Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bainbridge, D."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Witten, I.H.; Bainbridge, D.; Boddie, S.J.: Greenstone : open-source digital library software (2001) 0.01
    0.013004904 = product of:
      0.026009807 = sum of:
        0.026009807 = product of:
          0.052019615 = sum of:
            0.052019615 = weight(_text_:web in 1225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052019615 = score(doc=1225,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1225, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Greenstone digital library software is an open-source system for the construction and presentation of information collections. It builds collections with effective full-text searching and metadata-based browsing facilities that are attractive and easy to use. Moreover, they are easily maintained and can be augmented and rebuilt entirely automatically. The system is extensible: software "plugins" accommodate different document and metadata types. Greenstone incorporates an interface that makes it easy for people to create their own library collections. Collections may be built and served locally from the user's own web server, or (given appropriate permissions) remotely on a shared digital library host. End users can easily build new collections styled after existing ones from material on the Web or from their local files (or both), and collections can be updated and new ones brought on-line at any time.
  2. Nichols, D.M.; Paynter, G.W.; Chan, C.-H.; Bainbridge, D.; McKay, D.; Twidale, M.B.; Blandford, A.: Experiences in deploying metadata analysis tools for institutional repositories (2009) 0.01
    0.01083742 = product of:
      0.02167484 = sum of:
        0.02167484 = product of:
          0.04334968 = sum of:
            0.04334968 = weight(_text_:web in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04334968 = score(doc=2986,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Current institutional repository software provides few tools to help metadata librarians understand and analyse their collections. In this paper, we compare and contrast metadata analysis tools that were developed simultaneously, but independently, at two New Zealand institutions during a period of national investment in research repositories: the Metadata Analysis Tool (MAT) at The University of Waikato, and the Kiwi Research Information Service (KRIS) at the National Library of New Zealand. The tools have many similarities: they are convenient, online, on-demand services that harvest metadata using OAI-PMH, they were developed in response to feedback from repository administrators, and they both help pinpoint specific metadata errors as well as generating summary statistics. They also have significant differences: one is a dedicated tool while the other is part of a wider access tool; one gives a holistic view of the metadata while the other looks for specific problems; one seeks patterns in the data values while the other checks that those values conform to metadata standards. Both tools work in a complementary manner to existing web-based administration tools. We have observed that discovery and correction of metadata errors can be quickly achieved by switching web browser views from the analysis tool to the repository interface, and back. We summarise the findings from both tools' deployment into a checklist of requirements for metadata analysis tools.
  3. Bainbridge, D.: Music information retrieval research and its context at the University of Waikato (2004) 0.01
    0.010728499 = product of:
      0.021456998 = sum of:
        0.021456998 = product of:
          0.042913996 = sum of:
            0.042913996 = weight(_text_:web in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042913996 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the digital music library work at the University of Waikato, New Zealand. At the heart of the project is a music information retrieval workbench for evaluating algorithms and performing experiments used in conjunction with four datasets of symbolic notation ranging from contemporary to classical pieces. The outcome of this experimentation is woven together with strands from our larger digital library project to form the Web-based music digital library MELDEX (short for melody index). An overview of the workbench software architecture is given along with a description of how this fits the larger digital library design, followed by several examples of MELDEX in use.
  4. Nichols, D.M.; Witten, I.H.; Keegan, T.T.; Bainbridge, D.; Dewsnip, M.: Digital libraries and minority languages (2005) 0.01
    0.010728499 = product of:
      0.021456998 = sum of:
        0.021456998 = product of:
          0.042913996 = sum of:
            0.042913996 = weight(_text_:web in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042913996 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Minority languages, multimedia and the Web"