Search (10808 results, page 541 of 541)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Shah, T.A.; Gul, S.; Gaur, R.C.: Authors self-citation behaviour in the field of Library and Information Science (2015) 0.00 
    0.0011409532 = product of:
  0.0057047657 = sum of:
    0.0057047657 = product of:
      0.017114297 = sum of:
        0.017114297 = weight(_text_:22 in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017114297 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  2. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.00 
    9.868371E-4 = product of:
  0.004934185 = sum of:
    0.004934185 = product of:
      0.014802556 = sum of:
        0.014802556 = weight(_text_:29 in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014802556 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
  3. Lavoie, B.; Connaway, L.S.; Dempsey, L.: Anatomy of aggregate collections : the example of Google print for libraries (2005) 0.00 
    9.779598E-4 = product of:
  0.0048897993 = sum of:
    0.0048897993 = product of:
      0.014669397 = sum of:
        0.014669397 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014669397 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:08:22
  4. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00 
    9.779598E-4 = product of:
  0.0048897993 = sum of:
    0.0048897993 = product of:
      0.014669397 = sum of:
        0.014669397 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014669397 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
  5. Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015) 0.00 
    9.779598E-4 = product of:
  0.0048897993 = sum of:
    0.0048897993 = product of:
      0.014669397 = sum of:
        0.014669397 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014669397 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Smiraglia, R.P.: On sameness and difference : an editorial (2008) 0.00 
    8.1496657E-4 = product of:
  0.004074833 = sum of:
    0.004074833 = product of:
      0.012224498 = sum of:
        0.012224498 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012224498 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    12. 6.2008 20:18:22
  7. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00 
    8.1496657E-4 = product of:
  0.004074833 = sum of:
    0.004074833 = product of:
      0.012224498 = sum of:
        0.012224498 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012224498 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27
  8. Metoyer, C.A.; Doyle, A.M.: Introduction to a speicial issue on "Indigenous Knowledge Organization" (2015) 0.00 
    8.1496657E-4 = product of:
  0.004074833 = sum of:
    0.004074833 = product of:
      0.012224498 = sum of:
        0.012224498 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012224498 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26. 8.2015 19:22:31

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • el 428
  • b 38
  • p 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications