Search (154 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Information between Data and Knowledge : Information Science and its Neighbours from Data Science to Digital Humanities. Information zwischen Daten und Wissen. Die Informationswissenschaft und ihre Nachbarn von Data Science bis Digital Humanities. Proceedings to ISI 2021 (2021) 0.02
    0.02264742 = product of:
      0.05661855 = sum of:
        0.012669483 = product of:
          0.038008448 = sum of:
            0.038008448 = weight(_text_:f in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038008448 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.043949068 = weight(_text_:den in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043949068 = score(doc=171,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.4248616 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In ihrem Vorwort nehmen die Herausgeber Thomas Schmidt und Christian Wolff eine Art Vorbewertung der ISI 2021 vor. Mit zwei Jahren Verspätung ist das "16. Internationale Symposion für Informationswissenschaft" mitten in der Corona-Pandemie angekommen. Die nunmehr zwangsläufig virtuelle Konferenz hat immerhin den Vorteil, dass jedermann ohne Reisekosten teilnehmen kann (eine Registrierung vorausgesetzt). Die Herausgeber thematisieren im Besonderen "das Erstarken der digitalen Geisteswissenschaften in institutioneller, organisatorischer und personeller Hinsicht". Unter den "Kleinen Fächern" wachsen die digitalen Geisteswissenschaften mit am stärksten, was auch neue Konkurrenten für die Informationswissenschaft hervorbringt.
    Content
    Zu beziehen über https://shop.strato.de/epages/Store8.sf/?ObjectPath=/Shops/61236266/Products/978-3-86488-172-5 - https://www.amazon.de/dp/3864881722. Zum Download über https://files.mi.ur.de/f/b11233047d864a1d822b/?dl=1 .
    Footnote
    Vgl. den Beitrag: "Über die neue Datenseligkeit Probleme des Umgangs mit Information nicht in den Hintergrund rücken" Für den wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs einen "geschützten Raum" in Open Password Nr.897 vom 09.03.2021 unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzI2OSwiYTBjNTIwMGQ1YTc5IiwwLDAsMjM4LDFd.
  2. DeSilva, J.M.; Traniello, J.F.A.; Claxton, A.G.; Fannin, L.D.: When and why did human brains decrease in size? : a new change-point analysis and insights from brain evolution in ants (2021) 0.02
    0.018527497 = product of:
      0.03087916 = sum of:
        0.0063347416 = product of:
          0.019004224 = sum of:
            0.019004224 = weight(_text_:f in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019004224 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.13211139 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01965462 = weight(_text_:den in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01965462 = score(doc=405,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.19000389 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
        0.0048897993 = product of:
          0.014669397 = sum of:
            0.014669397 = weight(_text_:22 in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014669397 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Rötzer, F.: Warum schrumpft das Gehirn des Menschen seit ein paar Tausend Jahren? Unter: https://krass-und-konkret.de/wissenschaft-technik/warum-schrumpft-das-gehirn-des-menschen-seit-ein-paar-tausend-jahren/. "... seit einigen tausend Jahren - manche sagen seit 10.000 Jahren -, also nach dem Beginn der Landwirtschaft, der Sesshaftigkeit und der Stadtgründungen sowie der Erfindung der Schrift schrumpfte das menschliche Gehirn überraschenderweise wieder. ... Allgemein wird davon ausgegangen, dass mit den ersten Werkzeugen und vor allem beginnend mit der Erfindung der Schrift kognitive Funktionen, vor allem das Gedächtnis externalisiert wurden, allerdings um den Preis, neue Kapazitäten entwickeln zu müssen, beispielsweise Lesen und Schreiben. Gedächtnis beinhaltet individuelle Erfahrungen, aber auch kollektives Wissen, an dem alle Mitglieder einer Gemeinschaft mitwirken und in das das Wissen sowie die Erfahrungen der Vorfahren eingeschrieben sind. Im digitalen Zeitalter ist die Externalisierung und Entlastung der Gehirne noch sehr viel weitgehender, weil etwa mit KI nicht nur Wissensinhalte, sondern auch kognitive Fähigkeiten wie das Suchen, Sammeln, Analysieren und Auswerten von Informationen zur Entscheidungsfindung externalisiert werden, während die externalisierten Gehirne wie das Internet kollektiv in Echtzeit lernen und sich erweitern. Über Neuimplantate könnten schließlich Menschen direkt an die externalisierten Gehirne angeschlossen werden, aber auch direkt ihre kognitiven Kapazitäten erweitern, indem Prothesen, neue Sensoren oder Maschinen/Roboter auch in der Ferne in den ergänzten Körper der Gehirne aufgenommen werden.
