Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Bett, C.E.: ¬The Subject Access Project : a comparison with PRECIS (1979) 0.21
    0.20831694 = product of:
      0.34719488 = sum of:
        0.12911485 = weight(_text_:context in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12911485 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.7326775 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
        0.14352132 = weight(_text_:index in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14352132 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
        0.0745587 = weight(_text_:system in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0745587 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Theme
    Preserved Context Index System (PRECIS)
  2. Beatty, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms : the Australian Defence Force Academy experience (1992) 0.05
    0.04856749 = product of:
      0.12141872 = sum of:
        0.08879929 = weight(_text_:index in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08879929 = score(doc=4649,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In 1986, all titles added to the collection at the Australian Defence Force Academy Library, are processed through their OPAC via a subject enhancement procedure (ESP). The procedure used for subject enhancement is based on the techniques developed by P.A. Atherton and B. Settel during the Subject Access Project at Syracuse Univ., 1977. Terms are selected from contents pages or the index of the book, depending on whether the terms are content bearing, and whether the terms refer to 5 or more pages of text. This results in the addition of an average of 73 words or 20 phrases to each MARC record. The terms are keyed into the MARC field 653 using in house modifications of the library's URICA system
  3. Beatty, S.: Table of contents or index data for subject enrichment : sources and developments (1993) 0.05
    0.046794422 = product of:
      0.11698605 = sum of:
        0.10148491 = weight(_text_:index in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10148491 = score(doc=3939,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the present manual procedures at the Australian Defence Force Academy Library for subject enrichment with reference to the evaluation with reference to the evaluation study carried out in 1991. Investigates potential sources of contents and index data in machine readable form. Reports of the Monographic Table of Contents Project at OCLC and on the latest developments in USMARC format for contents page data
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 19(1993) no.1, S.16-29
  4. Diodato, V.: Tables of contents and book indexes : how well do they match readers' descriptions of books? (1986) 0.04
    0.04089543 = product of:
      0.102238566 = sum of:
        0.04841807 = weight(_text_:context in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04841807 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27475408 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
        0.0538205 = weight(_text_:index in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0538205 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The author collected information about tables of content and index terms in 125 books borrowed by patrons in a medium-sized academic library. To learn how useful the term would be as subject terms in a library catalog, he determined which of these terms were the same as the words used by the patrons to describe the books. For 72,4% of the books assigned LCSH, the patron's term matched the LCheading. The patron's term matched the table of contents term for (1,3% of the books with tables of contents. If the catalog had included terms from the tables of contents and the indexes in addition to the LCSH, the success rate would have been 97,3%. One problem in using terms from books in a library catalog is that many books lack indexes and/or tables of context
  5. Hauer, M.: Collaborative Catalog Enrichment : Digitalisierung und Information Retrieval (2011) 0.04
    0.036581982 = product of:
      0.09145495 = sum of:
        0.044850416 = weight(_text_:index in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044850416 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
        0.046604536 = product of:
          0.0699068 = sum of:
            0.041103613 = weight(_text_:29 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041103613 = score(doc=160,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
            0.028803186 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028803186 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Kurz nach 11 Uhr erscheint ein seltsamer Mensch am InfoDesk der Universitätsbibliothek und spricht die diensthabende Bibliothekarin an: "Frosch!". Mh, was meint der? Sonst sagt er nichts. Will er sich vorstellen? Herr Frosch? Wurde er im Eingangsbereich von einem Frosch erschreckt, der sich zufällig dorthin verirrte? Sucht er Literatur zu Fröschen? Märchen, mit dem Froschkönig? Will er Froschschenkel zum Mittagessen zubereiten? Ein Erstsemester, der in Biologie sich mit dem Tier befasst? Frosch als Fresser oder als gefressen werden? Ist das etwa der Autor Karl Frosch oder sucht er Literatur von diesem? Ein der Sprache nicht ganz mächtiger Ausländer? Ein Verrückter? Mh, Alter, Geschlecht, Kleidung, Sprache, Gestik - all dies wird schnell durchgeprüft. Ganz so kurz, kann man doch eine Dipl.-Bibl. nicht so einfach ansprechen. Unverschämt! ... Ungewöhnlich? Keineswegs, ist dies doch unsere normale Art, sich mit Suchmaschinen und OPACs zu unterhalten. Ebenso wenig wie eine Bibliothekarin hier eine zufriedenstellende Antwort bieten kann, weiß auch keine Suchmaschine, was das Anliegen dieser Person ist. Weit schneller als die Bibliothekarin kann sie aber in ihrem Index das Suchwort aufspüren und eine Treffermenge vermelden. Der Schlitz der Suchmaschine hat im Gegensatz zum "Schlitz" der Bibliothek, dem InfoDesk, keine Augen und Ohren, hat kein stimulierendes Lächeln, die Frage weiter erläutern zu lassen.
