Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lewandowski, D."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Lewandowski, D.: Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle, Stärkung "alternativer Suchmaschinen" : Suchmaschinen und Politik (2005) 0.01
    0.00655154 = product of:
      0.0327577 = sum of:
        0.0327577 = weight(_text_:den in 3374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0327577 = score(doc=3374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.31667316 = fieldWeight in 3374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3374)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Suchmaschinen sind in der Politik angekommen. Einerseits wurde eine Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle unter Beteiligung großerAnbietergegründet Andererseits beschäftigt sich die grüne Bundestagsfraktion mit der Frage, ob die bisher bestehende Suchmaschinen-Struktur die beste für den Nutzer sei.
  2. Lewandowski, D.: Nachweis deutschsprachiger bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlicher Aufsätze in Google Scholar (2007) 0.00
    0.0045860778 = product of:
      0.02293039 = sum of:
        0.02293039 = weight(_text_:den in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02293039 = score(doc=284,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.2216712 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In dieser Untersuchung werden die Aufsätze der Jahre 2004 bis 2006 aus den acht wichtigsten deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften des Bibliotheks- und Informationswesens auf ihre Verfügbarkeit in Google Scholar hin untersucht. Dabei zeigt sich, dass Google Scholar keinen vollständigen Nachweis der Artikel bieten kann und sich daher nicht als Ersatz für bibliographische Datenbanken eignet. Google Scholar macht einen Teil der Volltexte direkt verfügbar und eignet sich insofern für einen schnellen und problemlosen Zugang zum Volltext, der traditionelle Wege wie die Bibliothek bzw. die Fernleihe umgeht. Für das Fach Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft bietet Google Scholar insgesamt die Chance, seine Inhalte auch über die Fachgrenzen hinaus bekannt zu machen.
  3. Lewandowski, D.; Haustein, S.: What does the German-language information science community cite? (2015) 0.00
    0.004223162 = product of:
      0.021115808 = sum of:
        0.021115808 = product of:
          0.06334742 = sum of:
            0.06334742 = weight(_text_:f in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06334742 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  4. Lewandowski, D.; Kerkmann, F.; Rümmele, S.; Sünkler, S.: ¬An empirical investigation on search engine ad disclosure (2018) 0.00
    0.002956213 = product of:
      0.014781064 = sum of:
        0.014781064 = product of:
          0.044343192 = sum of:
            0.044343192 = weight(_text_:f in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044343192 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  5. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.; Kerkmann, F.: Are ads on Google search engine results pages labeled clearly enough? : the influence of knowledge on search ads on users' selection behaviour (2017) 0.00
    0.002111581 = product of:
      0.010557904 = sum of:
        0.010557904 = product of:
          0.03167371 = sum of:
            0.03167371 = weight(_text_:f in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03167371 = score(doc=3567,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  6. Lewandowski, D.; Spree, U.: Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited : fair ranking for reasonable quality? (2011) 0.00
    0.0016299331 = product of:
      0.008149666 = sum of:
        0.008149666 = product of:
          0.024448996 = sum of:
            0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024448996 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 9.2012 19:27:22
  7. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019) 0.00
    0.0016299331 = product of:
      0.008149666 = sum of:
        0.008149666 = product of:
          0.024448996 = sum of:
            0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024448996 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22