Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Vogt, F.: Formale Begriffsanalyse mit C++ : Datenstrukturen und Algorithmen (1996) 0.02
    0.02491322 = product of:
      0.062283047 = sum of:
        0.016892646 = product of:
          0.050677933 = sum of:
            0.050677933 = weight(_text_:f in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050677933 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0453904 = weight(_text_:den in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0453904 = score(doc=2037,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.43879518 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Das Buch soll den Leser, der an Formaler Begriffsnalyse als Methode der Datenanalyse und Wissensstrukturierung interssiert ist, in die Lage versetzen, eigene C++-Programme zur Formalen Begriffsanalyse zu schreiben. Die Vorgehensweise der Formalen Begriffsanalyse werden an einem Anwendungsbeispiel erläutert, so daß das Buch sowohl als Leitfaden für den interessierten Neueinsteiger als auch als Handbuch für den versierten Anwendungsprogrammierer und Projektleiter dienen kann
  2. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.01
    0.011972845 = product of:
      0.029932112 = sum of:
        0.016892646 = product of:
          0.050677933 = sum of:
            0.050677933 = weight(_text_:f in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050677933 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.013039465 = product of:
          0.039118394 = sum of:
            0.039118394 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039118394 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
  3. Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung : Methoden und Anwendungen. Mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler (2000) 0.01
    0.010774702 = product of:
      0.026936755 = sum of:
        0.010557904 = product of:
          0.03167371 = sum of:
            0.03167371 = weight(_text_:f in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03167371 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01637885 = weight(_text_:den in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01637885 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15833658 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Dieses Buch stellt Methoden der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung vor und präsentiert Anwendungen aus unterschiedlichen Praxisfeldern. Im Methodenteil wird in moderne Techniken der Begrifflichen Datenanalyse und Wissensverarbeitung eingeführt. Der zweite Teil richtet sich verstärkt an potentielle Anwender. An ausgewählten Anwendungen wird die Vorgehensweise bei der Datenanalyse und dem Information Retrieval mit den Methoden der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung vorgestellt und ihr Potential aufgezeigt
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: GANTER, B.: Begriffe und Implikationen; BURMEISTER, P.: ConImp: Ein Programm zur Fromalen Begriffsanalyse; Lengnink, K.: Ähnlichkeit als Distanz in Begriffsverbänden; POLLANDT, S.: Datenanalyse mit Fuzzy-Begriffen; PREDIGER, S.: Terminologische Merkmalslogik in der Formalen Begriffsanalyse; WILLE, R. u. M. ZICKWOLFF: Grundlagen einer Triadischen Begriffsanalyse; LINDIG, C. u. G. SNELTING: Formale Begriffsanalyse im Software Engineering; STRACK, H. u. M. SKORSKY: Zugriffskontrolle bei Programmsystemen und im Datenschutz mittels Formaler Begriffsanalyse; ANDELFINGER, U.: Inhaltliche Erschließung des Bereichs 'Sozialorientierte Gestaltung von Informationstechnik': Ein begriffsanalytischer Ansatz; GÖDERT, W.: Wissensdarstellung in Informationssystemen, Fragetypen und Anforderungen an Retrievalkomponenten; ROCK, T. u. R. WILLE: Ein TOSCANA-Erkundungssystem zur Literatursuche; ESCHENFELDER, D. u.a.: Ein Erkundungssystem zum Baurecht: Methoden der Entwicklung eines TOSCANA-Systems; GROßKOPF, A. u. G. HARRAS: Begriffliche Erkundung semantischer Strukturen von Sprechaktverben; ZELGER, J.: Grundwerte, Ziele und Maßnahmen in einem regionalen Krankenhaus: Eine Anwendung des Verfahrens GABEK; KOHLER-KOCH, B. u. F. VOGT: Normen- und regelgeleitete internationale Kooperationen: Formale Begriffsanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft; HENNING, H.J. u. W. KEMMNITZ: Entwicklung eines kontextuellen Methodenkonzeptes mit Hilfer der Formalen Begriffsanalyse an Beispielen zum Risikoverständnis; BARTEL, H.-G.: Über Möglichkeiten der Formalen Begriffsanalyse in der Mathematischen Archäochemie
  4. Vogt, C.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse : Darstellung und Analyse von bibliographischen Daten (1994) 0.01
