Search (151 results, page 2 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Concepts in Context : Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010 (2011) 0.02
    0.01997978 = product of:
      0.049949452 = sum of:
        0.040348392 = weight(_text_:context in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040348392 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.22896172 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
        0.009601062 = product of:
          0.028803186 = sum of:
            0.028803186 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028803186 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:34:18
  2. Si, L.: Encoding formats and consideration of requirements for mapping (2007) 0.02
    0.018424368 = product of:
      0.04606092 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
        0.013441487 = product of:
          0.04032446 = sum of:
            0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04032446 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    With the increasing requirement of establishing semantic mappings between different vocabularies, further development of these encoding formats is becoming more and more important. For this reason, four types of knowledge representation formats were assessed:MARC21 for Classification Data in XML, Zthes XML Schema, XTM(XML Topic Map), and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organisation System). This paper explores the potential of adapting these representation formats to support different semantic mapping methods, and discusses the implication of extending them to represent more complex KOS.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:27
  3. Giunchiglia, F.; Maltese, V.; Dutta, B.: Domains and context : first steps towards managing diversity in knowledge (2011) 0.02
    0.01804435 = product of:
      0.09022175 = sum of:
        0.09022175 = weight(_text_:context in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09022175 = score(doc=603,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.511974 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Despite the progress made, one of the main barriers towards the use of semantics is the lack of background knowledge. Dealing with this problem has turned out to be a very difficult task because on the one hand the background knowledge should be very large and virtually unbound and, on the other hand, it should be context sensitive and able to capture the diversity of the world, for instance in terms of language and knowledge. Our proposed solution consists in addressing the problem in three steps: (1) create an extensible diversity-aware knowledge base providing a continuously growing quantity of properly organized knowledge; (2) given the problem, build at run-time the proper context within which perform the reasoning; (3) solve the problem. Our work is based on two key ideas. The first is that of using domains, i.e. a general semantic-aware methodology and technique for structuring the background knowledge. The second is that of building the context of reasoning by a suitable combination of domains. Our goal in this paper is to introduce the overall approach, show how it can be applied to an important use case, i.e. the matching of classifications, and describe our first steps towards the construction of a large scale diversity-aware knowledge base.
    Content
    Also in: Journal of Web Semantics, special issue on Reasoning with Context in the Semantic Web, April 2012.
  4. Hubain, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hooland, S. van: Automated SKOS vocabulary design for the biopharmaceutical industry (2016) 0.02
    0.017759858 = product of:
      0.08879929 = sum of:
        0.08879929 = weight(_text_:index in 5132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08879929 = score(doc=5132,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 5132, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5132)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Ensuring quick and consistent access to large collections of unstructured documents is one of the biggest challenges facing knowledge-intensive organizations. Designing specific vocabularies to index and retrieve documents is often deemed too expensive, full-text search being preferred despite its known limitations. However, the process of creating controlled vocabularies can be partly automated thanks to natural language processing and machine learning techniques. With a case study from the biopharmaceutical industry, we demonstrate how small organizations can use an automated workflow in order to create a controlled vocabulary to index unstructured documents in a semantically meaningful way.
  5. Si, L.E.; O'Brien, A.; Probets, S.: Integration of distributed terminology resources to facilitate subject cross-browsing for library portal systems (2009) 0.02
    0.017020667 = product of:
      0.042551666 = sum of:
        0.032950602 = weight(_text_:system in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032950602 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.009601062 = product of:
          0.028803186 = sum of:
            0.028803186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028803186 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: To develop a prototype middleware framework between different terminology resources in order to provide a subject cross-browsing service for library portal systems. Design/methodology/approach: Nine terminology experts were interviewed to collect appropriate knowledge to support the development of a theoretical framework for the research. Based on this, a simplified software-based prototype system was constructed incorporating the knowledge acquired. The prototype involved mappings between the computer science schedule of the Dewey Decimal Classification (which acted as a spine) and two controlled vocabularies UKAT and ACM Computing Classification. Subsequently, six further experts in the field were invited to evaluate the prototype system and provide feedback to improve the framework. Findings: The major findings showed that given the large variety of terminology resources distributed on the web, the proposed middleware service is essential to integrate technically and semantically the different terminology resources in order to facilitate subject cross-browsing. A set of recommendations are also made outlining the important approaches and features that support such a cross browsing middleware service.
