Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Octavio, A.: ¬The '¬indexed' theorem (1996) 0.01 
    0.007861848 = product of:
  0.03930924 = sum of:
    0.03930924 = weight(_text_:den in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03930924 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036090754 = queryNorm
        0.38000777 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Leserbrief von S. Göbel in: Mathematical intelligencer 19(1997) no.3, S.5-6
  2. Göbel, S.: Aspekte der Mathematikliteratur : Untersuchungen in verschiedenen Datenbanken (1997) 0.01 
    0.0074122213 = product of:
  0.037061106 = sum of:
    0.037061106 = weight(_text_:den in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037061106 = score(doc=2166,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036090754 = queryNorm
        0.35827476 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Literaturdatenbanken wurden eigentlich mit zwei Zielen aufgebaut: einerseits Fachliteratur zu archivieren und zu dokumentieren und andererseits die Literaturhinweise den Wissenschaftlern für Recherchen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Aus diesen gespeicherten Datenmengen kann man baer auch allgemeine Erkenntnisse über die Literatur eines Fachgebietes und das Verhalten der Forscher gewinnen. Vor allem seit den sechziger Jahren, seit dem Aufbau des Science Citation Index - in dem man auch nach zitierten Arbeiten suchen kann - gibt es eine Fülle von informationswisenschaftlichen und wissenssoziologischen Untersuchungen mit Datenbanken
  3. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation mittels Datenbanken : methodisch einwandfrei? (1995) 0.01 
    0.00655154 = product of:
  0.0327577 = sum of:
    0.0327577 = weight(_text_:den in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0327577 = score(doc=2443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036090754 = queryNorm
        0.31667316 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Als Maß für die Produktivität und den Einfluß von Forschern, wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen und Fachbereichen dienen häufig anhand von Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen erstellte Ranglisten. Doch nach welchen Kriterien sind die in elektronischen Fachdatenbanken gespeicherten Informationen auszuwerten, um ein einigermaßen zutreffendes Abbild der Forschungsleistung zu erhalten?
  4. Schlaffer, H.: Selbstzitat (1997) 0.01 
    0.00655154 = product of:
  0.0327577 = sum of:
    0.0327577 = weight(_text_:den in 7464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0327577 = score(doc=7464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036090754 = queryNorm
        0.31667316 = fieldWeight in 7464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7464)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    'Zwischenruf' zur Zitierpraxis im Wissenschaftsbereich: "Jeder kann seine Plazierung auf dieser Weltrangliste gelehrter Eitelkeit verbessern, indem er sich so oft und andere so wenig wie möglich zitiert. Die Verbreitung des Ruhms, den man braucht, nimmt man am besten selbst in die Hand, von Jugend an"
  5. Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996) 0.01 
    0.006485694 = product of:
  0.03242847 = sum of:
    0.03242847 = weight(_text_:den in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03242847 = score(doc=6110,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036090754 = queryNorm
        0.31349042 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In einer früheren Studie wurde bereits der 'informationelle Mehrwert' von bibliographischen Datenbanken durch bibliometrische Nutzung untersucht. Im folgenden soll nun eine visuelle Oberfläche vorgestellt werden, die mit Hilfe einer bibliometrischen 'Sekundärdatenbank' einerseits die Nutzungsmöglichkeiten der zugrundeliegenden bibliographischen Datenbanken vor allem in den Bereichen Wissenschaftsinformation, Forschungsevaluation und Wissenschaftspolitik erweitern soll, andererseits aber auch eine Rückkopplung zu den Aufgaben des traditionellen Retrievals erlaubt. Die visuelle Oberfläche 'Visual Bibliometrics' ist eine Erweiterung des CD-Edition des 'Science Citation Index' und des 'Social Science Citation Index'
  6. Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996) 0.01 
    0.005241232 = product of:
  0.02620616 = sum of:
    0.02620616 = weight(_text_:den in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620616 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036090754 = queryNorm
        0.25333852 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Ein überfordertes Gutachter-System, knapper fließende Forschungsgelder sowie die starke Faszination von Ranglisten bewirken zunehmend den Einsatz bibliometrischer Methoden zur Messung von Forschungsqualität. Grundlage der meisten Bewertungen ist der Science Citation Index, der nun auch in der Version als Online-Datenbank für umfangreiche Analysen genutzt werden kann. Erweiterungen der Retrievalsprache beim Host STN International ermöglichen statistische Analysen, die bisher nur dem SCI-Hersteller und wenigen Spezialisten vorbehalten waren. Voraussetzung für eine sinnvolle Anwendung sind vor allem die Wahl geeigneter Selektionskriterien sowie die sorgfältige Interpretation der Ergebnisse im Rahmen der Grenzen dieser Methoden
  7. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.01 
    0.005215786 = product of:
  0.02607893 = sum of:
    0.02607893 = product of:
      0.07823679 = sum of:
        0.07823679 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07823679 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  8. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature II (1996) 0.00 
    0.003378529 = product of:
  0.016892646 = sum of:
    0.016892646 = product of:
      0.050677933 = sum of:
        0.050677933 = weight(_text_:f in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050677933 = score(doc=7105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  9. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature I (1996) 0.00 
    0.003378529 = product of:
  0.016892646 = sum of:
    0.016892646 = product of:
      0.050677933 = sum of:
        0.050677933 = weight(_text_:f in 7170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050677933 = score(doc=7170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7170)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  10. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.00 
    0.0032894572 = product of:
  0.016447285 = sum of:
    0.016447285 = product of:
      0.049341854 = sum of:
        0.049341854 = weight(_text_:29 in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049341854 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:19:32
  11. Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993) 0.00 
    0.0026315656 = product of:
  0.013157828 = sum of:
    0.013157828 = product of:
      0.03947348 = sum of:
        0.03947348 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03947348 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
  12. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.00 
    0.0019559197 = product of:
  0.009779599 = sum of:
    0.009779599 = product of:
      0.029338794 = sum of:
        0.029338794 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029338794 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  13. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.00 
    0.0019559197 = product of:
  0.009779599 = sum of:
    0.009779599 = product of:
      0.029338794 = sum of:
        0.029338794 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029338794 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 12
  • m 1

Themes