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:10:14
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  6. Wormell, I.: Indizacion SAP para la exploracion del amplio contexto tematico de libros y para el accesso a entidades semanticos mas pequenas (1994) 0.03
    0.028020501 = product of:
      0.07005125 = sum of:
        0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05648775 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
        0.013563501 = product of:
          0.0406905 = sum of:
            0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0406905 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    SAP indexing for exploring the full thematic context of books and for access to smaller semantic entites
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:01:59
  7. Müller, C.; Sternitzke, N.; Stratmann, R.; Parschik, T.: Kataloganreicherung und Zeitschriftenerschließung mit MyBib eDoc und C-3 am Ibero-Amerikanischen Institut, Preußischer Kulturbesitz : Neue Verfahren zur Optimierung der bibliografischen Nachweissituation in einer großen Spezialbibliothek (2010) 0.03
    0.027752852 = product of:
      0.06938213 = sum of:
        0.050742455 = weight(_text_:index in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050742455 = score(doc=3499,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27311024 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
        0.018639674 = weight(_text_:system in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018639674 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Bibliothek des lbero-Amerikanischen Instituts der Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz in Berlin (IAI) ist mit über 830.000 Monografien, 33.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen, von denen ca. 5.000 als laufende Abos geführt werden, und zahlreichen weiteren großen Sondersammlungen (Landkarten, Tonträger, Videos, DVDs, Nachlässe etc.) die größte Spezialbibliothek zu Lateinamerika, Spanien, Portugal und der Karibik in Europa und nach der Library of Congress in Washington und der Nettie-Lee-Benson-Collection der University of Texas in Austin die drittgrößte Spezialbibliothek dieser Art in der Welt. Über Kauf, Tausch und Schenkung erweitert sich der Bestand jedes Jahr um ca. 30.000 Monografien. Um die Nachweissituation von Sammelband- und Zeitschriftenaufsätzen und gleichzeitig das bibliografische Informationsangebot im Sinne einer Spezialbibliothek zu verbessern, hat das IAl in den letzten zwei Jahren zwei neue Geschäftsgänge eingeführt, mit denen die seit der Gründung des IAI vor fast 80 Jahren gängige Praxis, ausgewählte Aufsätze aus Zeitschriften und Sammelbänden zu erschließen, automatisiert wurde. Als erstes trat die Bibliothek des IAI 2007 dem System der Online-Contents-Sondersammelgebietsausschnitte (OLC-SSG) des GBV bei und betreut seitdem den OLC-SSG Ibero-Amerika. Es werden dazu im IAI sowohl die aktuellen als auch die bis zum Jahr 2000 zurückreichenden Inhaltsverzeichnisse von 780 laufenden Zeitschriftentiteln auf Artikelebene erschlossen.