    0.0091721555 = product of:
      0.04586078 = sum of:
        0.04586078 = weight(_text_:den in 7603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04586078 = score(doc=7603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.4433424 = fieldWeight in 7603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7603)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Informations- und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften: Beiträge zur Umsetzung neuer Informationstechnologien. Hrsg.: H. Best u.a
  5. Wille, R.; Wachter, C.: Begriffsanalyse von Dokumenten (1992) 0.01
    0.007861848 = product of:
      0.03930924 = sum of:
        0.03930924 = weight(_text_:den in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03930924 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.38000777 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  6. Helmerich, M.: Liniendiagramme in der Wissenskommunikation : eine mathematisch-didaktische Untersuchung (2011) 0.01
    0.00655154 = product of:
      0.0327577 = sum of:
        0.0327577 = weight(_text_:den in 4390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0327577 = score(doc=4390,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.31667316 = fieldWeight in 4390, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4390)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Kommunikation von Wissen nimmt in der modernen Wissensgesellschaft einen entscheidenden Stellenwert ein. Kommunikation im Habermas'schen Sinne eines intersubjektiven Verständigungsprozesses ist dann aber auch mehr als nur der Austausch von Zeichen: es geht um Sinn und Bedeutung und die Aushandlungsprozesse darüber, wie wir als Kommunikationsgemeinschaft Zeichen interpretieren und darin Informationen codieren. Als Medium für solche Kommunikations - prozesse eignen sich besonders gut Liniendiagramme aus der Theorie der Formalen Begriffsanalyse. Diese Liniendiagramme sind nicht nur geeignet, die Wissenskommunikation zu unterstützen, sondern auch Kommunikationsprozesse überhaupt erst zu initiieren. Solche Liniendiagramme können die Wissenskommunikation gut unterstützen, da sie durch ihre Einfachheit, Ordnung, Prägnanz und ergänzende Stimulanz für Verständigung über die wissensgenerierende Information sorgen. Außerdem wird mit den Liniendiagrammen ein Kommunikationsmittel bereitgestellt, dass inter- und transdisziplinär wirksam werden kann und so Wissensgebiete für verschiedene Disziplinen erschließt, da es mit den Diagrammen gelingt, die allgemeine, zugrundeliegende logische Struktur mit Hilfe eines mathematisch fundierten Verfahrens herauszuarbeiten. Liniendiagramme stellen nicht nur Wissensgebiete in einer geordneten, strukturierten Form dar, sondern verwenden dafür auch formale Begriffe und knüpfen damit an Begriffe als Objekte des menschlichen Denkens an. In den Begriffe verschmilzt ein Ausschnitt der betrachteten Objekte (im Beispiel die verschiedenen Gewässerarten) mit den ihnen gemeinsamen Merkmalen zu neuen Denkeinheiten und geben somit dem Wissen eine Form, in der Kommunikation über diese Denkeinheiten und die darin konzentrierte Information ermöglicht wird.
  7. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung in der Wirtschaft (2002) 0.01
    0.006485694 = product of:
      0.03242847 = sum of:
        0.03242847 = weight(_text_:den in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03242847 = score(doc=547,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.31349042 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung ist einem pragmatischen Wissensverständnis verpflichtet, nach dem menschliches Wissen in einem offenen Prozess menschlichen Denkens, Argumentierens und Kommunizierens entsteht und weiterlebt. Sie gründet sich auf eine mathematische Begriffstheorie, die auf das wechselseitige Zusammenwirken von Formalem und Inhaltlichem ausgerichtet ist. Wie diese theoretische Konzeption in der wirtschaftlichen Praxis zur Wirkung kommt wird erläutert anhand der Kernprozesse des organisationalen Wissensmanagements, d.h. nach G. Probst et al. anhand von Wissensidentifikation, Wissenserwerb, Wissensentwicklung, Wissens(ver)teilung, Wissensnutzung und Wissensbewahrung; jeweils an einem Beispiel wird der Einsatz spezifischer Methoden der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung demonstriert. Abschließend wird auf den prozesshaften Wirkungszusammenhang von Wissenszielen und Wissensbewertungen mit den Kernprozessen aus Sicht der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung eingegangen.
