-
Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998)
0.02
0.015745595 = product of:
0.039363988 = sum of:
0.02620616 = weight(_text_:den in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02620616 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.25333852 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.013157828 = product of:
0.03947348 = sum of:
0.03947348 = weight(_text_:29 in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03947348 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Für eine fiktive Dokumentmenge wird eine Dokument-Wort-Matrix erstellt und mittels zweier Suchanfragen, ebenfalls als Matrix dargestellt, die Retrievalergebnisse ermittelt. Den Wörtern der Dokumentmenge werden in einem zweiten Schritt Aspekte zugeordnet und die Untersuchung erneut durchgeführt. Ein Vergleich bestätigt die schon früher gefundenen Vorteile des aspektischen Indexierung gegenüber anderen Methoden der Retrievalverbesserung, wie Trunkierung und Controlled Terms
- Date
- 4. 1.1999 19:31:29
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.011972845 = product of:
0.029932112 = sum of:
0.016892646 = product of:
0.050677933 = sum of:
0.050677933 = weight(_text_:f in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050677933 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.013039465 = product of:
0.039118394 = sum of:
0.039118394 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039118394 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Chen, X.: Indexing consistency between online catalogues (2008)
0.01
0.00655154 = product of:
0.0327577 = sum of:
0.0327577 = weight(_text_:den in 2209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0327577 = score(doc=2209,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.31667316 = fieldWeight in 2209, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2209)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In der globalen Online-Umgebung stellen viele bibliographische Dienstleistungen integrierten Zugang zu unterschiedlichen internetbasierten OPACs zur Verfügung. In solch einer Umgebung erwarten Benutzer mehr Übereinstimmungen innerhalb und zwischen den Systemen zu sehen. Zweck dieser Studie ist, die Indexierungskonsistenz zwischen Systemen zu untersuchen. Währenddessen werden einige Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen können, untersucht. Wichtigstes Ziel dieser Studie ist, die Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen herauszufinden, damit sinnvolle Vorschläge gemacht werden können, um die Indexierungskonsistenz zu verbessern. Eine Auswahl von 3307 Monographien wurde aus zwei chinesischen bibliographischen Katalogen gewählt. Nach Hooper's Formel war die durchschnittliche Indexierungskonsistenz für Indexterme 64,2% und für Klassennummern 61,6%. Nach Rolling's Formel war sie für Indexterme 70,7% und für Klassennummern 63,4%. Mehrere Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen, wurden untersucht: (1) Indexierungsbereite; (2) Indexierungsspezifizität; (3) Länge der Monographien; (4) Kategorie der Indexierungssprache; (5) Sachgebiet der Monographien; (6) Entwicklung von Disziplinen; (7) Struktur des Thesaurus oder der Klassifikation; (8) Erscheinungsjahr. Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen wurden ebenfalls analysiert. Die Analyse ergab: (1) den Indexieren mangelt es an Fachwissen, Vertrautheit mit den Indexierungssprachen und den Indexierungsregeln, so dass viele Inkonsistenzen verursacht wurden; (2) der Mangel an vereinheitlichten oder präzisen Regeln brachte ebenfalls Inkonsistenzen hervor; (3) verzögerte Überarbeitungen der Indexierungssprachen, Mangel an terminologischer Kontrolle, zu wenige Erläuterungen und "siehe auch" Referenzen, sowie die hohe semantische Freiheit bei der Auswahl von Deskriptoren oder Klassen, verursachten Inkonsistenzen.
