknown-item, and institutional information searches. Our results support the notion that union catalogs are primarily used for known-item searches, although the volume of traffic to WorldCat.org means that unknown-item searches nonetheless represent an estimated 250,000 sessions per month. Search engine referrals account for almost half of all traffic, but although WorldCat.org effectively connects users referred from institutional library catalogs to other libraries holding a sought item, users arriving from a search engine are less likely to connect to a library.