  8. Ganter, B.; Wille, R.: Conceptual scaling (1989) 0.01
    0.005912426 = product of:
      0.029562129 = sum of:
        0.029562129 = product of:
          0.088686384 = sum of:
            0.088686384 = weight(_text_:f in 3138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088686384 = score(doc=3138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 3138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3138)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Applications of combinatorics and graph theory to the biological and social sciences. Ed.: F. Roberts
  9. Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Data analysis based on a conceptual file (1991) 0.01
    0.005912426 = product of:
      0.029562129 = sum of:
        0.029562129 = product of:
          0.088686384 = sum of:
            0.088686384 = weight(_text_:f in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088686384 = score(doc=3140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  10. Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1992) 0.01
    0.005912426 = product of:
      0.029562129 = sum of:
        0.029562129 = product of:
          0.088686384 = sum of:
            0.088686384 = weight(_text_:f in 3147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088686384 = score(doc=3147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 3147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3147)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.01
    0.005912426 = product of:
      0.029562129 = sum of:
        0.029562129 = product of:
          0.088686384 = sum of:
            0.088686384 = weight(_text_:f in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088686384 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis in information science (2006) 0.01
    0.005263131 = product of:
      0.026315656 = sum of:
        0.026315656 = product of:
          0.07894696 = sum of:
            0.07894696 = weight(_text_:29 in 4305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07894696 = score(doc=4305,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4305, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4305)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:29:59
  13. Kollewe, W.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - ein Werkzeug zur begrifflichen Analyse und Erkundung von Daten (1994) 0.01
    0.005067793 = product of:
      0.025338966 = sum of:
        0.025338966 = product of:
          0.076016895 = sum of:
            0.076016895 = weight(_text_:f in 8942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076016895 = score(doc=8942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 8942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8942)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  14. Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1993) 0.01
    0.005067793 = product of:
      0.025338966 = sum of:
        0.025338966 = product of:
          0.076016895 = sum of:
            0.076016895 = weight(_text_:f in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076016895 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Kohler-Koch, B.; Vogt, F.: Normen- und regelgeleitete internationale Kooperationen : Formale Begriffsanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft (2000) 0.01
    0.005067793 = product of:
      0.025338966 = sum of:
        0.025338966 = product of:
          0.076016895 = sum of:
            0.076016895 = weight(_text_:f in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076016895 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  16. Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998) 0.00
    0.0032598663 = product of:
      0.016299332 = sum of:
        0.016299332 = product of:
          0.048897993 = sum of:
            0.048897993 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048897993 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 15:58:22
  17. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.00
    0.0022819063 = product of:
      0.011409531 = sum of:
        0.011409531 = product of:
          0.034228593 = sum of:
            0.034228593 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034228593 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
  18. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.00
    0.0022819063 = product of:
      0.011409531 = sum of:
        0.011409531 = product of:
          0.034228593 = sum of:
            0.034228593 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034228593 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  19. Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.00
    0.0017917355 = product of:
      0.008958678 = sum of:
        0.008958678 = product of:
          0.026876032 = sum of:
            0.026876032 = weight(_text_:f in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026876032 = score(doc=691,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.18683371 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Concepts and Language: The Role of Conceptual Structure in Human Evolution (Keith Devlin) - Concepts in Linguistics - Concepts in Natural Language (Gisela Harras) - Patterns, Schemata, and Types: Author Support through Formalized Experience (Felix H. Gatzemeier) - Conventions and Notations for Knowledge Representation and Retrieval (Philippe Martin) - Conceptual Ontology: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics (John F. Sowa) - Pragmatically Yours (Mary Keeler) - Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments (Deborah L. McGuinness) - Discovery of Class Relations in Exception Structured Knowledge Bases (Hendra Suryanto, Paul Compton) - Conceptual Graphs: Perspectives: CGs Applications: Where Are We 7 Years after the First ICCS ? (Michel Chein, David