    Zur Bewältigung dieser Menge an Artikeldaten kommt im IAI die Software C-3 der ImageWare Components GmbH zum Einsatz, die es ermöglicht, die formale Erschließung in einem größtenteils automatisierten Geschäftsgang durchzuführen. In den einzelnen Modulen von C-3 erfolgt die automatische Erkennung der Titel-, Autoren- und Seitenzahlinformationen in den gescannten Inhaltsverzeichnissen sowie deren automatische Indexierung und Konversion in Katalogisate. An den Indexierungsarbeitsplätzen kommen normale Standard-PCs zum Einsatz, über die auf die Auftragsverwaltung des zentralen C-3 Periodikaservers per Browser zugegriffen wird. Die C-3 Software besteht aus den Programmmodulen C-3 Template und C-3 Index. In C-3 Template werden einmalig für jeden Zeitschriftentitel die Struktur der Inhaltsverzeichnisse (Interpretationstyp Regel, Tabelle oder Freiform), die Abfolge von Aufsatztitel, Autoren und Seitenzahlen sowie die Schriftattribute (fett, kursiv etc.) der bibliografischen Daten festgelegt. Auf Basis dieser Templatedefinition werden die Scans der jeweiligen Inhaltsverzeichnisse im C-3 Index Modul mit der OCR Software Abbyy Fine Reader so erkannt, dass die bibliografischen Informationen der einzelnen Aufsätze bereits kategorisiert und aufsatzweise separiert ausgegeben werden. Die dabei erzeugten Daten können, sofern erforderlich, noch während der Bearbeitung mit C-3 mit einer Reihe von integrierten Nachbearbeitungstools korrigiert und im Anschluss im XML-Format an den C-3 Periodikaserver exportiert werden. Automatische Konversionsroutinen erzeugen aus den xml-Dateien serverseitig Artikeldaten im Pica3-Format, die nach einer abschließenden Qualitätskontrolle in die Online Contents Datenbanken des GBV eingespielt werden.
  8. Advances in online public access catalogs : Vol.1 (1992) 0.03
    0.027260004 = product of:
      0.068150006 = sum of:
        0.044850416 = weight(_text_:index in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044850416 = score(doc=4653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
        0.023299592 = weight(_text_:system in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023299592 = score(doc=4653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: USER INTERFACES: HULSER, R.P.: Overview of graphical user interfaces; TROUTMA, L.: The online public access catalog and music materials: issues for system and interface design; MISCHO, W.H. u. T.W. COLE: The Illinois extended OPAC: library information workstation design and development; BALLARD, T. u. J. SMITH: The human interface: an ongoing study of OPAC usage at Adelphi University; Pt.2: ENHANCING THE TRADITIONAL CATALOG RECORD: WITTENBACH; S.A.: Building a better mousetrap: enhanced cataloging and access for the online catalog; BEATTY, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms: the Australian Defence Force Academy experience; Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (MARBI discussion paper; no.46); Pt.3: REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE OPAC AND MOVING BEYOND THE LIBRARY WALLS: TROLL, D.A.: The Mercury Project: meeting the expectations of electronc library patrons; JAMIESON, R.C.: Oriental language materials in online public access catalogues; JUZNIC, P. u. H. PAAR: Cooperative cataloguing in Yugoslavia and the development of the OPAC; PERRY, A.: The PACLink Project at the State University of New York: leveraging collections for the future
  9. Bellei, M.: ¬Un catalogo 'ricco' (1998) 0.02
    0.021112198 = product of:
      0.052780494 = sum of:
        0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03727935 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    To enhance descriptions, cataloguers can add 'enriching' words or phrases to titles, or introduce content-enriched access features to aid subject-based research. Additional and natural language subject headings designed to support, though not replace, controlled language headings can result in enhanced indexing. Analytical cataloguing and double indexing are 2 other means by which readers can gian access to additional bibliographic data. Also examines how online research tool effectiveness can be enhanced by a system of automatic links between descriptors
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  10. Cousins, S.A.: Enhancing subject access to OPACs : controlled vocabulary vs. natural language (1992) 0.02
    0.01864397 = product of:
      0.09321985 = sum of:
        0.09321985 = weight(_text_:index in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09321985 = score(doc=2230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.50173557 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Experimental evidence suggests that enhancing the subject content of OPAC records can improve retrieval performance. This is based on the use of natural language index terms derived from the table of contents and back-of-the-book index of documents. The research reported here investigates the alternative approach of translating these natural language terms into controlled vocabulary. Subject queries were collected by interview at the catalogue, and indexing of the queries demonstrated the impressive ability of PRECIS, and to a lesser extent LCSH, to represent users' information needs. DDC performed poorly in this respect. The assumption was made that an index language adequately specific to represent users' queries should be adequate to represent document contents. Searches were carried out on three test databases, and both natural language and PRECIS enhancement of MARC records increased the number of relevant documents found, with PRECIS showing the better performance. However, with weak stemming the advantage of PRECIS was lost. Consideration must also be given to the potential advantages of controlled vocabulary, over and above basic retrieval performance measures
  11. Makinen, R.H.; Friesen B.: Enhancing online bibliographic records to improve retrieval of reference collection monographs (1995) 0.02
    0.017940167 = product of:
      0.08970083 = sum of:
        0.08970083 = weight(_text_:index in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08970083 = score(doc=1700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a project to enhance the records of the reference book collection, held on the online catalogue of the Minnesota University, Bio-Medical Library, with tables of contents or summaries; and to keyword index the enhancement fields to improve searching
  12. Unser, M.; Wäckerlin, D.: Dienstleistung "Abstract/Index" im NEBIS-Katalog (2006) 0.02
    0.016046174 = product of:
      0.08023087 = sum of:
        0.08023087 = weight(_text_:index in 5030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08023087 = score(doc=5030,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.43182522 = fieldWeight in 5030, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5030)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die ETH-Bibliothek bietet seit Anfang des Jahres 2006 ihre Dienstleistung "Abstract / Index" in erweiterter Form an (http://www.ethbib.ethz.ch/abstract /abstract.html). Somit können zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt für mehr als 50.000 im Katalog des Schweizer Bibliothekenverbundes NEBIS nachgewiesene Bücher, ergänzende inhaltliche Informationen abgerufen werden. Hierzu gehören Abstracts, Inhaltsverzeichnisse sowie Angaben zu Autorinnen und Autoren. Die Recherche erfolgt über die Link-Verknüpfung "Abstract / Index" im Katalog. Da es sich bei der ETH-Bibliothek um eine reine Magazinbibliothek handelt, wird mit diesen Zusatzinformationen den Benutzerinnen und Benutzern der Bibliothek die Vorselektion der Bücher und somit eine gezieltere Auswahl wesentlich erleichtert. Bücher, die von vornherein nicht von Interesse sind, kommen deshalb erst gar nicht in den Ausleihprozess und stehen somit anderen Nutzern unmittelbar zur Verfügung. Grundsätzlich gibt es zwei Möglichkeiten, die Links abzufragen: Bei der Abfrage in der Katalogdatenbank kann in der Vollanzeige eines Titels der Link "Abstract / Index" angeklickt werden, worauf sich ein Pop-up-Fenster mit den zusätzlichen Informationen öffnet. Bei der natürlichsprachigen Abfrage können die Suchergebnisse um die Funktion "Abstract / Index" erweitert werden. Finden sich die gesuchten Begriffe dann in den verlinkten Informationstexten, so erhöht sich die Anzahl der Treffer. Technisch handelt es sich bei diesem Angebot um eine in das Bibliothekssystem Aleph integrierte Lösung, wobei die zusätzlichen Informationen in einer parallel zum NEBIS-Katalog geführten Datenbank gespeichert sind. In diese separate Datenbank werden gleichzeitig größere Datenmengen eingespeist, die zum einen von den Verlagen Wiley und Springer zu Verfügung gestellt werden. Weiter geht es um eine beträchtliche Anzahl von Daten, die die ETH-Bibliothek selbst erfasst. Die zu den Textinformationen gehörenden Datensätze im Katalog werden anhand der ISBN identifiziert und mit einem MARC-Feld 856 versehen. Über dieses Link-Feld können die Zusatzinformationen dann dem entsprechenden Datensatz im Katalog zugeordnet werden. Naturgemäss ist dieses Dienstleistungsangebot ein "Work in progress", was bedeutet, dass der mittlerweile vorhandene Datenpool an Abstracts und anderen Informationen fortlaufend ausgebaut wird. So wird etwa bis Ende des Jahres 2007 das Gros der in der ETH-Bibliothek vorhandenen Bücher mit Erscheinungsjahr 1995 und jünger nachträglich bearbeitet und in die Katalogdatenbank integriert. Hierzu parallel wird die Aufnahme der Neuzugänge kontinuierlich weitergeführt. Zusammen werden somit zukünftig etwa 1.000 neue Abstracts pro Monat generiert.
