Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.03995956 = product of:
  0.099898905 = sum of:
    0.080696784 = weight(_text_:context in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.080696784 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.45792344 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
    0.019202124 = product of:
      0.057606373 = sum of:
        0.057606373 = weight(_text_:22 in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057606373 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Discusses information in the context of information resources management arguing that it is an essential resource for every organization but one that needs to be managed better. Examines information as a resource, as an asset, as a commodity, as a rubbish

Source

Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.22-23

0.0129114855 = product of:
  0.064557426 = sum of:
    0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 4895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064557426 = score(doc=4895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 4895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4895)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Summarizes the different knowledge transfer practices that will dominate besiness and organizations in the next few years. Discusses cyberspace and the trend towards virtualization and sets out the differences between data, information, knowledge, intelligence, and wisdom. Describes the context of external cyberspace and the Internet, and dealing with a surplus of information. Discusses internal cyberspace and the use of forums, and addresses the question of the virtualization of paper based information centres

0.01129755 = product of:
  0.05648775 = sum of:
    0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05648775 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The economics of information is a cross disciplinary area in which the paradigms from 2 disciplines, economics and information science, operate to influence the conceptualisation of the value of information. In this paper we investigate the relationship between information and economics through an analysis of representational literature on the value of information in both disciplines. It was concluded that whilst the search continues at a theoretical level for a conceptualisation of the value of information which can be operationalised, a pragmatic view should be taken in practice based on the level of analysis and context of examination of the value of information

0.009129799 = product of:
  0.045648996 = sum of:
    0.045648996 = weight(_text_:context in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045648996 = score(doc=99,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.25904062 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The paper discusses the applicability of contemporary knowledge theories to the study of information and knowledge as conditions of the survival and development of social organizations. Its relevance is connected to the importance that the variability of environmental conditions acquired from the acceleration of time and the relocation of space, as a result of the contemporary technological innovations. The majority of the managerial models, which focus on the production of information and organizational knowledge, share premises originated from a view of the world based on the myth of absolute objectivity. According to this interpretation, the organizational issue is related to the identification of procedures and rules, which enable the organizations to reach an optimal position in relation to the environmental conditions they face. Reflection on information and knowledge in organizations based on presuppositions of contemporary knowledge theories treats the relevance of circumstantial factors in the organization-environment context acknowledging the fact that the specifics in each organization are, at the same time, the contingency and the possibility of its survival. In this context, learning is not a procedure that can be normalized or generalized, but a process and a product of the survival of the organization. Keeping in mind the distance between this approach and the current patterns and methods - scientific knowledge based on the Cartesian method - the article focuses on the consequences of the hegemony of the scientific model of phenomena explanation - the myth of absolute objectivity - on the potential of the contemporary knowledge theory biology of knowing, or autopoiesis theory, by Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela, which is based on the premise that, for the study of organizations, the perception of the object/phenomenon, and its interpretation, is not reachable outside the perceptive experience itself

0.0023042548 = product of:
  0.011521274 = sum of:
    0.011521274 = product of:
      0.03456382 = sum of:
        0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03456382 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers

0.0011625858 = product of:
  0.005812929 = sum of:
    0.005812929 = product of:
      0.017438786 = sum of:
        0.017438786 = weight(_text_:29 in 5007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017438786 = score(doc=5007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 5007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5007)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

29. 1.1997 18:49:05