-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021)
0.02
0.01569825 = product of:
0.039245624 = sum of:
0.02620616 = weight(_text_:den in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02620616 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10344325 = queryWeight, product of:
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.25333852 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.013039465 = product of:
0.039118394 = sum of:
0.039118394 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039118394 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In der Session "Knowledge Representation" auf der ISI 2021 wurden unter der Moderation von Jürgen Reischer (Uni Regensburg) drei Projekte vorgestellt, in denen Knowledge Representation mit RDF umgesetzt wird. Die Domänen sind erfreulich unterschiedlich, die gemeinsame Klammer indes ist die Absicht, den Zugang zu Forschungsdaten zu verbessern: - Japanese Visual Media Graph - Taxonomy of Digital Research Activities in the Humanities - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Frey, J.; Streitmatter, D.; Götz, F.; Hellmann, S.; Arndt, N.: DBpedia Archivo : a Web-Scale interface for ontology archiving under consumer-oriented aspects (2020)
0.00
0.002956213 = product of:
0.014781064 = sum of:
0.014781064 = product of:
0.044343192 = sum of:
0.044343192 = weight(_text_:f in 52) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044343192 = score(doc=52,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 52, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=52)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Baroncini, S.; Sartini, B.; Erp, M. Van; Tomasi, F.; Gangemi, A.: Is dc:subject enough? : A landscape on iconography and iconology statements of knowledge graphs in the semantic web (2023)
0.00
0.0016892646 = product of:
0.008446323 = sum of:
0.008446323 = product of:
0.025338966 = sum of:
0.025338966 = weight(_text_:f in 1030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025338966 = score(doc=1030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 1030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1030)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Pepper, S.; Arnaud, P.J.L.: Absolutely PHAB : toward a general model of associative relations (2020)
0.00
0.0016447286 = product of:
0.008223643 = sum of:
0.008223643 = product of:
0.024670927 = sum of:
0.024670927 = weight(_text_:29 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024670927 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- There have been many attempts at classifying the semantic modification relations (R) of N + N compounds but this work has not led to the acceptance of a definitive scheme, so that devising a reusable classification is a worthwhile aim. The scope of this undertaking is extended to other binominal lexemes, i.e. units that contain two thing-morphemes without explicitly stating R, like prepositional units, N + relational adjective units, etc. The 25-relation taxonomy of Bourque (2014) was tested against over 15,000 binominal lexemes from 106 languages and extended to a 29-relation scheme ("Bourque2") through the introduction of two new reversible relations. Bourque2 is then mapped onto Hatcher's (1960) four-relation scheme (extended by the addition of a fifth relation, similarity , as "Hatcher2"). This results in a two-tier system usable at different degrees of granularities. On account of its semantic proximity to compounding, metonymy is then taken into account, following Janda's (2011) suggestion that it plays a role in word formation; Peirsman and Geeraerts' (2006) inventory of 23 metonymic patterns is mapped onto Bourque2, confirming the identity of metonymic and binominal modification relations. Finally, Blank's (2003) and Koch's (2001) work on lexical semantics justifies the addition to the scheme of a third, superordinate level which comprises the three Aristotelean principles of similarity, contiguity and contrast.
-
Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021)
0.00
0.0016299331 = product of:
0.008149666 = sum of:
0.008149666 = product of:
0.024448996 = sum of:
0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024448996 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2021 14:24:32
-
Frey, J.; Streitmatter, D.; Götz, F.; Hellmann, S.; Arndt, N.: DBpedia Archivo (2020)
0.00
0.0014781065 = product of:
0.007390532 = sum of:
0.007390532 = product of:
0.022171596 = sum of:
0.022171596 = weight(_text_:f in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022171596 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.15412995 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020)
0.00
0.0013039465 = product of:
0.0065197325 = sum of:
0.0065197325 = product of:
0.019559197 = sum of:
0.019559197 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019559197 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036090754 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