  13. Smith, I.A.; O'Brien, A.: Signposts to information : keywords, indexes and thesauri (1993) 0.01
    0.00745587 = product of:
      0.03727935 = sum of:
        0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03727935 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Shortened and revised version of a paper presented during an Education Librarian's Group session at the Under One Umbrella Two Conference, organized by the Library Association in Manchester, 9-11 Jul 93. With the possibility of free text searching and easy access to CD-ROM databases, users often do not realise that subject searching is enhanced by familiarity with the controlled vocabulary underlying the indexing system of the database. Discusses the construction of information retrieval thesauri, the problems of terminology and how the use of thesauri can make searching more effective, using education thesauri as examples
  14. Peis, E.; Fernandez-Molina, J.C.: Enrichment of bibliographic records of online catalogs through ORC and SGML technology (1998) 0.01
    0.006523886 = product of:
      0.03261943 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=3385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of research into the feasibility of using OCR scanner technology to capture contents pages of collective monographs and to extract the bibliographic information of each individual work and process this using a standardized language, such as SGML, for tagging electronic documents. By this means, data can be used as electronic information or stored in OPACs, thus providing additional access points. Outlines a pilot system to test the initial hypotheses, show the feasibility of achieving the suggested goals and develop the tasks required for them to be carried out as automatically as possible
  15. Settel, B.; Cochrane, P.A.: Augmenting subject descriptions for books in online catalogs (1982) 0.01
    0.0062004575 = product of:
      0.031002287 = sum of:
        0.031002287 = product of:
          0.09300686 = sum of:
            0.09300686 = weight(_text_:29 in 390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09300686 = score(doc=390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=390)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Database. 5(1982), S.29(?)-(?)
  16. Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Subject searching in merged catalogues : a plea for redundancy (2008) 0.01
    0.0055919024 = product of:
      0.027959513 = sum of:
        0.027959513 = weight(_text_:system in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027959513 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    From a logical point of view, an OPAC is an inventory with indexes. Inventories can be accumulated and the indexes merged. However, in most merged catalogues not all documents have the same subject indexing and a number of documents are indexed by more than one system. In practice, a merged catalogue also contains descriptions without subject indexing. To augment the situation four methods are used: searching with title keywords, mapping and switching, acceptance of descriptions indexed in a given way only, and »citation pearl growing«. The last method uses all available subject indicators by using subject indicators present in relevant descriptions found by already known indicators. This method can also be of help in mapping and switching.
  17. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.005376595 = product of:
      0.026882974 = sum of:
        0.026882974 = product of:
          0.08064892 = sum of:
            0.08064892 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08064892 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  18. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.01
    0.005376595 = product of:
      0.026882974 = sum of:
        0.026882974 = product of:
          0.08064892 = sum of:
            0.08064892 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08064892 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  19. Ihadjadene, M.: ¬Les tables des matières dans les catalogues en ligne : opportunités, méthodes et couts (1998) 0.01
    0.005369754 = product of:
      0.026848769 = sum of:
        0.026848769 = product of:
          0.080546305 = sum of:
            0.080546305 = weight(_text_:29 in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080546305 = score(doc=2234,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    14. 4.2000 11:29:29
  20. Junger, U.: Möglichkeiten und Probleme automatischer Erschließungsverfahren in Bibliotheken : Bericht vom KASCADE-Workshop in der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf (1999) 0.00
    0.004650343 = product of:
      0.023251716 = sum of:
        0.023251716 = product of:
          0.069755144 = sum of:
            0.069755144 = weight(_text_:29 in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069755144 = score(doc=3645,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    23.10.1996 17:26:29