Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × author_ss:"Zhang, Y."
  1. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.05
    0.04718572 = product of:
      0.09437144 = sum of:
        0.09437144 = sum of:
          0.052019615 = weight(_text_:web in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052019615 = score(doc=2742,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042351827 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this research, we aim to identify factors that significantly affect the clickthrough of Web searchers. Our underlying goal is determine more efficient methods to optimize the clickthrough rate. We devise a clickthrough metric for measuring customer satisfaction of search engine results using the number of links visited, number of queries a user submits, and rank of clicked links. We use a neural network to detect the significant influence of searching characteristics on future user clickthrough. Our results show that high occurrences of query reformulation, lengthy searching duration, longer query length, and the higher ranking of prior clicked links correlate positively with future clickthrough. We provide recommendations for leveraging these findings for improving the performance of search engine retrieval and result ranking, along with implications for search engine marketing.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  2. Zhang, Y.: ¬The effect of open access on citation impact : a comparison study based on Web citation analysis (2006) 0.02
    0.024233207 = product of:
      0.048466414 = sum of:
        0.048466414 = product of:
          0.09693283 = sum of:
            0.09693283 = weight(_text_:web in 5071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09693283 = score(doc=5071,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 5071, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The academic impact advantage of Open Access (OA) is a prominent topic of debate in the library and publishing communities. Web citations have been proposed as comparable to, even replacements for, bibliographic citations in assessing the academic impact of journals. In our study, we compare Web citations to articles in an OA journal, the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC), and a traditional access journal, New Media & Society (NMS), in the communication discipline. Web citation counts for JCMC are significantly higher than those for NMS. Furthermore, JCMC receives significantly higher Web citations from the formal scholarly publications posted on the Web than NMS does. The types of Web citations for journal articles were also examined. In the Web context, the impact of a journal can be assessed using more than one type of source: citations from scholarly articles, teaching materials and non-authoritative documents. The OA journal has higher percentages of citations from the third type, which suggests that, in addition to the research community, the impact advantage of open access is also detectable among ordinary users participating in Web-based academic communication. Moreover, our study also proves that the OA journal has impact advantage in developing countries. Compared with NMS, JCMC has more Web citations from developing countries.
  3. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.012478027 = product of:
      0.024956053 = sum of:
        0.024956053 = product of:
          0.049912106 = sum of:
            0.049912106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049912106 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  4. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023) 0.01
    0.008823298 = product of:
      0.017646596 = sum of:
        0.017646596 = product of:
          0.03529319 = sum of:
            0.03529319 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03529319 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:07:12