-
Gretz, M.; Thomas, M.: Indexierungen in biomedizinischen Literaturdatenbanken : eine vergleichende Analyse (1991)
0.00
0.0045860778 = product of:
0.02293039 = sum of:
0.02293039 = weight(_text_:den in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02293039 = score(doc=5104,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.2216712 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Auf der Grundlage von vier Originaldokumenten, d.h. dokumentarischen Bezugseinheiten (DBEs), wird die Indexierung in vier biomedizinischen Online-Datenbanken (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS PREVIEWS, SCISEARCH) analysiert. Anhand von Beispielen werden inahltliche Erschließung, Indexierungstiefe, Indexierungsbreite, Indexierungskonsistenz, Präzision (durch syntaktisches Indexieren, Gewichtung, Proximity Operatoren) und Wiederauffindbarkeit (Recall) der in den Datenbanken gespeicherten Dokumentationseinheien (DBEs) untersucht. Die zeitaufwendigere intellektuelle Indexierung bei MEDLINE und EMBASE erweist sich als wesentlich präziser als die schneller verfügbare maschinelle Zuteilung von Deskriptoren in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH. In Teil 1 der Untersuchung werden die Indexierungen in MEDLINE und EMBASE, in Teil 2 die Deskriptorenzuteilungen in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH verglichen
-
Losee, R.: ¬A performance model of the length and number of subject headings and index phrases (2004)
0.00
0.003930924 = product of:
0.01965462 = sum of:
0.01965462 = weight(_text_:den in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01965462 = score(doc=3725,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.19000389 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Die Aussagen dieses Beitrages könnten einmal mit den RSWK in Verbindung gebracht werden
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.00
0.0039118393 = product of:
0.019559197 = sum of:
0.019559197 = product of:
0.058677588 = sum of:
0.058677588 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058677588 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Evedove, P.R. Dal; Evedove Tartarotti, R.C. Dal; Lopes Fujita, M.S.: Verbal protocols in Brazilian information science : a perspective from indexing studies (2018)
0.00
0.003378529 = product of:
0.016892646 = sum of:
0.016892646 = product of:
0.050677933 = sum of:
0.050677933 = weight(_text_:f in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050677933 = score(doc=4783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Peset, F.; Garzón-Farinós, F.; González, L.M.; García-Massó, X.; Ferrer-Sapena, A.; Toca-Herrera, J.L.; Sánchez-Pérez, E.A.: Survival analysis of author keywords : an application to the library and information sciences area (2020)
0.00
0.002986226 = product of:
0.01493113 = sum of:
0.01493113 = product of:
0.04479339 = sum of:
0.04479339 = weight(_text_:f in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04479339 = score(doc=5774,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Chartron, G.; Dalbin, S.; Monteil, M.-G.; Verillon, M.: Indexation manuelle et indexation automatique : dépasser les oppositions (1989)
0.00
0.002956213 = product of:
0.014781064 = sum of:
0.014781064 = product of:
0.044343192 = sum of:
0.044343192 = weight(_text_:f in 3516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044343192 = score(doc=3516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 3516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3516)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Language
- f
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.00
0.0026197291 = product of:
0.013098646 = sum of:
0.013098646 = product of:
0.019647969 = sum of:
0.00986837 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00986837 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.009779599 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009779599 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Footnote
- Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.00
0.0022819063 = product of:
0.011409531 = sum of:
0.011409531 = product of:
0.034228593 = sum of:
0.034228593 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034228593 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.00
0.0022819063 = product of:
0.011409531 = sum of:
0.011409531 = product of:
0.034228593 = sum of:
0.034228593 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034228593 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Iivonen, M.; Kivimäki, K.: Common entities and missing properties : similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts (1998)
0.00
0.0019736742 = product of:
0.00986837 = sum of:
0.00986837 = product of:
0.029605111 = sum of:
0.029605111 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029605111 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 24. 2.1999 21:29:51
-
Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004)
0.00
0.0019736742 = product of:
0.00986837 = sum of:
0.00986837 = product of:
0.029605111 = sum of:
0.029605111 = weight(_text_:29 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029605111 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 16:17:19
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.00
0.0019559197 = product of:
0.009779599 = sum of:
0.009779599 = product of:
0.029338794 = sum of:
0.029338794 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029338794 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.00
0.0019559197 = product of:
0.009779599 = sum of:
0.009779599 = product of:
0.029338794 = sum of:
0.029338794 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029338794 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990)
0.00
0.0016447286 = product of:
0.008223643 = sum of:
0.008223643 = product of:
0.024670927 = sum of:
0.024670927 = weight(_text_:29 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024670927 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 23.11.1995 11:29:46
-
Ansari, M.: Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses (2005)
0.00
0.0016447286 = product of:
0.008223643 = sum of:
0.008223643 = product of:
0.024670927 = sum of:
0.024670927 = weight(_text_:29 in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024670927 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 3.12.2005 19:38:29
-
Lee, D.H.; Schleyer, T.: Social tagging is no substitute for controlled indexing : a comparison of Medical Subject Headings and CiteULike tags assigned to 231,388 papers (2012)
0.00
0.0016447286 = product of:
0.008223643 = sum of:
0.008223643 = product of:
0.024670927 = sum of:
0.024670927 = weight(_text_:29 in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024670927 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 26. 8.2012 14:29:37
-
Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006)
0.00
0.0016299331 = product of:
0.008149666 = sum of:
0.008149666 = product of:
0.024448996 = sum of:
0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024448996 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