    Content
    This paper is a pre-print version presented at the ISKO UK 2009 conference, 22-23 June, prior to peer review and editing. For published proceedings see special issue of Aslib Proceedings journal.
  6. Posch, L.; Schaer, P.; Bleier, A.; Strohmaier, M.: ¬A system for probabilistic linking of thesauri and classification systems (2015) 0.02
    0.015980192 = product of:
      0.07990096 = sum of:
        0.07990096 = weight(_text_:system in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07990096 = score(doc=2515,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5966609 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a system which creates and visualizes probabilistic semantic links between concepts in a thesaurus and classes in a classification system. For creating the links, we build on the Polylingual Labeled Topic Model (PLL-TM) (Posch et al., in KI 2015: advances in artificial intelligence, 2015). PLL-TM identifies probable thesaurus descriptors for each class in the classification system by using information from the natural language text of documents, their assigned thesaurus descriptors and their designated classes. The links are then presented to users of the system in an interactive visualization, providing them with an automatically generated overview of the relations between the thesaurus and the classification system.
  7. Hubrich, J.: Concepts in Context - Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization : Internationale Fachtagung und Abschlussworkshop des DFG-Projekts CrissCross in Köln (2010) 0.02
    0.01597715 = product of:
      0.07988574 = sum of:
        0.07988574 = weight(_text_:context in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07988574 = score(doc=3857,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.4533211 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Am 19. und 20. Juli 2010 fand in der Fachhochschule Köln die internationale Tagung "Concepts in Context - Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization" statt. Ausgerichtet wurde sie mit finanzieller Unterstützung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) vom Institut für Informationsmanagement (IIM) der Fachhochschule Köln in Kooperation mit der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB). Im Mittelpunkt der Veranstaltung standen Fragen der Modellierung von Interoperabilität und semantischen Informationen in der Wissensorganisation, die einen unmittelbaren thematischen Zusammenhang mit den am Institut für Informationsmanagement angesiedelten Projekten CrissCross und RESEDA aufweisen.
  8. Hoekstra, R.: BestMap: context-aware SKOS vocabulary mappings in OWL 2 (2009) 0.02
    0.01597715 = product of:
      0.07988574 = sum of:
        0.07988574 = weight(_text_:context in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07988574 = score(doc=1574,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.4533211 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes an approach to SKOS vocabulary mapping that takes into account the context in which vocabulary terms are used in annotations. The standard vocabulary mapping properties in SKOS only allow for binary mappings between concepts. In the BestMap ontology, annotated resources are the contexts in which annotations coincide and allow for a more fine grained control over when mappings hold. A mapping between two vocabularies is defined as a class that groups descriptions of a resource. We use the OWL 2 features for property chains, disjoint properties, union, intersection and negation together with careful use of equivalence and subsumption to specify these mappings.
  9. Hoffmann, P.; Médini and , L.; Ghodous, P.: Using context to improve semantic interoperability (2006) 0.02
    0.01597715 = product of:
      0.07988574 = sum of:
        0.07988574 = weight(_text_:context in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07988574 = score(doc=4434,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.4533211 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an approach to enhance interoperability between heterogeneous ontologies. It consists in adapting the ranking of concepts to the final users and their work context. The computations are based on an upper domain ontology, a task hierarchy and a user profile. As prerequisites, OWL ontologie have to be given, and an articulation ontology has to be built.
  10. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Cross-concordances : terminology mapping and its effectiveness for information retrieval (2008) 0.02
    0.015834149 = product of:
      0.03958537 = sum of:
        0.027959513 = weight(_text_:system in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027959513 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
        0.011625858 = product of:
          0.034877572 = sum of:
            0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034877572 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The German Federal Ministry for Education and Research funded a major terminology mapping initiative, which found its conclusion in 2007. The task of this terminology mapping initiative was to organize, create and manage 'cross-concordances' between controlled vocabularies (thesauri, classification systems, subject heading lists) centred around the social sciences but quickly extending to other subject areas. 64 crosswalks with more than 500,000 relations were established. In the final phase of the project, a major evaluation effort to test and measure the effectiveness of the vocabulary mappings in an information system environment was conducted. The paper reports on the cross-concordance work and evaluation results.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:33:29
  11. Naudet, Y.; Latour, T.; Chen, D.: ¬A Systemic approach to Interoperability formalization (2009) 0.02
    0.015834149 = product of:
      0.03958537 = sum of:
        0.027959513 = weight(_text_:system in 2740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027959513 = score(doc=2740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2740)
        0.011625858 = product of:
          0.034877572 = sum of:
            0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 2740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034877572 = score(doc=2740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2740)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    With a first version developed last year, the Ontology of Interoperability (OoI) aims at formally describing concepts relating to problems and solutions in the domain of interoperability. From the beginning, the OoI has its foundations in the systemic theory and addresses interoperability from the general point of view of a system, whether it is composed by other systems (systems-of-systems) or not. In this paper, we present the last OoI focusing on the systemic approach. We then integrate a classification of interoperability knowledge provided by the Framework for Enterprise Interoperability. This way, we contextualize the OoI with a specific vocabulary to the enterprise domain, where solutions to interoperability problems are characterized according to interoperability approaches defined in the ISO 14258 and both solutions and problems can be localized into enterprises levels and characterized by interoperability levels, as defined in the European Interoperability Framework.
    Date
    29. 1.2016 18:48:14
  12. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.02
    0.015757065 = product of:
      0.07878532 = sum of:
        0.07878532 = product of:
          0.23635596 = sum of:
            0.23635596 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23635596 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3604703 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  13. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Houghton, A.; Childress, E.: Web services for controlled vocabularies (2006) 0.01
    0.013195123 = product of:
      0.032987807 = sum of:
        0.023299592 = weight(_text_:system in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023299592 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.009688215 = product of:
          0.029064644 = sum of:
            0.029064644 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029064644 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Amid the debates about whether folksonomies will supplant controlled vocabularies and whether the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system have outlived their usefulness, libraries, museums and other organizations continue to require efficient, effective access to controlled vocabularies for creating consistent metadata for their collections . In this article, we present an approach for using Web services to interact with controlled vocabularies. Services are implemented within a service-oriented architecture (SOA) framework. SOA is an approach to distributed computing where services are loosely coupled and discoverable on the network. A set of experimental services for controlled vocabularies is provided through the Microsoft Office (MS) Research task pane (a small window or sidebar that opens up next to Internet Explorer (IE) and other Microsoft Office applications). The research task pane is a built-in feature of IE when MS Office 2003 is loaded. The research pane enables a user to take advantage of a number of research and reference services accessible over the Internet. Web browsers, such as Mozilla Firefox and Opera, also provide sidebars which could be used to deliver similar, loosely-coupled Web services.
    Date
    28.12.2008 17:54:29
  14. Coen, G.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Toward better interoperability of the NARCIS classification (2019) 0.01
    0.013195123 = product of:
      0.032987807 = sum of:
        0.023299592 = weight(_text_:system in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023299592 = score(doc=5399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
        0.009688215 = product of:
          0.029064644 = sum of:
            0.029064644 = weight(_text_:29 in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029064644 = score(doc=5399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Research information can be useful to science stake-holders for discovering, evaluating and planning research activities. In the Netherlands, the institute tasked with the stewardship of national research information is DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services). DANS is the home of NARCIS, the national portal for research information, which uses a similarly named national research classification. The NARCIS Classification assigns symbols to represent the knowledge bases of contributing scholars. A recent research stream in knowledge organization known as comparative classification uses two or more classifications experimentally to generate empirical evidence about coverage of conceptual content, population of the classes, and economy of classification. This paper builds on that research in order to further understand the comparative impact of the NARCIS Classification alongside a classification designed specifically for information resources. Our six cases come from the DANS project Knowledge Organization System Observatory (KOSo), which itself is classified using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) created in 1982 by Ingetraut Dahlberg. ICC is considered to have the merits of universality, faceting, and a top-down approach. Results are exploratory, indicating that both classifications provide fairly precise coverage. The inflexibility of the NARCIS Classification makes it difficult to express complex concepts. The meta-ontological, epistemic stance of the ICC is apparent in all aspects of this study. Using the two together in the DANS KOS Observatory will provide users with both clarity of scientific positioning and ontological relativity.
