-
Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985)
0.03
0.026390245 = product of:
0.065975614 = sum of:
0.046599183 = weight(_text_:system in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046599183 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.01937643 = product of:
0.05812929 = sum of:
0.05812929 = weight(_text_:29 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05812929 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
-
Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986)
0.03
0.026390245 = product of:
0.065975614 = sum of:
0.046599183 = weight(_text_:system in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046599183 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.01937643 = product of:
0.05812929 = sum of:
0.05812929 = weight(_text_:29 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05812929 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
- Source
- Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 29(1986), S.648-656
-
Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986)
0.02
0.020466631 = product of:
0.05116658 = sum of:
0.03954072 = weight(_text_:system in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03954072 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.011625858 = product of:
0.034877572 = sum of:
0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034877572 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Recently, a detailed evaluation of a large, operational full-text document retrieval system was reported in the literature. Values of precision and recall were estimated usind traditional statistical sampling methods and blind evaluation procedures. The results of this evaluation demonstrated that the system tested was retrieving less then 20% of the relevant documents when the searchers believed it was retrieving over 75% of the relevant documents. This evaluation is described including some data not reported in the original article. Also discussed are the implications which this study has for how the subjects of documents should be represented, as well as the importance of rigorous retrieval evaluations for the furtherhance of information retrieval research
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: An evaluation ... Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299; Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.648-656; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
-
Bernstein, L.M.; Williamson, R.E.: Testing of a natural language retrieval system for a full text knowledge base (1984)
0.01
0.013047772 = product of:
0.06523886 = sum of:
0.06523886 = weight(_text_:system in 1803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06523886 = score(doc=1803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 1803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1803)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Dubois, C.P.R.: Free text vs. controlled vocabulary; a reassessment (1987)
0.01
0.0129114855 = product of:
0.064557426 = sum of:
0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064557426 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Free text and controlled vocabulary searching can no longer be viewed as antagonistic techniques in information retrieval since they both display advantages and weaknesses dependent on a fairly wide range of context, with the option to use both increasingly favoured. An attempt is made to present a list of features associated with the two techniques and to suggest a methodology to assist in deciding on the optimal retrieval technique for a particular purpose. The relevance of the techniques in expert systems and full text contexts is also discussed. Finally, recommendations for further research are suggested, concentrating on survey techniques in real-life retrieval situations
-
Perez, E.: Text enhancement : Controlled vocabulary vs. free text (1982)
0.01
0.00745587 = product of:
0.03727935 = sum of:
0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 1355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03727935 = score(doc=1355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1355)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Full-text databases are becoming increasingly practical for publication and general use, since most publishers now use some form of computerized editorial and publication system. "Free text" retrieval from full-text databases is possible with many existing systems, but some information professionals are doubtful about the quality of information retrieval using this type of access. The "augmentation" or "enrichment" needed for practical operation of these systems is discussed
-
Tenopir, C.: Searching by controlled vocabulary or free text (1987)
0.01
0.0062004575 = product of:
0.031002287 = sum of:
0.031002287 = product of:
0.09300686 = sum of:
0.09300686 = weight(_text_:29 in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09300686 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Library journal. 112(1987) Nov.15, S.58-29
-
Wenzel, F.: Semantische Eingrenzung im Freitext-Retrieval auf der Basis morphologischer Segmentierungen (1980)
0.00
0.003875286 = product of:
0.01937643 = sum of:
0.01937643 = product of:
0.05812929 = sum of:
0.05812929 = weight(_text_:29 in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05812929 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 31(1980) H.1, S.29-35
-
Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989)
0.00
0.0023042548 = product of:
0.011521274 = sum of:
0.011521274 = product of:
0.03456382 = sum of:
0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456382 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 9. 1.1996 10:22:31