    Die Wissenschaftler sehen diese Entwicklungen im Hintergrund, wollen aber über einen Vergleich mit der Hirnentwicklung bei Ameisen erklären, warum heutige Menschen kleinere Gehirne als ihre Vorfahren vor 100.000 Jahren entwickelt haben. Der Rückgang der Gehirngröße könnte, so die Hypothese, "aus der Externalisierung von Wissen und den Vorteilen der Entscheidungsfindung auf Gruppenebene resultieren, was zum Teil auf das Aufkommen sozialer Systeme der verteilten Kognition und der Speicherung und Weitergabe von Informationen zurückzuführen ist"."
    Source
    Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 22 October 2021 [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.742639/full]
  3. Sluis, F. van der; Broek, E.L. van den: Feedback beyond accuracy : using eye-tracking to detect comprehensibility and interest during reading (2023) 0.01
    0.012929643 = product of:
      0.032324106 = sum of:
        0.012669483 = product of:
          0.038008448 = sum of:
            0.038008448 = weight(_text_:f in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038008448 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01965462 = weight(_text_:den in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01965462 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.19000389 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  4. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.01
    0.011464337 = product of:
      0.057321683 = sum of:
        0.057321683 = product of:
          0.17196505 = sum of:
            0.17196505 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17196505 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30597782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  5. Marques Redigolo, F.; Lopes Fujita, M.S.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Guidelines for subject analysis in subject cataloging (2022) 0.01
    0.009015142 = product of:
      0.022537854 = sum of:
        0.012669483 = product of:
          0.038008448 = sum of:
            0.038008448 = weight(_text_:f in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038008448 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.00986837 = product of:
          0.029605111 = sum of:
            0.029605111 = weight(_text_:29 in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029605111 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2022 18:14:27
  6. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.01
    0.007859188 = product of:
      0.039295938 = sum of:
        0.039295938 = product of:
          0.058943905 = sum of:
            0.029605111 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029605111 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
            0.029338794 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029338794 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  7. Zhang, Y.; Wu, D.; Hagen, L.; Song, I.-Y.; Mostafa, J.; Oh, S.; Anderson, T.; Shah, C.; Bishop, B.W.; Hopfgartner, F.; Eckert, K.; Federer, L.; Saltz, J.S.: Data science curriculum in the iField (2023) 0.01
    0.007512619 = product of:
      0.018781547 = sum of:
        0.010557904 = product of:
          0.03167371 = sum of:
            0.03167371 = weight(_text_:f in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03167371 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008223643 = product of:
          0.024670927 = sum of:
            0.024670927 = weight(_text_:29 in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024670927 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    12. 5.2023 14:29:42
  8. Laparra, E.; Binford-Walsh, A.; Emerson, K.; Miller, M.L.; López-Hoffman, L.; Currim, F.; Bethard, S.: Addressing structural hurdles for metadata extraction from environmental impact statements (2023) 0.01
    0.007512619 = product of:
      0.018781547 = sum of:
        0.010557904 = product of:
          0.03167371 = sum of:
            0.03167371 = weight(_text_:f in 1042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03167371 = score(doc=1042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1042)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008223643 = product of:
          0.024670927 = sum of:
            0.024670927 = weight(_text_:29 in 1042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024670927 = score(doc=1042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1042)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2023 19:21:01
  9. Yang, F.; Zhang, X.: Focal fields in literature on the information divide : the USA, China, UK and India (2020) 0.01
    0.007483028 = product of:
      0.01870757 = sum of:
        0.010557904 = product of:
          0.03167371 = sum of:
            0.03167371 = weight(_text_:f in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03167371 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008149666 = product of:
          0.024448996 = sum of:
            0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024448996 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    13. 2.2020 18:22:13
  10. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.01
    0.007483028 = product of:
      0.01870757 = sum of:
        0.010557904 = product of:
          0.03167371 = sum of:
            0.03167371 = weight(_text_:f in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03167371 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008149666 = product of:
          0.024448996 = sum of:
            0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024448996 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  11. Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023) 0.01
    0.007483028 = product of:
      0.01870757 = sum of:
        0.010557904 = product of:
          0.03167371 = sum of:
            0.03167371 = weight(_text_:f in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03167371 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008149666 = product of:
          0.024448996 = sum of:
            0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024448996 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:07:22
  12. Guo, T.; Bai, X.; Zhen, S.; Abid, S.; Xia, F.: Lost at starting line : predicting maladaptation of university freshmen based on educational big data (2023) 0.01
    0.007483028 = product of:
      0.01870757 = sum of:
        0.010557904 = product of:
          0.03167371 = sum of:
            0.03167371 = weight(_text_:f in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03167371 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008149666 = product of:
          0.024448996 = sum of:
            0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024448996 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    27.12.2022 18:34:22
  13. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01
    0.0065493234 = product of:
      0.032746617 = sum of:
        0.032746617 = product of:
          0.049119923 = sum of:
            0.024670927 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024670927 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024448996 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  14. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01
    0.0065493234 = product of:
      0.032746617 = sum of:
        0.032746617 = product of:
          0.049119923 = sum of:
            0.024670927 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024670927 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
            0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024448996 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  15. Patriarca, S.: Information literacy gives us the tools to check sources and to verify factual statements : What does Popper`s "Es gibt keine Autoritäten" mean? (2021) 0.00
    0.00327577 = product of:
      0.01637885 = sum of:
        0.01637885 = weight(_text_:den in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01637885 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15833658 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Zu: Bernd Jörs, Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft und Kritischer Rationalismus - Gegen die Selbstüberschätzung der Vertreter der "Informationskompetenz" eine Rückkehr zu Karl R. Popper geboten, in: Open Password, 30 August - Herbert Huemer, Informationskompetenz als Kompetenz für lebenslanges Lernen, in: Open Password, #965, 25. August 2021 - Huemer nahm auf den Beitrag von Bernd Jörs "Wie sich "Informationskompetenz" methodisch-operativ untersuchen lässt" in Open Password am 20. August 2021 Bezug.
  16. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.00
    0.0032598663 = product of:
      0.016299332 = sum of:
        0.016299332 = product of:
          0.048897993 = sum of:
            0.048897993 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048897993 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
  17. Peset, F.; Garzón-Farinós, F.; González, L.M.; García-Massó, X.; Ferrer-Sapena, A.; Toca-Herrera, J.L.; Sánchez-Pérez, E.A.: Survival analysis of author keywords : an application to the library and information sciences area (2020) 0.00
    0.002986226 = product of:
      0.01493113 = sum of:
        0.01493113 = product of:
          0.04479339 = sum of:
            0.04479339 = weight(_text_:f in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04479339 = score(doc=5774,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  18. Frey, J.; Streitmatter, D.; Götz, F.; Hellmann, S.; Arndt, N.: DBpedia Archivo : a Web-Scale interface for ontology archiving under consumer-oriented aspects (2020) 0.00
    0.002956213 = product of:
      0.014781064 = sum of:
        0.014781064 = product of:
          0.044343192 = sum of:
            0.044343192 = weight(_text_:f in 52) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044343192 = score(doc=52,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 52, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=52)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  19. Skare, R.: Paratext (2020) 0.00
    0.0026315656 = product of:
      0.013157828 = sum of:
        0.013157828 = product of:
          0.03947348 = sum of:
            0.03947348 = weight(_text_:29 in 20) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03947348 = score(doc=20,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 20, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=20)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    31.10.2020 18:51:29
  20. Shieh, J.: PCC's work on URIs in MARC (2020) 0.00
    0.0026315656 = product of:
      0.013157828 = sum of:
        0.013157828 = product of:
          0.03947348 = sum of:
            0.03947348 = weight(_text_:29 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03947348 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 2.2021 18:29:15

Languages

Types

  • a 147
  • el 10
  • m 4
  • p 3
  • s 1
  • More… Less…