-
Ingwersen, P.: ¬The calculation of Web impact factors (1998)
0.03
0.032185495 = product of:
0.06437099 = sum of:
0.06437099 = product of:
0.12874198 = sum of:
0.12874198 = weight(_text_:web in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12874198 = score(doc=1071,freq=18.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.75719774 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports investigations into the feasibility and reliability of calculating impact factors for web sites, called Web Impact Factors (Web-IF). analyzes a selection of 7 small and medium scale national and 4 large web domains as well as 6 institutional web sites over a series of snapshots taken of the web during a month. Describes the data isolation and calculation methods and discusses the tests. The results thus far demonstrate that Web-IFs are calculable with high confidence for national and sector domains whilst institutional Web-IFs should be approached with caution
-
Jepsen, E.T.; Seiden, P.; Ingwersen, P.; Björneborn, L.; Borlund, P.: Characteristics of scientific Web publications : preliminary data gathering and analysis (2004)
0.02
0.02167484 = product of:
0.04334968 = sum of:
0.04334968 = product of:
0.08669936 = sum of:
0.08669936 = weight(_text_:web in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08669936 = score(doc=3091,freq=16.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Because of the increasing presence of scientific publications an the Web, combined with the existing difficulties in easily verifying and retrieving these publications, research an techniques and methods for retrieval of scientific Web publications is called for. In this article, we report an the initial steps taken toward the construction of a test collection of scientific Web publications within the subject domain of plant biology. The steps reported are those of data gathering and data analysis aiming at identifying characteristics of scientific Web publications. The data used in this article were generated based an specifically selected domain topics that are searched for in three publicly accessible search engines (Google, AlITheWeb, and AItaVista). A sample of the retrieved hits was analyzed with regard to how various publication attributes correlated with the scientific quality of the content and whether this information could be employed to harvest, filter, and rank Web publications. The attributes analyzed were inlinks, outlinks, bibliographic references, file format, language, search engine overlap, structural position (according to site structure), and the occurrence of various types of metadata. As could be expected, the ranked output differs between the three search engines. Apparently, this is caused by differences in ranking algorithms rather than the databases themselves. In fact, because scientific Web content in this subject domain receives few inlinks, both AItaVista and AlITheWeb retrieved a higher degree of accessible scientific content than Google. Because of the search engine cutoffs of accessible URLs, the feasibility of using search engine output for Web content analysis is also discussed.
-
Björneborn, L.; Ingwersen, P.: Toward a basic framework for Webometrics (2004)
0.02
0.015172388 = product of:
0.030344777 = sum of:
0.030344777 = product of:
0.060689554 = sum of:
0.060689554 = weight(_text_:web in 3088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060689554 = score(doc=3088,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 3088, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, we define webometrics within the framework of informetric studies and bibliometrics, as belonging to library and information science, and as associated with cybermetrics as a generic subfield. We develop a consistent and detailed link typology and terminology and make explicit the distinction among different Web node levels when using the proposed conceptual framework. As a consequence, we propose a novel diagram notation to fully appreciate and investigate link structures between Web nodes in webometric analyses. We warn against taking the analogy between citation analyses and link analyses too far.
-
Almind, T.C.; Ingwersen, P.: Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web : methodological approaches to 'Webometrics' (1997)
0.01
0.010728499 = product of:
0.021456998 = sum of:
0.021456998 = product of:
0.042913996 = sum of:
0.042913996 = weight(_text_:web in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042913996 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
