Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  1. Kanjilal, A.: Permuted keyword index using CDS/ISIS : a tutorial (1992) 0.06
    0.058114816 = product of:
      0.14528704 = sum of:
        0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 5810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05648775 = score(doc=5810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 5810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5810)
        0.08879929 = weight(_text_:index in 5810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08879929 = score(doc=5810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 5810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5810)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a utility program designed to generate a permuted keyword index from a CDS/ISIS database. The different keywords which are used to describe the subject content of documents are presented together in a string, thus showing the context in which the lead term is used. Indexes can also be generated for any repeatable field, such as author and report number. The string is rotated from left to right to provide an access from each of the terms used. Pascal is the language used and a step by step tutorial is given to create the necessary databases
  2. Biswas, S.C.; Smith, F.: Efficiency and effectiveness of deep structure based indexing languages : PRECIS vs. DSIS (1991) 0.05
    0.049060576 = product of:
      0.122651435 = sum of:
        0.08970083 = weight(_text_:index in 2187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08970083 = score(doc=2187,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 2187, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2187)
        0.032950602 = weight(_text_:system in 2187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032950602 = score(doc=2187,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 2187, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2187)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A subject indexing language (SIL) is an artificial language used for formulating names of subjects and is composed of (a) a vocabulary, (b) a list of elementary categories, and (c) the rules of syntax. A string indexing language is an SIL, whose expressions are multiple overlappimg index entries, constructed accordingly to explicit syntax rules. PRECIS, developed by Austin, and POPSI, developed by Bhattacharyya, are two such string indexing languages. DSIS is a more versatile version of the POPSI system, developed by Devadason. There have been several attempts to compare and evaluate the superiority of one system over another, with the exception that none of these tried to compare their performances from the searcher's point of view. This present study tries to compare the efficiency and effectiveness of printed subject indexes produced by PRECIS and DSIS on a non-empirical basis and based on the following five major characteristics of index entries identified by Craven as desirable from the searcher's viewpoint: (1) predicitibility, (2) collocation, (3) clarity, (4) succinctness, and (5) eliminability. A representative sample of 600 documents (both macro and micro), chosen from three different social science subject fields, has been used as the test data. The main points of discussion are (a) the term structure, (b) the term relationships, and (c) the entry structure, generated by the two systems. On the whole, a PRECIS index performs better than a DSIS index in terms of most of the above characteristics. It has been concluded that the user will search the former more efficiently and effectively than the latter
  3. MacEwan, A.: LCSH and the British Library : an international subject authority database? (1996) 0.04
    0.038164005 = product of:
      0.09541001 = sum of:
        0.06279058 = weight(_text_:index in 7412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06279058 = score(doc=7412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 7412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7412)
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 7412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=7412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 7412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7412)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The LCSH system is still an important part of the future for subject access to catalogues of bibliographic records. The British Library has decided to reinstate LCSH to records created for the BNB, because of the economic necessity of cooperation and because it provides an available common standard. Outlines development plans for the LCSH, and the British Library's involvement through its participation in the Subject Authorities Cooperative programme. It will also be involved in: training in the application of LCSH, and indexing of works of literature and fiction. The cooperative trend is now towards the creation of an international subject authority database
    Source
    Catalogue and index. 1996, no.120, S.1-6
  4. Da Silva, A.M.; Azevedo, L.M. de; Nogueira, M.D.L.R.: ¬A aplicacao do SIPORbase : uma proposta de indexacao do manuscrito e do livro antigo (1995) 0.02
    0.024021262 = product of:
      0.060053155 = sum of:
        0.048427295 = weight(_text_:system in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048427295 = score(doc=1639,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
        0.011625858 = product of:
          0.034877572 = sum of:
            0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034877572 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    SIPORbase, the System for Indexing in Portuguese, was developed by the National Library of Portugal, based on the LCSH. In contrast to the Brunet-Parguez system used in France, SIPORbase is a coextensive indexing language. Its initial application in 1989 to current bibliography has been extended to the collection of codices. Experience with manuscripts only indicates a high degree of relevance in retrieval, from the several hundred subject headings created so far
    Content
    Revised version of a presentation given at a LIBER workshop on The Brunet-Parguez system for subject indexing of ancient books, held in Toulouse in Feb 1994
    Date
    29. 7.1998 13:16:16
  5. Prasher, R.G.: Index and indexing (1990) 0.02
    0.017940167 = product of:
      0.08970083 = sum of:
        0.08970083 = weight(_text_:index in 4777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08970083 = score(doc=4777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 4777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4777)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  6. Bloomfield, M.: ¬A look at subject headings : a plea for standardization (1993) 0.02
    0.017759858 = product of:
      0.08879929 = sum of:
        0.08879929 = weight(_text_:index in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08879929 = score(doc=2475,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the preparation of a book on how to do a literature search, many inconsistencies were found in the assignment of subject terms. The Library of Congress Subject Headings is cited for not bringing computer languages into a consistent pattern. BASIC and FORTRAN are treated differently in their see also references and are without references to the words "computers" or "computer." Also index terms for the literature search on the "search for extraterrestrial life" showed inconsistent patterns in indexing. Catalogers and indexers need to review the work they are currently publishing and try to decide how to bring some standardization to the construction of subject terms. There is a need to provide a single thesaurus for all English index terms.
  7. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : I. The best of pre-coordination and post-coordination (1998) 0.01
    0.013694699 = product of:
      0.068473496 = sum of:
        0.068473496 = weight(_text_:context in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068473496 = score(doc=2322,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.38856095 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The introduction of computerized post-coordination has solved many of the problems of pre-coordinated subject access. However, the adoption of computerized post-coordination results in the loss of some pre-coordination benefits. Specifically, the effect of hiding terms within the context of others is lost in post-coodination which give lead status to every document term. This results in spurious matches of terms out of context. Library patrons and Internet searchers are increasingly dissatisfied with subject access performance, in part because of unmanageably large retrieval sets. The need to enhance precision and limit the size of retrieval sets motivates this work which proposes partial coordination, an approach which incorporates the advantages of computer search with the ability of pre-coordination to limit spurious partial matches and thereby enhance precision
  8. Glowacka, T.: Jezyk hasel przedmiotowych KABA po szesciu latach istnienia (1999) 0.01
    0.011183805 = product of:
      0.055919025 = sum of:
        0.055919025 = weight(_text_:system in 3139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055919025 = score(doc=3139,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 3139, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3139)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: KABA subject headings system: 6 years of its development
  9. McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995) 0.01
    0.010544192 = product of:
      0.05272096 = sum of:
        0.05272096 = weight(_text_:system in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05272096 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Enthält das Ergebnis einer Befragung. 0 hielten das System für sehr gut; 13 für gut; 11 für halbwegs gut; 7 für halbwegs gut; 11 für schlecht. 8,9% der Befragten würden das System übernehmen, 47,5% nicht, 43,6% vielleicht
  10. Villiers, L. de: On-line subject retrieval on CPALS : help us choose! (1996) 0.01
    0.010544192 = product of:
      0.05272096 = sum of:
        0.05272096 = weight(_text_:system in 4935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05272096 = score(doc=4935,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 4935, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4935)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A decision must be made about the selection of a system of subject headings for the Library Service of the Western Cape in South Africa. Describes the advantages and disadvantages of the LCSH and of the Provincial Library Service of the Western Cape Subject Indes with a request to users to provide feedback about the preferred system
  11. Conway, M. O'Hara: Characteristics of subject headings in the Library of Congress BOOKSM database (1993) 0.01
    0.0092261685 = product of:
      0.04613084 = sum of:
        0.04613084 = weight(_text_:system in 3135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04613084 = score(doc=3135,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 3135, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3135)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A thourough understanding of current subject cataloging practice, especially Library of Congress practice, will assist librarians in making the best use of new and emerging technology to ease the task of constructing subject headings. To gain insight into the most current subject cataloging practices at the Library of Congress, a random sample of one thousand bibliographic records with one or more 6XX fields and Library of Congress card numbers assigned from 1988 to the present was drawn from the BOOKSM database. Library of Congress catalogers rely heavily on the system of free-floating subdivisions in the process of constructing subject headings. Attempts to improve the subject cataloging process must take into account this fundamental characteristic of the Library of Congress subject headings system
  12. Stumpf, G.: RSWK - wirklich ein Relikt? (1995) 0.01
    0.0065765786 = product of:
      0.03288289 = sum of:
        0.03288289 = product of:
          0.098648675 = sum of:
            0.098648675 = weight(_text_:29 in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098648675 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Soll eine Erwiderung sein auf: Lepsky, K.: RSWK - und was noch in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.4/5, S.670-682
  13. Mikacic, M.: Teorijski osnove sustava za predmetno oznacivanje (1996) 0.01
    0.006523886 = product of:
      0.03261943 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Übers. des Titels: Theoretical foundations of a system for subject heading assignments
  14. Lopes, M.I.: Principles underlying subject heading languages : an international approach (1996) 0.01
    0.006523886 = product of:
      0.03261943 = sum of:
        0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03261943 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the problems in establishing commonly accepted principles for subject retrieval between different bibliographic systems. The Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages was established to devise general principles for any subject retrieval system and to review existing real systems in the light of such principles and compare them in order to evaluate the extent of their coverage and their application in current practices. Provides a background and history of the Working Group. Discusses the principles underlying subject headings and their purposes and the state of the work and major findings
  15. Badalamenti, G.: ¬L'¬introduzione del GRIS in un sistema multibiblioteche : realta e problemi aperti (1997) 0.01
    0.0055919024 = product of:
      0.027959513 = sum of:
        0.027959513 = weight(_text_:system in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027959513 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The introduction of the GRIS subject heading scheme in a multi library system: reality and continuing problems
  16. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995) 0.00
    0.0046085096 = product of:
      0.023042548 = sum of:
        0.023042548 = product of:
          0.06912764 = sum of:
            0.06912764 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912764 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:37:22
  17. (Sears') List of Subject Headings (1994) 0.00
    0.0026882975 = product of:
      0.013441487 = sum of:
        0.013441487 = product of:
          0.04032446 = sum of:
            0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04032446 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
  18. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0023042548 = product of:
      0.011521274 = sum of:
        0.011521274 = product of:
          0.03456382 = sum of:
            0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456382 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  19. (Sears') List of Subject Headings (1997) 0.00
    0.0023042548 = product of:
      0.011521274 = sum of:
        0.011521274 = product of:
          0.03456382 = sum of:
            0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456382 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vorgänger: 'List of Subject Headings for small libraries, compiled from lists used in nine representative small libraries', Ed.: M.E. Sears. - 1st ed. 1923. - 2nd ed. 1926. - 3rd ed. 1933. - 4th ed. 1939, Ed.: I.S. Monro. - 5th ed. 1944: 'Sears List of Subject Headings', Ed. I. S. Monro. - 6th ed. 1950, Ed.: B.M. Frick. - 7th ed. 1954 - 8th ed. 1959. - 'List of Subject Headings'. - 9th. ed. 1965, Ed.: B.M. Westby. - 10th ed. 1972. - 11th ed. 1977. - 12th ed. 1982. - 13th ed. 1986, Ed.: C. Rovira u. C. Reyes. - 14th ed. 1991. Ed. M.T. Mooney. - 15th ed. 1994, Ed.: J. Miller // Rez. 15th ed.: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)