Genest) - The Engineering of a CC-Based System: Fundamental Issues (Guy W. Mineau) - Conceptual Graphs, Metamodeling, and Notation of Concepts (Olivier Gerbé, Guy W. Mineau, Rudolf K. Keller) - Knowledge Representation and Reasonings: Based on Graph Homomorphism (Marie-Laure Mugnier) - User Modeling Using Conceptual Graphs for Intelligent Agents (James F. Baldwin, Trevor P. Martin, Aimilia Tzanavari) - Towards a Unified Querying System of Both Structured and Semi-structured Imprecise Data Using Fuzzy View (Patrice Buche, Ollivier Haemmerlé) - Formal Semantics of Conceptual Structures: The Extensional Semantics of the Conceptual Graph Formalism (Guy W. Mineau) - Semantics of Attribute Relations in Conceptual Graphs (Pavel Kocura) - Nested Concept Graphs and Triadic Power Context Families (Susanne Prediger) - Negations in Simple Concept Graphs (Frithjof Dau) - Extending the CG Model by Simulations (Jean-François Baget) - Contextual Logic and Formal Concept Analysis: Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases: Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis (Franz Baader, Ralf Molitor) - On the Contextual Logic of Ordinal Data (Silke Pollandt, Rudolf Wille) - Boolean Concept Logic (Rudolf Wille) - Lattices of Triadic Concept Graphs (Bernd Groh, Rudolf Wille) - Formalizing Hypotheses with Concepts (Bernhard Ganter, Sergei 0. Kuznetsov) - Generalized Formal Concept Analysis (Laurent Chaudron, Nicolas Maille) - A Logical Generalization of Formal Concept Analysis (Sébastien Ferré, Olivier Ridoux) - On the Treatment of Incomplete Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis (Peter Burmeister, Richard Holzer) - Conceptual Structures in Practice: Logic-Based Networks: Concept Graphs and Conceptual Structures (Peter W. Eklund) - Conceptual Knowledge Discovery and Data Analysis (Joachim Hereth, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille, Uta Wille) - CEM - A Conceptual Email Manager (Richard Cole, Gerd Stumme) - A Contextual-Logic Extension of TOSCANA (Peter Eklund, Bernd Groh, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille) - A Conceptual Graph Model for W3C Resource Description Framework (Olivier Corby, Rose Dieng, Cédric Hébert) - Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures: Computing with Conceptual Structures (Bernhard Ganter) - Symmetry and the Computation of Conceptual Structures (Robert Levinson) An Introduction to SNePS 3 (Stuart C. Shapiro) - Composition Norm Dynamics Calculation with Conceptual Graphs (Aldo de Moor) - From PROLOG++ to PROLOG+CG: A CG Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language (Adil Kabbaj, Martin Janta-Polczynski) - A Cost-Bounded Algorithm to Control Events Generalization (Gaël de Chalendar, Brigitte Grau, Olivier Ferret)
  20. Negm, E.; AbdelRahman, S.; Bahgat, R.: PREFCA: a portal retrieval engine based on formal concept analysis (2017) 0.00
    0.0016892646 = product of:
      0.008446323 = sum of:
        0.008446323 = product of:
          0.025338966 = sum of:
            0.025338966 = weight(_text_:f in 3291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025338966 = score(doc=3291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036090754 = queryNorm
                0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 3291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3291)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The web is a network of linked sites whereby each site either forms a physical portal or a standalone page. In the former case, the portal presents an access point to its embedded web pages that coherently present a specific topic. In the latter case, there are millions of standalone web pages, that are scattered throughout the web, having the same topic and could be conceptually linked together to form virtual portals. Search engines have been developed to help users in reaching the adequate pages in an efficient and effective manner. All the known current search engine techniques rely on the web page as the basic atomic search unit. They ignore the conceptual links, that reveal the implicit web related meanings, among the retrieved pages. However, building a semantic model for the whole portal may contain more semantic information than a model of scattered individual pages. In addition, user queries can be poor and contain imprecise terms that do not reflect the real user intention. Consequently, retrieving the standalone individual pages that are directly related to the query may not satisfy the user's need. In this paper, we propose PREFCA, a Portal Retrieval Engine based on Formal Concept Analysis that relies on the portal as the main search unit. PREFCA consists of three phases: First, the information extraction phase that is concerned with extracting portal's semantic data. Second, the formal concept analysis phase that utilizes formal concept analysis to discover the conceptual links among portal and attributes. Finally, the information retrieval phase where we propose a portal ranking method to retrieve ranked pairs of portals and embedded pages. Additionally, we apply the network analysis rules to output some portal characteristics. We evaluated PREFCA using two data sets, namely the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation 2010 and ClueWeb09 (category B) test data, for physical and virtual portals respectively. PREFCA proves higher F-measure accuracy, better Mean Average Precision ranking and comparable network analysis and efficiency results than other search engine approaches, namely Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), and BM25 techniques. As well, it gains high Mean Average Precision in comparison with learning to rank techniques. Moreover, PREFCA also gains better reach time than Carrot as a well-known topic-based search engine.