Search (900 results, page 45 of 45)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Si, L.E.; O'Brien, A.; Probets, S.: Integration of distributed terminology resources to facilitate subject cross-browsing for library portal systems (2009) 0.00 
    0.0016299331 = product of:
  0.008149666 = sum of:
    0.008149666 = product of:
      0.024448996 = sum of:
        0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024448996 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    This paper is a pre-print version presented at the ISKO UK 2009 conference, 22-23 June, prior to peer review and editing. For published proceedings see special issue of Aslib Proceedings journal.
  2. Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005) 0.00 
    0.0016299331 = product of:
  0.008149666 = sum of:
    0.008149666 = product of:
      0.024448996 = sum of:
        0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024448996 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  3. Baeza-Yates, R.; Boldi, P.; Castillo, C.: Generalizing PageRank : damping functions for linkbased ranking algorithms (2006) 0.00 
    0.0016299331 = product of:
  0.008149666 = sum of:
    0.008149666 = product of:
      0.024448996 = sum of:
        0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024448996 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  4. Dowding, H.; Gengenbach, M.; Graham, B.; Meister, S.; Moran, J.; Peltzman, S.; Seifert, J.; Waugh, D.: OSS4EVA: using open-source tools to fulfill digital preservation requirements (2016) 0.00 
    0.0016299331 = product of:
  0.008149666 = sum of:
    0.008149666 = product of:
      0.024448996 = sum of:
        0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024448996 = score(doc=3200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28.10.2016 18:22:33
  5. Bünte, O.: Bundesdatenschutzbeauftragte bezweifelt Facebooks Datenschutzversprechen (2018) 0.00 
    0.0016299331 = product of:
  0.008149666 = sum of:
    0.008149666 = product of:
      0.024448996 = sum of:
        0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024448996 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    23. 3.2018 13:41:22
  6. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.00 
    0.0016299331 = product of:
  0.008149666 = sum of:
    0.008149666 = product of:
      0.024448996 = sum of:
        0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024448996 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  7. Jörs, B.: ¬Ein kleines Fach zwischen "Daten" und "Wissen" II : Anmerkungen zum (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" (ISI 2021", Regensburg) (2021) 0.00 
    0.0016299331 = product of:
  0.008149666 = sum of:
    0.008149666 = product of:
      0.024448996 = sum of:
        0.024448996 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024448996 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Nur noch Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz und Information Assessment? Doch gerade die Abschottung von anderen Disziplinen verstärkt die Isolation des "kleinen Faches" Informationswissenschaft in der Scientific Community. So bleiben ihr als letzte "eigenständige" Forschungsrandgebiete nur die, die Wolf Rauch als Keynote Speaker bereits in seinem einführenden, historisch-genetischen Vortrag zur Lage der Informationswissenschaft auf der ISI 2021 benannt hat: "Wenn die universitäre Informationswissenschaft (zumindest in Europa) wohl kaum eine Chance hat, im Bereich der Entwicklung von Systemen und Anwendungen wieder an die Spitze der Entwicklung vorzustoßen, bleiben ihr doch Gebiete, in denen ihr Beitrag in der kommenden Entwicklungsphase dringend erforderlich sein wird: Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz, Information Assessment" (Wolf Rauch: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist; in: Thomas Schmidt; Christian Wolff (Eds): Information between Data and Knowledge. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft 74, Regensburg, 2021, Seiten 20-22 - siehe auch die Rezeption des Beitrages von Rauch durch Johannes Elia Panskus, Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist. Sie ist in der Realität angekommen, in: Open Password, 17. März 2021). Das ist alles? Ernüchternd.
  8. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.00 
    0.0014781065 = product of:
  0.007390532 = sum of:
    0.007390532 = product of:
      0.022171596 = sum of:
        0.022171596 = weight(_text_:f in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022171596 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15412995 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
  9. Frey, J.; Streitmatter, D.; Götz, F.; Hellmann, S.; Arndt, N.: DBpedia Archivo (2020) 0.00 
    0.0014781065 = product of:
  0.007390532 = sum of:
    0.007390532 = product of:
      0.022171596 = sum of:
        0.022171596 = weight(_text_:f in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022171596 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15412995 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  10. Hayman, S.; Lothian, N.: Taxonomy directed folksonomies : integrating user tagging and controlled vocabularies for Australian education networks (2007) 0.00 
    0.0013157828 = product of:
  0.006578914 = sum of:
    0.006578914 = product of:
      0.01973674 = sum of:
        0.01973674 = weight(_text_:29 in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973674 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:29:46
  11. Mimno, D.; Crane, G.; Jones, A.: Hierarchical catalog records : implementing a FRBR catalog (2005) 0.00 
    0.0013157828 = product of:
  0.006578914 = sum of:
    0.006578914 = product of:
      0.01973674 = sum of:
        0.01973674 = weight(_text_:29 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973674 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:08:29
  12. Assem, M. van: Converting and integrating vocabularies for the Semantic Web (2010) 0.00 
    0.0013157828 = product of:
  0.006578914 = sum of:
    0.006578914 = product of:
      0.01973674 = sum of:
        0.01973674 = weight(_text_:29 in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973674 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
  13. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.00 
    0.0013039465 = product of:
  0.0065197325 = sum of:
    0.0065197325 = product of:
      0.019559197 = sum of:
        0.019559197 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019559197 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  14. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.00 
    0.0013039465 = product of:
  0.0065197325 = sum of:
    0.0065197325 = product of:
      0.019559197 = sum of:
        0.019559197 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019559197 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
  15. Bradford, R.B.: Relationship discovery in large text collections using Latent Semantic Indexing (2006) 0.00 
    0.0013039465 = product of:
  0.0065197325 = sum of:
    0.0065197325 = product of:
      0.019559197 = sum of:
        0.019559197 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019559197 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]
  16. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.00 
    0.0013039465 = product of:
  0.0065197325 = sum of:
    0.0065197325 = product of:
      0.019559197 = sum of:
        0.019559197 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019559197 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  17. Maurer, H.; Balke, T.; Kappe,, F.; Kulathuramaiyer, N.; Weber, S.; Zaka, B.: Report on dangers and opportunities posed by large search engines, particularly Google (2007) 0.00 
    0.0012669483 = product of:
  0.0063347416 = sum of:
    0.0063347416 = product of:
      0.019004224 = sum of:
        0.019004224 = weight(_text_:f in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019004224 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14385001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.13211139 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.00 
    9.868371E-4 = product of:
  0.004934185 = sum of:
    0.004934185 = product of:
      0.014802556 = sum of:
        0.014802556 = weight(_text_:29 in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014802556 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
  19. Lavoie, B.; Connaway, L.S.; Dempsey, L.: Anatomy of aggregate collections : the example of Google print for libraries (2005) 0.00 
    9.779598E-4 = product of:
  0.0048897993 = sum of:
    0.0048897993 = product of:
      0.014669397 = sum of:
        0.014669397 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014669397 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:08:22
  20. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00 
    9.779598E-4 = product of:
  0.0048897993 = sum of:
    0.0048897993 = product of:
      0.014669397 = sum of:
        0.014669397 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014669397 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12638368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036090754 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 634
  • e 247
  • f 3
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • i 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 428
  • i 45
  • m 20
  • r 17
  • x 16
  • p 13
  • n 12
  • s 9
  • b 8
  • l 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications