-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.06
0.06445197 = product of:
0.12890394 = sum of:
0.12890394 = sum of:
0.049044564 = weight(_text_:web in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049044564 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.079859376 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079859376 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.05
0.046162233 = product of:
0.092324466 = sum of:
0.092324466 = sum of:
0.042913996 = weight(_text_:web in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042913996 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049410466 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.03
0.029947266 = product of:
0.059894532 = sum of:
0.059894532 = product of:
0.119789064 = sum of:
0.119789064 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.119789064 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = product of:
0.11293821 = sum of:
0.11293821 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11293821 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.024705233 = product of:
0.049410466 = sum of:
0.049410466 = product of:
0.09882093 = sum of:
0.09882093 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09882093 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.024705233 = product of:
0.049410466 = sum of:
0.049410466 = product of:
0.09882093 = sum of:
0.09882093 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09882093 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.019964844 = product of:
0.039929688 = sum of:
0.039929688 = product of:
0.079859376 = sum of:
0.079859376 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079859376 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Cranefield, S.: Networked knowledge representation and exchange using UML and RDF (2001)
0.02
0.015172388 = product of:
0.030344777 = sum of:
0.030344777 = product of:
0.060689554 = sum of:
0.060689554 = weight(_text_:web in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060689554 = score(doc=5896,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.014117276 = product of:
0.028234553 = sum of:
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056469105 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.01
0.014117276 = product of:
0.028234553 = sum of:
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056469105 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.01
0.014117276 = product of:
0.028234553 = sum of:
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056469105 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.014117276 = product of:
0.028234553 = sum of:
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056469105 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.01
0.0123526165 = product of:
0.024705233 = sum of:
0.024705233 = product of:
0.049410466 = sum of:
0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049410466 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004)
0.01
0.0123526165 = product of:
0.024705233 = sum of:
0.024705233 = product of:
0.049410466 = sum of:
0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049410466 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
-
Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997)
0.01
0.010728499 = product of:
0.021456998 = sum of:
0.021456998 = product of:
0.042913996 = sum of:
0.042913996 = weight(_text_:web in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042913996 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Secondary information, e.g. MARC based bibliographic records, comprises structured data for identifying, tagging, retrieving and management of primary documents. SGML, the standard format for coding content and structure of primary documents, was introduced in 1986 as a publishing tool but is now being applied to bibliographic records. SGML now comprises standard definitions (DTD) for books, serials, articles and mathematical formulae. A simplified version (HTML) is used for Web pages. Pilot projects to develop SGML as a standard for bibliographic exchange include the Dublin Core, listing 13 descriptive elements for Internet documents; the French GRISELI programme using SGML for exchanging grey literature and US experiments on reformatting USMARC for use with SGML-based records
-
Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004)
0.01
0.010587957 = product of:
0.021175914 = sum of:
0.021175914 = product of:
0.042351827 = sum of:
0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042351827 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.01
0.010587957 = product of:
0.021175914 = sum of:
0.021175914 = product of:
0.042351827 = sum of:
0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042351827 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.01
0.010587957 = product of:
0.021175914 = sum of:
0.021175914 = product of:
0.042351827 = sum of:
0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042351827 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Martin, P.: Conventions and notations for knowledge representation and retrieval (2000)
0.01
0.009195855 = product of:
0.01839171 = sum of:
0.01839171 = product of:
0.03678342 = sum of:
0.03678342 = weight(_text_:web in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03678342 = score(doc=5070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Much research has focused on the problem of knowledge accessibility, sharing and reuse. Specific languages (e.g. KIF, CG, RDF) and ontologies have been proposed. Common characteristics, conventions or ontological distinctions are beginning to emerge. Since knowledge providers (humans and software agents) must follow common conventions for the knowledge to be widely accessed and re-used, we propose lexical, structural, semantic and ontological conventions based on various knowledge representation projects and our own research. These are minimal conventions that can be followed by most and cover the most common knowledge representation cases. However, agreement and refinements are still required. We also show that a notation can be both readable and expressive by quickly presenting two new notations -- Formalized English (FE) and Frame-CG (FCG) - derived from the CG linear form [9] and Frame-Logics [4]. These notations support the above conventions, and are implemented in our Web-based knowledge representation and document indexation tool, WebKB¹ [7]
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.01
0.008823298 = product of:
0.017646596 = sum of:
0.017646596 = product of:
0.03529319 = sum of:
0.03529319 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03529319 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