    Date
    29. 9.2019 11:44:13
  15. Garcia Marco, F.J.: Compatibility & heterogeneity in knowledge organization : some reflections around a case study in the field of consumer information (2008) 0.01
    0.013160261 = product of:
      0.032900654 = sum of:
        0.023299592 = weight(_text_:system in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023299592 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
        0.009601062 = product of:
          0.028803186 = sum of:
            0.028803186 = weight(_text_:22 in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028803186 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A case study in compatibility and heterogeneity of knowledge organization (KO) systems and processes is presented. It is based in the experience of the author in the field of information for consumer protection, a good example of the emerging transdisciplinary applied social sciences. The activities and knowledge organization problems and solutions of the Aragonian Consumers' Information and Documentation Centre are described and analyzed. Six assertions can be concluded: a) heterogeneity and compatibility are certainly an inherent problem in knowledge organization and also in practical domains; b) knowledge organization is also a social task, not only a lögical one; c) knowledge organization is affected by economical and efficiency considerations; d) knowledge organization is at the heart of Knowledge Management; e) identifying and maintaining the focus in interdisciplinary fields is a must; f the different knowledge organization tools of a institution must be considered as an integrated system, pursuing a unifying model.
    Date
    16. 3.2008 18:22:50
  16. Hubrich, J.: Intersystem relations : Characteristics and functionalities (2011) 0.01
    0.0129114855 = product of:
      0.064557426 = sum of:
        0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 4780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064557426 = score(doc=4780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 4780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4780)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
  17. Folsom, S.M.: Using the Program for Cooperative Cataloging's past and present to project a Linked Data future (2020) 0.01
    0.0129114855 = product of:
      0.064557426 = sum of:
        0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 5747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064557426 = score(doc=5747,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 5747, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5747)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Drawing on the PCC's history with linked data and related work this article identifies and gives context to pressing areas PCC will need to focus on moving forward. These areas include defining plausible data targets, tractable implementation models and data flows, engaging in related tool development, and participating in the broader linked data community.
  18. Balakrishnan, U.; Krausz, A,; Voss, J.: Cocoda - ein Konkordanztool für bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme (2015) 0.01
    0.012685614 = product of:
      0.06342807 = sum of:
        0.06342807 = weight(_text_:index in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06342807 = score(doc=2030,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1676
  19. Gödert, W.: Ontological spine, localization and multilingual access : some reflections and a proposal (2008) 0.01
    0.01129755 = product of:
      0.05648775 = sum of:
        0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 4334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05648775 = score(doc=4334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 4334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4334)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper the following problem is discussed: Which possibilities exist to integrate localized knowledge into knowledge structures like classification systems or other documentary languages for the design of OPACs and information systems? It is proposed to combine a de-localized classificatory structure - best describes as 'ontological spine' - with multilingual semantic networks. Each of these networks should represent the respective localized knowledge along an extended set of typed semantic relations serving as entry points vocabulary as well as a semantic basis for navigational purposes within the localized knowledge context. The spine should enable a link between well-known and not well-known knowledge structures.
  20. Jacobs, J.-H.; Mengel, T.; Müller, K.: Insights and Outlooks : a retrospective view on the CrissCross project (2011) 0.01
    0.01129755 = product of:
      0.05648775 = sum of:
        0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 4785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05648775 = score(doc=4785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 4785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4785)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich

Years

Languages

  • e 126
  • d 24
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 102
  • el 49
  • m 6
  • x 5
  • s 3
  • p 2
  • r 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…