Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.04
    0.039567623 = product of:
      0.07913525 = sum of:
        0.07913525 = sum of:
          0.03678342 = weight(_text_:web in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03678342 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042351827 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  2. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02
    0.021175914 = product of:
      0.042351827 = sum of:
        0.042351827 = product of:
          0.084703654 = sum of:
            0.084703654 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084703654 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  3. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02
    0.021175914 = product of:
      0.042351827 = sum of:
        0.042351827 = product of:
          0.084703654 = sum of:
            0.084703654 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084703654 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  4. Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999) 0.02
    0.015927691 = product of:
      0.031855382 = sum of:
        0.031855382 = product of:
          0.063710764 = sum of:
            0.063710764 = weight(_text_:web in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063710764 = score(doc=726,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.
  5. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.014117276 = product of:
      0.028234553 = sum of:
        0.028234553 = product of:
          0.056469105 = sum of:
            0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056469105 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  6. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.014117276 = product of:
      0.028234553 = sum of:
        0.028234553 = product of:
          0.056469105 = sum of:
            0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056469105 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  7. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.0123526165 = product of:
      0.024705233 = sum of:
        0.024705233 = product of:
          0.049410466 = sum of:
            0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049410466 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  8. Beghtol, C.: General classification systems : structural principles for multidisciplinary specification (1998) 0.01
    0.009195855 = product of:
      0.01839171 = sum of:
        0.01839171 = product of:
          0.03678342 = sum of:
            0.03678342 = weight(_text_:web in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03678342 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this century, knowledge creation, production, dissemination and use have changed profoundly. Intellectual and physical barriers have been substantially reduced by the rise of multidisciplinarity and by the influence of computerization, particularly by the spread of the World Wide Web (WWW). Bibliographic classification systems need to respond to this situation. Three possible strategic responses are described: 1) adopting an existing system; 2) adapting an existing system; and 3) finding new structural principles for classification systems. Examples of these three responses are given. An extended example of the third option uses the knowledge outline in the Spectrum of Britannica Online to suggest a theory of "viewpoint warrant" that could be used to incorporate differing perspectives into general classification systems
  9. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01
    0.008823298 = product of:
      0.017646596 = sum of:
        0.017646596 = product of:
          0.03529319 = sum of:
            0.03529319 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03529319 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22